Saturday, October 23, 2010
WAS NON-MUSLIM WOMAN TARGET OF CHEMICAL BOMB SET OFF BY MUSLIM TEEN OUTSIDE MOSQUE?
Back on September 23, I reported on a Muslim teen who set off a chemical bomb outside a Maine mosque. All of the islamic supremacist groups were ready to pounce on this "hate crime" until it was discovered, yet again, that it was a Muslim (most of these "attacks" on or near mosques are committed by Muslims). Then the story disappeared.
Had it been a non-Muslim playing with acid bombs outside a mosque, the American people would have been herded into Muslim Brotherhood CAIR camps. But because it was a Muslim boy, no harm, no foul.
Not so fast. Bombs, Muslims = jihad.
Creeping has this creepy update on police and FBI indifference or incompetence. Or is it submission? Via Taqiyya, She Wrote (hat tip Armaros)
Debbie’s story is rather interesting, since she was not only there when the bomb went off, but was possibly targeted.
Debbie is an employee at the Back Bay Grill. Debbie’s explanation is rather different from the news accounts and the D.A. to say the least,
“At about 7:45 I decided to go get my phone charger from my car. The Mosque (The Islamic Society of Portland) back door and parking lot is directly behind the Back Bay grill and it was filled with people and cars.”
“As I walked I saw a van loading up with women and children. The Kids ran in front of me in an obvious scurry and closed the vehicle door.”
Building on left-Islamic society of Portland, building on right-Back Bay Grill
Then she explains about the blast,
“I took several more steps and then the chemical bottle bomb exploded directly in front of me. It stopped me in my tracks. It was exceedingly loud. A child that sounded like it came from the van full of children shouted, in a proud- sort of accomplished way, “He did it! He did it!”
Debbie’s first reaction was to yell,
“Who did this, who did this?”
Then the Taqiyya began. Debbie heard the woman in the van respond,
“Not MY Children”.
As Debbie explains further, the Taqiyya continues,
“I then turned to my left and behind me and there was a Muslim man standing there, and I said, ‘Who did this? Who did this?’ And he said to me ‘Did what?’ I said, “Set off that explosion?” He said in complete denial “What explosion?”
Parking lot behind Islamic Society and Back Bay Grill
The Back Bay Grill Manager came out and she told him what happened. The manager went over and picked up what was left of the plastic bottle and looked it over.
The manager, who would later suffer from a burn on his face from the chemicals on his hands, told Debbie that while he was speaking with the men, they took the exploded bottle inside the mosque.
Debbie returned to the restaurant to calm down. She was, “scared, upset and angry.” When the manager returned he phoned the police at Debbie’s suggestion.
The manager then waited outside for the police to arrive.
The 9-11 operator was told that there was just an explosion outside the mosque. One would think that the police, fire department and ambulances would be there in a matter of minutes, right?
I have to enlighten everyone that this is not the safest part of town. It has its share of homeless people sleeping on the street, prostitutes and other characters. The main Portland Post Office is located only half a block away.
According to people I have spoken with, across the street from the Back Bay Grill is the Portland vehicle maintenance depot where all the police cars fill up at the start of their shifts. There are regularly police vehicles in this area at any given time.
15-20 minutes after the explosion the Portland Police finally arrived. That would be just the police, no fire, no EMS, no sirens, no emergency flashing lights, just the police.
When Debbie saw the police arrive she went outside. She explained,
“The police officers shouted “Walk around, walk around, there is another one” and found yet another undetonated chemical bottle bomb underneath a taxicab in the parking lot.”
She points out that one of the policemen even commented,
“How lucky everyone was to have at least one member on the bomb squad on duty this evening, otherwise we probably couldn’t do anything… The bomb squad officer used a BB gun and shot a hole in the device to relieve the pressure so it didn’t detonate.”
In a later conversation Debbie told me that the bomb squad member was actually the head of the Portland bomb squad.
Her conversation with the police and their reaction was strange as well,
“I told the police that the first bomb “had exploded about ten feet in front of me”
“The police stated that clearly this was “kids being kids” and from the start I felt as if the police were belittling the situation.”
At this point Debbie went back inside the restaurant. She told me,
“When the manager came back he said that the police were speaking with the adults from the mosque and that they had given the plastic bottle back to the police.”
One very interesting side note here, over the last year Debbie has seen the back door of the mosque go from one regular back door to three security doors. She explained to me,
“There used to be just one door, they have added on two more doors, so now, where you used to go inside the mosque through one, you now have a security type area that when you enter it leads to another door.”
Remember, the back door leads to the parking area and according to everyone I have spoken with, the back door is the one that is always used.
This is important because according to Debbie the manager told her,
“It was very important to the Muslims that the Police enter through the front door out of respect. The Muslims told the Police that they don’t let anyone use the back door.
He also told me that the Muslims brought a child forward that admitted to making the bombs and showed the police inside the mosque what he used to make the bombs.
He said it was some sort of toilet bowl cleaner. I asked what kind and he said he would go look because the police had thrown everything in the Back Bay Grill dumpster. He pulled out a large plastic bottle of toilet bowl cleaner. I thought it was weird that the police had thrown everything in our dumpster.”
