| NAZI EU |
This released by The Magna Carta Society.
--- see below…..
Could the British people, with their strikingly different way of doing things, ever be successfully governed by such a domineering European autocracy, with which it has traditionally been prepared to go to war and spill its own blood to defeat?
Time, and the reaction of the British people to what is happening to them, will tell.
The German European Economic Community ?
Following Phillip Day's previous EClub article on the EU's new Food Supplements Directive, comes this shocking passage from his forthcoming book, which cites documentation that should be of concern to all Britons and their Commonwealth cousins. Is the answer simply to combat the new directive, or is the EU itself not the correct target on which we should be focussing?
Adolf Hitler's policy of 'divide and rule' is still the definitive template for overcoming a conquered nation's sovereignty and setting up a federalised system of government. Federalisation itself is not inherently evil or wrong. It has worked successfully for America, Canada and Australia, where individual states have ordered their states with regional governments, over which presides a central, or federal government adjudicating the whole.
However some basic conditions need to exist for this form of government to work. The United States of America, perhaps the most successful example of the federal model, was brought together through the common bonds of culture, language, religion, currency and heritage. More importantly, the formation of the US came about through its people's desire to order their affairs in this manner. In other words, the federalisation of the USA, Canada and Australia was citizen-driven.
Roman citizenship, even to the conquered, meant prosperity, food and, to a lesser extent, a continuation and survival of their indigenous culture and protection from their enemies, as we saw with Greece and Gaul (France). It is this plan that Hitler attempted to implement. Sometimes referred to as the Hegelian Dialectic, this method uses a three-step process to lead and 'educate' populations into accepting measures, a loss of sovereignty and emergency procedures they normally would not tolerate.
This is the classic battle-plan of socialism, whether it is used militarily, economically or politically by the Big Government of the 'fascist right', or by the Big Government of the 'Communist left'. Either way, it's Big Government controlling all aspects of the citizen's life, with all the power and the money under control of a governing 'élite'.
Today, the EU strategy for integration is constantly pursued, not militarily at the moment, but by stealth and coercion. It's still divide and rule. The same strategy, drawing heavily from the Nazi model which inspired it, has been planned for Britain, which is to be broken up into 12 regions, all to be centrally ruled by a centralised government in Brussels dominated by Germany and France and the countries prepared to vote with them.
Note that the EU solves the historical problems for German and French politicians, who have been traditional enemies:
* The Union secures their borders, puts them in the driving seat of the Union by expanding their influence over the less powerful countries of Europe.
* For France and Germany, the EU keeps each under the other's nose so these traditional enemies can watch each other.
* The EU forms a mighty power block to rival the only remaining superpower, America.
* By bringing Britain into the EU by coercion and deceit, the EU effectively destroys NATO's ability effectively to guard against future military ambitions on the Continent. No doubt, once Britain is safely swallowed up in the new European superstate, America and her UK bases will be told to pack up and go home by the hostile, unelected politicians in Brussels.
* Finally, and perhaps significantly, the EU can deal the ultimate death blow to Britain's traditional political and economic dominance. Britain is unfinished business for Europe, stretching back centuries. Britain must be broken up for all time and her spoils handed to the masters of the EU, dominated by France and Germany.
As we will learn, this was planned decades ago by Nazi ministers and economists, even after they expected to lose the war.
Political researcher Ashley Mote records:
"By 1938, Henri Spaak, one of the founding fathers of the EU, was openly calling himself a 'national socialist' (Nazi). He talked of Hitler's 'magnificent achievements'. He was one of the activists who encouraged Belgian rail workers to strike when Germany invaded in 1940, and he helped ensure that the British and French troops failed to establish a defensive line against the invaders.
On 22nd June 1940, Hermann Goering made the first reference to what he called 'the European Economic Community'. At a conference held in Germany at that time, it was suggested that 'England has to be evicted from the continent once and for all, and the new Europe keep its distance from the United States.'"
That same year, the former Kaiser Wilhelm wrote: "We are becoming a United States of Europe under German leadership, a united Europe."
The Nazis were making a clear distinction between the Anglo-Saxon economies on the one hand, and their own and those of the rest of the world on the other. The United States and the British Empire nations of Britain herself, South Africa, Canada, Australia and New Zealand were depicted as the liberal usurpers and economic bulldozers of the dreams and happiness of the rest of mankind. Nazi Germany had taken it upon herself to redress the balance.
By the end of 1941, Nazi domination of Europe was solidifying, with the glaring exception of Britain. To save on manpower, Hitler allowed the southern area of France to be run by the French Vichy government, which openly collaborated with the Nazis. To this day in France, the collaboration wounds are still deep. That same year, Hitler's minister Joachim von Ribbentrop commented on Germany's plan to dominate Europe economically as well as militarily, confidently proclaiming: "…[European] integration is inevitable… It is impossible to stop the trend." Where have we heard that before?
