Saturday, October 23, 2010
Chavez Following Iran, N. Korean Nuke Model
Obama Counting on Iran's Cooperation for 2012
Countdown to catastrophe.
Sunday, 24 October 2010
For his reelection bid, America's appeaser-in-chief appears to be counting on Iran's maniac-in-chief. More specifically, U.S. President Barack Obama is hoping that Iran, which is closer than ever to developing nuclear weapons, will neither declare itself a nuclear weapons state nor detonate an atomic device prior to November 2012.
Obama, who has built an utterly failed foreign policy around idiotic Iran engagement (Obama code for appeasement of and attempts to actually align with the monstrous mullahocracy) and "Muslim world" outreach, knows that he will surely be blamed if his adversary formally crosses the nuclear line the way its Stalinist/Kimist partner in nuclear and missile crimes, North Korea, did after the international community failed to stop its atomic advance. But Obama believes that Iran, which brazenly proclaims that it intends to overthrow the world order, will tacitly support his administration in order to prevent a Republican from coming to power.
Obama could effectively also be counting on Al Qaeda's cooperation for 2012. A significant terrorist attack on the U.S. homeland would instantly ruin Obama's chances for a second term; and while the Islamist terror group is expected to strike Europe--specifically, France, Germany, and the UK--any day now, Bin Laden and Co., like Ahmadinejad and his mad mullahs and atomic ayataollah, may elect to keep Al Qaeda's powder dry with respect to the "Great Satan" in order to facilitate a further U.S. downgrading of the War on Terror.
True, Obama's relentless drone attacks have hurt AQ and the Taliban in Pakistan. But the enemy, taking the long view, probably prefers to keep America's party of appeasement in power. Moreover, in addition to giving Obama a respite (Democrats will argue that appeasement preserves the peace in American cities) temporarily confining Islamist swarming assaults and suicide and vehicular bombings to Europe will provide Al Qaeda and associated groups with useful experience and knowledge ahead of launching a U.S. terror offensive.
On the other hand, the leaders of Al Qaeda (unlike Obama's adoring, American media flunkies) understand that they are in a kind of competition with the Muslim-born President--whom millions of Muslims regard as one of their own in spite of his Christian identification--for leadership of the so-called Muslim world. So the terrorists may seek to step up efforts to slaughter innocent Americans in the name of Islam with the aim of triggering a huge anti-Muslim backlash. Historically speaking, radicals typically try to make matters worse for their own people in order to radicalize them.
Will the terrorists give Obama a break? Nobody knows the answer to that question, except, perhaps, the terrorist chiefs. I say perhaps because it is quite possible, if not highly probable, that radical Islam's mass murdering masterminds are themselves still debating strategy and tactics regarding the U.S.
This much is certain: as shown by 9/11, those who plot and plan America's doom must be stopped--meaning, hunted down and killed--before they can execute their evil plans.
The world is a safer place when it is the terrorists--and their state sponsors--instead of their intended victims, who live in constant fear of being obliterated.
Posts