[I must be watching too much CSI, I thought the police would gather all the evidence, not throw it away, silly me.] Debbie told me how she felt,
“My husband and I felt that people needed to know about this. The police had said many times that it was just kids being kids but I was there. I experienced the explosion and it was much more than kids being kids. I felt that the other people and children around knew something was going to happen. There were too many adults around for it to be kids being kids. They watched it happen and then denied it to my face. Only when police pressed the issue did the Muslims admit that an explosion had happened and move forward with admitting to what happened.”
Debbie later suffered physical pain,
“The next morning my teeth, skull, eye sockets and ears hurt. They ached, but different from a headache.”
As Debbie explained to me, it wasn’t until Friday of that week that the detective interviewed her:
“I began to explain to Detective Murphy what happened. He stopped me in mid-sentence and told me “In their eyes, as a woman, you are a speck of dirt.” That bothered me but I tried to brush it off. I proceeded to tell my story to the detective; I signed a statement that Murphy had written. He told me he’d be working with the Juvenile Prosecutor Christine Thibeault to decide what charges the child would face.”
It appeared to me that Debbie and I were getting the same runaround, as she told me,
“I called detective Murphy after two weeks had passed. He told me he was still investigating and to speak with Christine Thibeault. I called Thibeault and she told me that this is how the system works and these things take time. Both the detective and the Juvenile prosecutor told me they would call me when they knew something more. I never received any calls.”
Jessica Fletcher where are you when we need you?
It is interesting that during my research I found that three teenagers, two juveniles and an adult were charged with six counts each of criminal use of explosives, a Class C felony by the same District Attorney less than 5 months earlier for the exact same type of bombs.
As I explained in my second article,
“A bomb is a bomb and the law is the law. Yes, I can understand that they would want to know what the bomb was made of, but if the components were needed in order to charge someone most other cases would go un-charged. I can hear it now on the news. A bomb went off today, police know who did it, but since there is nothing left the perpetrator will not be charged. Yeah, right.”
So, once again political correctness, or as I like to call it “political incorrectness” has run amuck. The D.A. is obviously dragging their feet over the prayer rug that the police swept the evidence under.
Can what happened to Debbie not be classified as a “hate crime”? She was the only non-Muslim there and the one in closest proximity to the bomb. Remember, at one point during an interview Detective Murphy stated to her “In their eyes, as a woman, you are a speck of dirt.”
He understood this aspect of Islam and yet threw away the evidence or allowed it to be thrown away?
Debbie explained to me that she even contacted the local office of the FBI,
“The agent on the telephone refused to give me his name but kept saying “it sounds like a local matter and you should contact the D.A.”
What? I know Jessica Fletcher would disapprove, but can I say WTF?
The FBI doesn’t care about bombs going off? Forget that it occurred outside a mosque, forget that the main Post Office, a Federal building (the Post Office) is less than a block away, and forget that a Muslim admitted to it, it was a bomb!
During my last conversation with D.A. Anderson she told me,
“The 13 year old is changing his story, now he says that he was cleaning inside the mosque the bottle started to bubble and he threw it out the window.”
Hmmm. So where did this second bottle that the police had to disable come from? The one that she said was disposed of that we later found out was thrown away by the Portland Police?
I relayed this conversation to Debbie and she laughed saying,
“That is physically impossible since there are no windows in the mosque that look out in to the parking lot.”
There is much more, read it all here.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Saturday, October 23, 2010 at 04:56 PM | Permalink | Comments (22) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
LEFTIST/ISLAMIC CABAL TARGETS/BLACKLISTS AWARD-WINNING WRITER, FEMINIST/MARINE FOR GROUND ZERO MOSQUE COMMENT: IN DEFENSE OF ELIZABETH MOON
And so it begins. Yesterday, the Muslim Brotherhood fired Juan Williams, and they will destroy anyone else who stands in the way of their stated goal, "to eliminate and destroy Western Civilization from within."
Needless to say, the leftist/Islamic alliance has been doing this to me and Spencer, Ibn Warraq, Bat Ye'or et al for years. They will go after everyone who does not agree to their subjugation, suprression and slavery.
Be warned. It is a war. Over at This Ain't Hell:
Marine Science Fiction Writer Blacklisted for Comments On Islamic Center
In Defense of Elizabeth Moon
Elizabeth Moon is a pretty extraordinary woman. She made the decision to join the Marine Corps as an officer during the Vietnam War, at a time many men were unwilling to. She is the child of a single parent, and an utterly self-made woman with multiple college degrees. She is also the mother of an autistic child and has done some pretty impressive advocating for disabled children. She writes some great Military Science Fiction books, with strong female characters-because she knows from experience that women can be a lot of pretty amazing things. Moon exemplifies in many ways what I think of as feminism-that any woman can and should have the ability to be whatever she wants to be, from serving her country to being a mother-tigress.
To this end, she was chosen as a Guest of Honor at Wiscon, a feminist science fiction convention. This was an excellent choice-she started writing early on in a field where there were few women writers, and she’s pretty consistently been a supportive voice for them, while declaring that to be a feminist means you believe women are strong.
All was well…until, on her own personal blog, she made a 9/11 post about the proposed Islamic Center in NYC, and overall, about immigrant assimilation in America.