Heydrich is Hitler's Wunderkind - an operations genius who has just been appointed 'Reich Protector' of Bohemia and Moravia in September 1941. Heydrich's career with the Nazis has been spectacular and meteoric. Having organised the entire Nazi secret police and intelligence services (SS and SD) even before his party gained power, Heydrich is trusted by the Nazis for his incredible capacity for organisation on a large scale. It was Heydrich who had removed Nazi opponents quietly and effectively to the Dachau camp near Munich. It was Heydrich who, by 1934, had all the political police of the Reich under his iron control. It was Heydrich who had organised four special task forces to follow Operation Barbarossa, Hitler's invasion of Russia, liquidating all Communist officials, saboteurs, agitators and Jews as the Nazis advanced. By the time Heydrich convenes his famous meeting of 15 senior Nazi officials at a villa at the beautiful lakeside retreat of Wannsee, ostensibly to examine the options of ridding Europe of 'parasitic Jewry', wholesale murder of the Jews in Russia has become routine. Historian Martin Gilbert tells us:
"From the first days of the German invasion of the Soviet Union, the SS Special Task Forces took Jews out of their homes to the nearest wood or ravine, and shot them down. Tens of thousands of Jews were murdered in the first few weeks; hundreds of thousands in the months ahead; as many as a million by the end of the year. As the executions spread from town to town and village to village, babies and small children were thrown into the deep pits in which their parents had been shot."
In spite of the brutality of his command, there is compelling evidence that Heydrich, born in Prussian Saxony the son of a music director and minor composer, is secretly disgusted with the scale of the worst tasks he is called upon to perform. That Heydrich is not just the simple Nazi monster he is often painted to be is evident when one studies the amazing social reforms the SS-General is able to introduce into Czech society through his own initiatives.
Heydrich understands that the carrot and the stick are both of use in maximising the productivity of conquered European people brought under the heel of the Reich. Heydrich discovers that Czech farmers have been holding out on the true number of cattle they have registered. He orders all surplus animals to be slaughtered and the meat added to the rations of the factory workers. On Labour Day 1942, Heydrich distributes thousands of free cinema, theatre and football tickets to the working population to reward them for their hard endeavours. New national insurance cover, pension rights, new wage levels and holiday entitlements are agreed with the Czech trade unions. Ignoring the safety risks, Heydrich often tours the factories of his protectorate, telling the dumbfounded workers to their faces what an inspiration they all are - even to the Nazis.
Clear is the fact that Hitler himself will issue no such order sanctioning the murder of eleven million Jews, although clearly the mass exterminations which follow can never go ahead without the Führer's approval. Hitler's quandary and subsequent refusal to issue a written order for the exterminations, according to researcher Ernst Klee, appears to be centred on the fact that it is actually still illegal at this time in Nazi Germany to murder people:
"Everyone involved knows that Hitler rejects a legal ruling for political reasons."
Heydrich himself makes this expressly clear at Wannsee when some of the incredulous attendees, after hearing of Heydrich's proposal for the extermination of the Jews, timidly request the whereabouts of an official written order from the Führer. Heydrich once again pointedly reminds his audience of the need to purge Germany of undesirables. He is counting on their unanimous support to overcome the logistic problems of ceasing the propagation of 'inferior stock'.
In his book, The Villa, The Lake, The Meeting: Wannsee and the Final Solution, British scholar Mark Roseman uses the minutes from the infamous meeting to paint an almost unbelievable portrait of cultured men gathering in a stately, picturesque location, eating superb food, smoking cigars and sipping cognac, discussing the fate of such 'mental degenerates' as remain, along with the removal of up to 11 million Jews from European society. The meeting, conducted in cultured tones, begins with the question of deportation of undesirables. References are made to the success of the previous T4 euthanasia program which was used to murder the Reich's mentally ill.
Although the question of sterilisation is openly discussed in connection with the desire to prevent 'inferior races' from propagating, it is quite evident from the minutes that Heydrich is dissatisfied with the costs and manpower associated with extending this kind of operation. At Wannsee, we see the indomitable Heydrich presenting the top brass with a fait accompli with his Endlösung, his Final Solution for the Jews - a package of measures already thoroughly planned, costed down to the last detail, and bearing the Heydrich stamp of approval.
Heydrich also drew up "The Reich Plan for the Domination of Europe". This proposal was published and circulated in 1942 and bears a striking similarity to the 1957 Treaty of Rome, on which the European Union is based today.
Ashley Mote takes up the story:
"Heydrich's plan coincided with a conference organised by the University of Berlin in 1942, entitled "Europaische Wirtshaftgemeinschaft" - the European Economic Community (or EEC). Some of the papers had particularly chilling titles, which still resonate today: "The Economic Face of New Europe", "Development of the EEC", "European Agriculture", "European Transport", "A European Currency", "European Trade and Economic Treaties", "Is Europe a Geographical Concept or a Political Fact?"
The introductory comments to the conference included the observation, "The age-old doctrine of the balance of power has been militarily smashed". There were references to "the political union of Europe."