Groups that self-isolate, that determinedly distinguish themselves by location, by language, by dress, will not be accepted as readily as those that plunge into the mainstream. This is not just an American problem–this is human nature, the tribalism that underlies all societies and must be constantly curtailed if larger groups are to co-exist. It is natural to want to be around those who talk like you, eat the familiar foods, wear the familiar clothes, have the familiar cultural references. But in a multicultural society like ours–and it has been multi-cultural from its inception–citizens need to go beyond nature. That includes those who by their history find it least comfortable.
[...]
What appears to have spelled her doom, however, was the following:
I can easily imagine how Muslims would react to my excusing the Crusades on the basis of Islamic aggression from 600 to 1000 C.E….(for instance, excusing the building of a church on the site of a mosque in Cordoba after the Reconquista by reminding them of the mosque built on the site of an important early Christian church in Antioch.) So I don’t give that lecture to the innocent Muslims I come in contact with. I would appreciate the same courtesy in return (and don’t get it.) The same with other points of Islam that I find appalling (especially as a free woman) and totally against those basic principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution…I feel that I personally (and many others) lean over backwards to put up with these things, to let Muslims believe stuff that unfits them for citizenship, on the grounds of their personal freedom.
Immediately an outcry rose up among some. Elizabeth Moon didn’t just disagree, she was racist. (Never mind the fact that Islam is a religion, not a race). The mere fact that she happened to find portions of Islamic practice objectionable, as a feminist,was used as a reason to get the tar and feathers ready. And hundreds of posts later from the slavering hordes, the nonprofit responsible for WisCon, SF3, overrode the committee, broke their contract with her, and disinvited her as Guest of Honor. Now this isn’t just some trivial thing-appearing as a Guest of Honor is a contract between the author and the convention. The author commits to coming, clearing their schedule and turning down other events they could be doing that weekend, and in return, the convention sometimes pays them, and generally pays for their plane tickets, hotel rooms, etc. So in essence, they’ve screwed her over, because they thought it was easier to let a respected military science fiction writer hang than to get accused of racism. There’s also been talk from other sides of instituting boycotts against her, shunning her, having people stalk her around the convention if she shows up just to tell her how much they hate her, and other things.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Saturday, October 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM in Ground Zero Mega Mosque: Takbir! | Permalink | Comments (25) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD CONGRESSMAN KEITH ELLISON SMEARS JUAN WILLIAMS AS "UN-AMERICAN"
The Muslim Brotherhood's man in Congress is calling a black American a "bigot" and "un-American," twisting the very definition of "American" to some perverted idea of sharia. This from an organization whose stated aim is "eliminating and destroying Western Civilization from within."
America, pay attention! The traitors who walk among us are removing their masks. See who conspires against us. See who sides with our mortal enemies.
Considering the notorious Islamic history of Muslims keeping blacks as slaves (abid) -- to this very day in North Africa -- it is the height of black humor (no pun intended) that this Islamic supremacist would call an honorable African American a "bigot."
Keith Ellison's trip to the haj was financed by the Muslim Brotherhood. Keith Ellison has attended pro-Hamas, anti-semitic hatefests. And it was Hamas-supporting Muslim Brotherhood CAIR that got Williams fired. Why isn't the media discussing how these extremists, like Ellison, are destroying this country?
To Williams' point, we have an entire government agency, the TSA (Transportation Security Administration), dedicated to protecting us from terrorists who are largely Muslim. We have torturous security procedures at every stage of air travel. We bear unfathomable costs in taxpayer dollars, but worse, in the surrender of privacy and individual rights because of Islamic jihad: because of the 911 Muslim terrorists, and the up to 18 British Muslims who planned to blow up seven planes and kill 4,000 Americans and/or British people in the name of Islam in 2006, and because of Richard Reid, the Muslim with the exploding shoes, and the Christmas day bomber, the Muslim with the exploding crotch.
Ellison is an extremist and should be on the terrorist watch list.
Representative Keith Ellison; Juan Williams is Un-American
“It’s just an ugly, bigoted statement… In exchange for his bigotry was able to get a $2 million contract… He should apologize profusely… I think it’s un-American what Juan Williams said.”
"Juan Williams contributes to profiling and harassing Americans," Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) said.
NPR is "well within its rights" to fire him from their "good news service."
Posted by Pamela Geller on Saturday, October 23, 2010 at 11:29 AM in FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE AGE OF JIHAD, Infiltration | Permalink | Comments (68) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
Friday, October 22, 2010
DUSTING OFF AN OPEN THREAD
VIDEO: SEXUALLY MOLESTING YOUNG BOYS IN ISLAM
Video: Imam caught sexually groping boy in mosque during prayers back in August.
The video is not related to the story below, though it appears to be systemic, Afghanistan's dancing boys notwithstanding. These accused devout Muslims teach "Islamic lessons" at the centre.
It is a brutal story involving 12 children, and includes allegations that dogs were allegedly set upon victims.
The accused were arrested, charged, and ordered to hand in their passports, and are now out on bail.
Turkish missionaries 'molest' boys News 24
Polokwane - Three Turkish missionaries, who teach Islamic lessons at an aftercare centre in Polokwane, have been arrested for allegedly assaulting and molesting under-age boys. The three young men appeared in the Polokwane Magistrate's Court on Wednesday on charges of assault, assault with the intent to inflict grievous bodily harm and contravention of the Sexual Offences Act.
The men, aged 24, 22 and 19, were arrested on Monday after a police investigation. According to the law, they may not be identified because they have yet to plead on the sexual charges against them.
12 complainants
Twelve of the boys who attend the centre are complainants in the case.
The boys, aged between 11 and 14, all come from previously disadvantaged communities in Limpopo, and they all come from poor families.
They are alleging that they were beaten and that the men apparently also set dogs loose on them. The boys also allege the men kissed and molested them.
Andries Rheeder, the men's legal representative, said during their bail application that all the pupils have since been removed from the aftercare centre.
They are currently in a place of safety. The boys were also taken to a hospital for medical examinations earlier this week. The men have been involved in the aftercare centre for the past two years. They also live there, and apparently transport the children to and from the primary school every day.
Can't speak English
After school, they teach the children about the Islamic faith.
The men can't speak or understand English at all. Court proceedings had to be translated into Turkish for them.State prosecutor Alice Lekganyane did not oppose bail. The men have to hand in their passports. Magistrate Janine Ungerer postponed the case to December 2 for further investigation.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 07:27 PM | Permalink | Comments (29) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
VATICAN: KORAN ENCOURAGES 'KILLING CHRISTIANS'
Millions of dead Christians later.....finally, real "dialogue." Now, duck!
Vatican: Koran encourages 'killing Christians' AKI
Vatican City, 22 Oct. (AKI) - The Koran is a text that encourages Islam to impose itself with force and permits the killing of Christians, said Lebanon's Catholic Patriarch of Antioch Archbishop Raboula Beylouni, addressing a Vatican meeting of Middle East bishops.
"The Koran gives Muslims the right to judge Christians and kill them with Jihad," he said. "It gives orders to impose religion with force, with the sword. For this reason, Muslims don't recognise the freedom of religion among themselves or others."
Pope Benedict XVI on 11 Oct. the opened the two-week-long meeting of 246 Middle East bishops and other religious leaders by lashing out against violence "in God's name".
The pontiff warned delegates to guard against the spread of "terrorist ideology" in the modern world.
Among clerics attending the meeting were Muhammad al-Sammak, political counsellor to the Grand Mufti of Lebanon, representing Sunni Islam; and Ayatollah Seyed Mostafa Mohaghegh Ahmadabadi, a law professor at the Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran and member of the Iranian Academy of Sciences, representing Shia Islam.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 05:21 PM in The Truth About Islam | Permalink | Comments (50) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
AS FEARED: LONDON BOROUGH BECOMES 'ISLAMIC REPUBLIC'
As predicted here at Atlas, the vile Islamic supremacist, through massive voter fraud (isn't always how they get their way?), has taken the election.
In my New York Times interview here, I repeated what I have said and thought for some time -- that the first country that will be Islamic in Europe will be the U.K. This terrible election victory just validates my prediction. An Islamic supremacist with fundamentalist links was elected Executive Mayor of Tower Hamlet council, with control of over a billion dollar budget.
Mind you, he was previously fired for extremist ties. But the Islamic machine went into overdrive and fraudulently gamed the system. Tower Hamlets moved from a conventional leader system to a mayoralty this year as a result of a campaign spearheaded by the Muslim extremsit group the IFE. IFE's Abu Talha told an undercover reporter for The Sunday Telegraph and Channel 4's Dispatches: "The mayor is going to have a lot more control. That's why we need to get someone, one of our brothers, in there. Which we will do."
And they did.
Labour: London borough becomes 'Islamic republic' Telegraph
Outside the Wellington Way polling station in Tower Hamlets yesterday, as at many other polling stations in the borough, people had to run a gauntlet of Lutfur Rahman supporters to reach the ballot box. As one Bengali woman voter went past them, we heard one of the Rahman army scolding her for her “immodest dress.”
That incident is perhaps a tiny taste of the future for Britain’s poorest borough now it has elected Mr Rahman as its first executive mayor, with almost total power over its £1 billion budget. At the count last night, one very senior figure in the Tower Hamlets Labour Party said: “It really is Britain’s Islamic republic now.”
For the last eight months – without complaint or challenge from Mr Rahman – this blog and newspaper have laid out his close links with a group of powerful local businessmen and with a Muslim supremacist body, the Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE) - which believes, in its own words, in transforming the “very infrastructure of society, its institutions, its culture, its political order and its creed… from ignorance to Islam.” Mr Rahman has refused to deny these claims.
We have told how the borough’s change from a conventional council leader to a mayoral system came about as a result of acampaign led and financed by these two groups – and how the IFE, in its words, wanted to “get one of our brothers” into the position.
We have described in detail, again without complaint or challenge by Mr Rahman, his deeply problematic two years as council leader until he was removed from that post six months ago, partly as a result of our investigations. After he secured the leadership with the help of the IFE, millions of pounds were channelled to front organisations of the IFE, a man with close links to the IFE was appointed as assistant chief executive of the council despite being unqualified for the position and the secular, white chief executive was forced out. Various efforts were made to “Islamicise” the borough. Extremist literature was stocked in Tower Hamlets’ public libraries.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 05:02 PM in Eurabia 2010, Eurabia: Dhimmitude | Permalink | Comments (37) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
VICTORY! JUDGES DISMISSED, NEW TRIAL ORDERED FOR GEERT WILDERS!
"NEWSPAPER DE PERS: JUDGE SCHALKEN OF THE AMSTERDAM COURT TRIED TO INFLUENCE EXPERT WITNESS HANS JANSEN DURING A DINNER. MAFIAPRACTICE."