But one of the first of many blows strikes Hitler on 27th May 1942. As Reinhard Heydrich takes the beautiful drive from his villa at Panenske Brezany to his headquarters in the Czech capital Prague, his Mercedes slows to negotiate a hairpin bend in the city suburbs. Two British-trained Czech agents, Kubis and Gabcik attack Heydrich's vehicle with a Sten gun that jams, and a specially prepared fragmentation grenade that doesn't. Heydrich is mortally wounded, his spleen and diaphragm pierced by shrapnel as well as cloth and leather fragments from the vehicle's upholstery. Nine days later, on 4th June, Heydrich dies in agony from his wounds. Hitler has lost his European architect.
As Heydrich's coffin, draped in the swastika, is drawn by four jet-black horses in procession towards the Veteran's Cemetery, the retaliation hundreds of miles to the south in Czechoslovakia has already begun. The Führer is beside himself with rage. Hundreds of Czechs of doubtful political allegiance are rounded up and shot. The entire village of Lidice, thought to have sheltered Heydrich's assassins at some point during their five-month preparation, has its entire male population machine-gunned and its women and children driven away to concentration camps.
The assassins are eventually tracked down to an Orthodox Church in Ressel Street, Prague. Hundreds of SS surround the building while their officers puzzle out how to finish the stand-off. Finally the pride of Heydrich's officer corps orders the Prague fire department to pump water from the River Vltava into the crypt to drown 'the vermin'. Later the bodies of the priests, assassins and collaborators are recovered. All are found to have died either fighting or having committed suicide with the last of their bullets before the water could reach them.
Nazi economists grimly press on, nonetheless. In March 1943, von Ribbentrop invites 13 countries to join a European federation under German leadership. The nations invited are Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, Italy, France, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Greece, Portugal and Spain. As all are either already under Nazi domination or known sympathisers to the Reich, the 'invitation' seems spurious, but is indeed telling. Here we see proof that efforts are still being made, even at this late hour, to pull together a workable political and economic union under control of the Reich.
By August 1944, the Germans recognise that certain defeat is staring them in the face. Another conference is convened, this time with the theme: "How will Germany Dominate the Peace When it Loses the War"?
A secret conference took place between the heads of the German Nazi government and top German industrialist at the Hotel Rotes Haus in Strasbourg. They laid plans to salt away finance to continue the fight for control of Europe by stealth. It was a plan on a grand scale, set in the context of decades. It was a plan to be implemented so slowly that no-one would realise what was happening….
The agenda included the exporting of large sums of capital, and the establishment of German industrial concerns in countries that were not overly antagonistic to the Nazi aims. Massive funds left Germany shortly afterwards, much of them via Madrid.
This was a careful attempt to hide and put on ice the Nazis' dreams of world domination, perhaps for generations. The price demanded was that these industrialists would then support the Nazi Party when it came out of hiding, which it was estimated would be at least 40 years after the eventual defeat of the Third Reich. Elan Steinberg, of the World Jewish Congress, has recently asked: "The central question is whether it has been carried out."
"The European parliament and the commission are allies against the member states. Together we have to prevent the member states from taking back power." President of the European parliament, speaking on Radio 4, July 1999
"When we build the house of Europe, the future will belong to Germany." Helmut Kohl, speaking in Germany, unaware that reporters were present
"Germany, as the biggest and most powerful economic member state will be the leader [of Europe] whether you like it or not." Theo Waigel, former German finance minister, 1997
"The top priority is to turn the EU into a single political state." Joshka Fischer, German foreign minister, quoted in The Times, November 1998
"Never again must there be a destabilising vacuum of power in central Europe. If European integration were not to progress, Germany might be called upon, or tempted by its own security constraints, to try to effect the stabilisation on its own and in the traditional way." German CDU parliamentary committee on European affairs, September 1994
"Why does Europe need fifteen foreign ministers when one is enough? Why do member states still need national armies? One European army is enough." Hans Eichel, German finance minister, November 1999
The ultimate issue Britons must face, when contemplating joining or rejecting the EU's governance over their country, boils down, in the final analysis, to the worth of the fundamental freedoms traditionally enjoyed by the British individual. We must ask ourselves, does any government actually have the right to legislate into every corner of our lives, citing as the reason for its blizzard of directives, 'One Death (caused by oak trees, conkers, vitamins, donkeys on Bogner Beach, etc.) is One Death too Many' ?
The EU sees the vitamin issue as just another area where a loophole needs closing. When one truly understands the core nature of how the EU operates, can one any longer be certain that if, for instance, measures such as metrication, a common currency or the Food Supplements Directive could be defeated by an outraged British populace, this will, in any realistic way, GUARANTEE that no future efforts will be made to reintroduce these laws over and over again until they are passed?
Of course, those working with the best of intentions within the European Union are themselves not evil or wicked. They honestly believe they are legislating for the common good in the way the powers of Europe have always done. Yet this way is atavistically alien to the way the British have gone about the business of governing themselves and others, which ultimately begs the REAL question: Could the British people, with their strikingly different way of doing things, ever be successfully governed by such a domineering European autocracy, with which it has traditionally been prepared to go to war and spill its own blood to defeat?
Time, and the reaction of the British people to what is happening to them, will tell.
Next EClub: The True and Shocking Face of the European Union
Posts