This is a huge vitory. Wilders always argued that the three judges on this case were biased. Today three other judges ruled that the court had given a semblance of partiality. The case now has to start again with other judges. This will probably take months. And while it is true that these new judges might rule against Geert but with the public prosecutor demanding acquittal there is a much better chance that an unbiased court will acquit Wilders.
The relentless persecution and harassment of Geert Wilders is symbolic of freedom's struggle against the forces of oppression and evil. These are trumped-up charges in a kangeroo court hellbent on jailing one of the world's leading defenders of freedom and western values. On trial with Wilders is Churchill, Locke, Burke, Rand, Washington, and every individual who advanced liberty over slavery, individualism over collectivism, freedom over oppression.
"Newspaper De Pers: Judge Schalken of the Amsterdam court tried to influence expert witness Hans Jansen during a dinner. Mafiapractice."
-- Geert Wilders @Twitter
New trial ordered for Geert Wilders, the entire three-judge panel was dismissed on the following grounds:
- Remarks of judge Jan Moorse on Wilders usage of his right to remain silent
- Remarks by judge Jan Moorse that gave a value statement on Fitna
- The court’s rejection of hearing a key witness Mr. Hans Jansen again on how judge Schalken tried to influence him before the trial (hat tip Her Royal Whyness)
AND
During the deliberation time of the substitution court Wilders has filed charges at a local police station against Judge Tom Schalken for trying to influence a court expert witness. (more here at Klein Verzet)
Today Wilders accused Judge Tom Schalken of the Amterdam court that ordered the trial against him of mafia practices.
"Newspaper De Pers: Judge Schalken of the Amsterdam court tried to influence expert witness Hans Jansen during a dinner. Mafiapractice."Newspaper De Pers today ran a story (NL) about expert witness Hans Jansen. It's about a blog posting of yesterday by Hans Jansen, who is a regular contributor of the Dutch group blog named Hoeiboei (NL). In yesterdays blog post Jansen wrote about a dinner for which he was invited only three days before his expert witness testimony in the trial against Geert Wilders (translation of this blog post by Hans Jansen here: Judge Schalken).
--Geert Wilders @Twitter
Hans Jansen was invited to a dinner by a 50 year old friend, Bertus Hendriks (NL), the friend however is also a leftwing activist for the Palestinan cause. Unknown to Hans Jansen were the other invited guests. It turned out several were judges and prosecutors, one of them was Tom Schalken. Of course Tom Schalken is not just a judge, he is one of the three judges who ordered the trial against Geert Wilders. During the dinner the judge repeatedly steered the conversation with Jansen to the Wilders trial. The judge clearly wanted to talk about it with Hans Jansen and influence his opinions about the trial. But Hans Jansen writes he was not very impressed by his obviously fake friendly way of convincing him.
In a way that can only add to conspiratorial mindset about this trial Judge Tom Schalken confirmed the dinner, and said there was not illegal about it. What was against the rules was that Hans Jansen spoke about the dinner publicly."I don’t know about the values at the Amsterdam judiciary. But it shows a bit, if I may use layman terms, that the court that ordered the prosecution of Wilders are a bit legal punks, not people with descent manners"
-- Hans Jansen @ Pow News on National Television yesterday about the dinner
The story has received wide public attention. Thus when todays trial begun, defense lawyer Moszkowicz refered to the press stories and asked the court to hear Mr. Hans Jansen again in court. The prosecution objected and argues that the incident was after the court ruled to prosecute Wilders and thus the incident was of no influence of prejudiced of judge Schalken. But Moszkowicz countered that he also wanted to know if the judge has tried to influence an expert witness in this trial and that his behavior could also clarify his earlier behavior in the court ruling that ordered the prosecution of Wilders.
Although, Hans Jansen was present in the court, the court rejected the request without motivation but in a rather cryptic way. They court said something like: they will not hear Mr. Jansen today, but that the issue will stay part of their deliberations and that they might hear him later if they deem that necessary.
After a short deliberation defense lawyer Moszkowicz requested for the second time a substitution court (Dutch: 'wraking') to ask for the disqualification of this court on grounds that he may not hear a key witness in this trial that can proof the innocence of Mr. Wilders and thus the defense can no longer assume the court is without prejudiced against Mr. Wilders.
The court of substitution is of course also an Amsterdam court. Thus the court of substitution is filled with the colleagues of the current court and with colleagues of the court that ordered the prosecution against Mr. Wilders. The question now is, how many dinner guest of Hans Jansen will be on this court?
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 01:39 PM in GEERT WILDERS: FITNA | Permalink | Comments (18) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
"ISLAM WEEK OF DIALOGUE": PAMELA GELLER, "THERE HAS NOT BEEN ONE INSTANCE THAT THEY RECONSIDERED GROUND ZERO MOSQUE. I DON'T THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED AN EDUCATION. I THINK THAT THE ISLAMIC SUPREMACISTS NEED SOME SENSITIVITY TRAINING."
How to battle fear and hatred of Islam? For dozens of mosques around the U.S. this week, one strategy has been to host open houses for non-Muslims that also aim at building religious relationships.[...]For many, the visit has been their first time at a mosque, Uddin said, and "some are shocked to know that a Muslim could not be a Muslim until he/she believes in Jesus, Moses and Jacob."
No, I think their shock is more about the fact that Muslims are taught that Jesus, Moses, and Jacob were Muslims. But MSNBC doesn't report that. This is a news story dripping with this Islamic dawah and supremacist propaganda.
Q&A about Islam Check out MSNBC here.
Msnbc.com invited Shakeel Syed, executive director of the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California, to take reader questions about the Islamic faith. This chat is moderated and will begin at noon ET. As many questions as possible will be answered within the time allotted.
Extremist television. Broadcast news dawah. Check the above link: there is a "cover it live" dialogue box, I kid you not. A coalition of extremist Muslim groups called for "interfaith dialogue" to show their support for the right to build a mega-mosque at Ground Zero. They called for a "week of dialogue" on the weekend of Oct. 22-24. And the media is all over like white on rice.
I spoke with Lauren Green of FOX News (below) on this latest propaganda attack on the American people by extremist Muslim groups. This relentless re-education/dawah (proselytizing to Islam) practiced on the American psyche is outrageous. Using our broadcast media to proselytize for Islam. Why do non-believers have to be subjected to this constant dawah and Islamic propaganda whitewashing of the most radical, intolerant ideology on earth? Did you ever see this for Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddism, Scientology? And those religions/ideologies have not engaged in a relentless, brutal war against the West, the world, and their own moderates.
The American people are sick of being deceived and misled. Stop talking, start acting. Let's see Muslim supremacist groups lay down their arms against those of us who are exposing and reporting on jihad, and instead take up the fight against the jihadist "fringe" that is at war with the West. Why is Geller or Spencer their target? Why aren't the Muslim "extremists" their target?
This is all about the Ground Zero victory mosque. Notice how they all close ranks and make it about "Islamophobia," when everyone knows it is a deeply offensive, deliberately provocative act. Opposition to the mosque is not "Islamophobia," it's "Islamorealism" (hat tip to Spencer, who coined that term years ago).
The Ground Zero islamic supremacist mosque is a horrible idea. But the pain experienced by non-Muslims and Muslims of conscience is treated with contempt by these Muslim extremist groups. The 70% of Americans are looked down upon with disdain by these Islamic supremacists. The Cordoba House is a 16-story middle finger to the America. And yet they dig in their heels and no one goes off the reservation -- exactly the same modus operandi of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, the 57-government bloc of Islamic nations.
Get your teeth out of our neck.
Mosques Open Their Doors to Neighbors in Effort to Win Over Skeptics FOX NEWS Lauren GreenThe prayers, the Koran and the people. They're the three things Muslims would like Americans to know about.
Really? Says who?
To counter negative stereotypes, Muslim leaders nationwide are flinging open the doors to their mosques, hoping to present a positive image of Islam.
"The main thing is to open the doors and to share with people, to clarify who we are so people have no fears, so we can develop stronger relationships overall," says Imam Al-Amin Abdul Latif of the Islamic Leadership Council of New York.
Non-believers are not allowed to pray in mosques. The only time non-Muslims are invited into mosques is for prosylytizing, "inviting people to islam, aka conversion."
Christine Earls of Islip, N.Y., came to an open house at the Muslim Center of Long Island. "I was always interested in the mosque and I wanted to be more educated about it," she said.
That's exactly the type of response Muslims are looking for -- people who are seekers, curious about their Muslim neighbors.
The neighborly hospitality is certainly part of the effort, but its fundamental impetus is to combat widespread opposition to building an Islamic cultural center and mosque two blocks from Ground Zero. And it's a hard task, indeed. A Fox News Opinion Dynamics Poll shows 61 percent – other polls put the figure as high as 70 percent -- oppose building a mosque so close to the site of the worst terror attack on U.S. soil, an attack that was perpetrated by Muslim extremists.
Dr. Hafiz Rehman, who hosted the Long Island event, says, "On 9/11 the planes were hijacked and the religion was hijacked. We want to build close to there so people know Muslims are mainstream Americans also."
It will be an uphill battle.
Pamela Geller, head of Stop Islamization of America, sees a sinister purpose behind the open-house PR campaign: "Dawa, proselytizing to Islam, bringing people to Islam to convert," she says.
"This is not about sensitivity. There has not been one instance that they reconsidered Ground Zero Mosque…. I don't think the American people need an education. I think that the Islamic supremacists need some sensitivity training."
But Latif maintains that this is about more than the Ground Zero Mosque. It's about conflicts over mosques across the country.
According to the Pew Forum, there have been 35 proposed mosques or Islamic centers that have encountered community opposition in the last two years, including mosques in Murfreesboro, Tenn., Portland, Maine, and Green Bay, Wis. Some people in those communities object to what seems to them like a sudden tide of new Islamic houses of worship. And that may not be too far from fact: the Pew Forum numbers show that in the last decade, there's been a more than 50 percent increase in the number of mosques in the U.S. -- from 1,209 in 2000, to 1,897 in 2010.
Geller's organization has become the biggest thorn in the side of Muslim groups like Latif's. She's helped stage protests against the Ground Zero Mosque and has taken out ads on buses and taxis that blast Islam.
"We're trying to thwart and stymie their influence," Latif says. "We don't control the media, so we figure we'll open up the mosques."
The effort, at least for now, may be working. Anthony Quintal of Bay Shore, L.I., came away saying only positive things about his visit to an area mosque.
"Contrary to what some people may think, they are just like any other faith or religion," he said. "There is good and bad in all types of people."
But they do control the media -- ask Juan Williams.
But they do control the media -- if Spencer and I instituted a "Counter-Jihad Awareness Week," do you think the media would swarm to cover it like they do this insulting dawah and whitewash?
"This might indeed be another teachable moment for America," said Mahdi Bray, executive director of a Washington, D.C.-based group called Muslim American Society Freedom. (here)
Mahdi Bray is a notorious radical representing the public face of the Muslim Brotherhood in America. This is who is "teaching" us?
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 01:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (31) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
RWN: THE DAVID HOROWITZ INTERVIEW
Excellent, must-read interview over at Right Wing News with the inestimable David Horowitz. Horowitz is a national treasure.
Here are a couple of pearls from the interview:
Horowitz on how conservatives don't pay attention to education:
Although, I have to say in the seven years I've done my campaign, the left wing press has covered me extensively. I mean there have been hundreds, even thousands of articles about the campaign, but the Weekly Standard, National Review, zip, zero, nothing. Unless the Conservatives wake up and start addressing these issues, nothing is going to happen.
Horowitz on liberalism:
The enemies of having two sides to an argument are all called Liberals. So, the biggest misunderstanding about Liberalism is that in our time, liberals are imposters. They're pretending to be Liberal. but they're bigoted and intolerant.
Inside many Liberals is a totalitarian screaming to get out. They don't like to have another point of view in the room that they don't squash and the way they try to squash it is by character assassination and name calling. This is not a liberal mode of discourse. The kind of character assassination you see of every major conservative figure. ...That is such an intolerant attitude. I mean nobody worthy of the name liberal should have such an attitude, but they do.
Horowitz on Islam:
If you see Islam as parallel to Judaism, Christianity and Buddhism, you can't have an intelligent discussion about it. This is a religion whose founding figure was not a carpenter or a man of peace, but a warrior. He was a bloodthirsty warrior who murdered people -- and that's part of the religious cannon.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 12:14 PM in One of the Really Good Guys | Permalink | Comments (10) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
FOX BUSINESS: PAMELA GELLER ON THE THREAT TO OUR NATION'S WATER SUPPLY
In case you missed last night's Eric Bolling show, Follow the Money on Fox Business, Erick Stakelbeck joins me on the panel discussing the threat to our water supply by Muslim militants. It's an interesting discussion. Intelligent, informed, fact based -- unlike most of these nonsensical shows.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM in Atlas TV | Permalink | Comments (8) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
HAMAS-LINKED CAIR BLAMES GELLER FOR SHINING LIGHT ON HAMAS-LINKED ISNA
You must watch this video, which is entitled, "Bloggers are urging a Campbell Soup boycott over the company's 'halal' soup offerings in Canada. Amina Rubin, of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, and Sallie James, of the Cato Institute, share their reactions."
It's a mainstream media knee slapper (or head slapper). The more we catch the media fabricating and manufacturing a news narrative, the more derelict and reckless they become.
The entire piece is about me, a "Conservative blogger" who remains nameless until the hydra headed, Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood CAIR conspirator Amina Rubin names "Pamela Geller and her group" as responsible for the bias boycott. So if this is all about my action, why not have me on to explain my position and the the ISNA links to Hamas? The presentation of the entire action was fabricated out of whole cloth.
Why won't the media do its job? Investigate ISNA. Instead they accept, at face value, the CAIR representative's completely dishonest answer to this question:
CNBC: "Is there anything to the allegation that the organization has terrorist links?'
CAIR: "There is absolutely no truth to that. This really isn't about the organization certifying it. It's about the conservative blogger who is against this trying to find any excuse to stop anything Muslim in this country."
The anchor accepts that claim coming from another Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas-linked front. You can't make this stuff up. Did anyone look at the evidence that resulted in a 108-count indictment?
Hamas-linked CAIR rep continues:
This is a manufactured controversary. In this case Pamela Geller and her group are just taking this as an excuse, even a dietary accommodation they find to be threatening, they are trying to whip up fear about Muslim sin this country.
It gets worse. "Fear about being picked on or called a name......" How about fear of jihad, moron?
The completely uninformed anchor described the boycott as bigotry. This kind of feckless smear reporting should be drummed off the air. ISNA is a Muslim Brotherhood front (click the links at the bottom of this post). Why is the media carrying water for the most radical, intolerant ideology in the world? And the CATO rep was just as clueless.
Apart from the Hamas links to ISNA, there is a telling, terrible anecdote I have failed to note about ISNA-Canada. Atlas readers remember when I raised money for the Canadian honor killing victim Aqsa Parvez, who was lying in an unmarked grave. It is Islamic tradition not to mark the graves of "dishonored" murdered female relatives, because they are an embarrassment to the family. After raising the funds for Aqsa's headstone, picking and designing the stone and working with the cemetery, I was told that the family (that murdered Aqsa) would not "sign off on it." When I tried to buy the plot next to her, or behind or near her, I was told I would not be allowed to buy a plot, a stone, a tree, a bench, near beloved Aqsa. Why? Because "ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) owns owns them all." And they wouldn't allow it. We planted a grove of trees for Aqsa here, but know that's how inhuman and horrible ISNA was.
Here is a statement off ISNA, Canada's website:
Explanation of the ISNA Mission Statement
(http://www.isnacanada.com/about.html)
ISNA is founded on the teachings of Qur’an and Sunnah. Correct faith and correct understanding and practice of Shari’ah are the guiding principles of right and wrong. ISNA is, therefore, both inclusive and exclusive: inclusive in that it seeks the unity of all Muslims; exclusive in that the Muslim unity must be based on correct faith and sincere commitment to Islam as a total way of life.
FOLLOW THESE LINKS FOR ISNA'S HAMAS LINKS, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD RADICAL TIES;
http://www.investigativeproject.org/1078/isnas-reform-hasnt-shed-it-of-radical-ideologues
http://www.investigativeproject.org/2044/isna-conference-again-features-conspiracy-theories
http://www.steveemerson.com/docs/testimony/2005-07-13%20Testimony.pdf
http://www.investigativeproject.org/732/isna-admits-hamas-ties
http://www.investigativeproject.org/730/new-disclosures-tighten-isna-muslim-brotherhood-bonds
PREVIOUS ATLAS CAMPBELLS COLLABORATON WITH ISNA POSTS:
Campbell's Halal Blunder: Canadian Press In the Soup for Muslim Brotherhood
M-M-M-M-M-Muslim Brotherhood Good?
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 01:11 AM in Food jihad | Permalink | Comments (54) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
Thursday, October 21, 2010
THE REAL EXTREMISM
I am surfing the news channels and the net, and it's wall-to-wall coverage of the Juan Williams firing by the tools over at NPR, serving the hydra-headed Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood CAIR monster.
I am grateful for this high-profile incident. Much like the Ground Zero mosque, Americans have suddenly become aware of something quite terrible, a sea change, a profound transformation of a basic assumption, and a stunning reversal of their very basic unalienable rights. Their sensibilities are shaken. How could such a major seismic shift be kept hidden, kept so secret, until suddenly Juan Williams, a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, gets fired for telling the truth? Is it any wonder that recent polls show the majority of Americans no longer trust the media? That is a good thing.
And in watching the coverage of Williams affair, we witness, still, the fact that the media cannot face their own capitulation. It's all over the airwaves, but no one will discuss what is actually happening -- the loss of free speech to Islamic supremacism and domination. This is a deadly fight -- Islam in the West and its suppression of free speech.
When the horror of jihad is discussed, it is always in the context of the "fringe" committing violent jihad. The "extremists" are slaughtering people every day across the world in the name of Islam. But aren't those who are destroying our constitutional republic, shutting us down, attacking free speech and demonizing the good and the truth tellers the real extremists and radicals? Aren't CAIR, ISNA, MSA, MAS, ICNA, and NAIT the real extremists? The only difference between them and the military wing of Islam is their weapon of choice. Islamic supremacist groups in Western countries viciously attack our unalienable rights and chip away at our very foundation.
CAIR et al slaughter human thought.
They are destroyers and are as ruinous and destructive as their sister organizations Al Qaeda, Hezb'Allah, Hamas, Al-Muhajiroun, MILF, Fatah, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen, Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, Islamic Jihad, Armed Islamic Group, Sayyaf Group, Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin, Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, Caucasus Caliphate Jihad, the Chechen rebels, theUighurs, Turkish Hezbollah, Abu Musab, Al-Faruq Brigades, Al-Harakah al-Islamiyyah fi al-arak); Jamaat Ansar al-Sunna; the Mujahideen of the Victorious Sect (Mujahideen al ta’ifa al-Mansoura); the Mujahideen Battalions of the Salafi Group of Iraq (Kata’ib al mujahideen fi al-jama’ah al-salafiyah fi al-‘arak); the Jihad Brigades/Cell; "White Flags, Muslim Youth and Army of Mohammed", Ansar al-Islam, Fatah al-Islam, Fatah al-Intifada, et al.
This is war.
"The principle of free speech is not concerned with the content of a man's speech and does not protect only the expression of good ideas, but all ideas. If it were otherwise, who would determine which ideas are good and where forbidden? The government?"
"Once a country accepts censorship of the press and of speech, then nothing can be won without violence. Therefore, so long as you have free speech, protect it. This is the life-and-death issue in this country: do not give up the freedom of the press -- of newspapers, books, magazines, radio, movies, and other forms of presenting ideas. So long as that's free, a peaceful intellectual turn is possible." Ayn Rand
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 08:21 PM in CAIR: JIHAD IN AMERICA 2010 | Permalink | Comments (91) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
CANADA: CONFERENCE FACILITY CAVES TO ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM, BANS MARK STEYN
Freedom of speech in the age of jihad? There can be none. This is self-enforced sharia. And despite these enormous blows to free speech, still the media won't discuss it or cover it honestly, objectively.
Ontario: Conference facility caves to pressure from Islamic groups, bans Mark Steyn from speaking JihadwatchThis is what they do to anti-jihadists: they compile a dossier of lies, distortions, half-truths and spurious refutations of their work, circulate it to overworked, careless, and ideologically compromised mainstream media reporters, and use it to pressure groups not to invite anti-jihadists to speak or refer to their work. Their campaign of intimidation and marginalization is in line with the Organization of the Islamic Conference's agenda to choke off the freedom of speech regarding Islam in the West. Free Speech Death Watch Alert: "BREAKING: Conference facility caves to pressure from Islamic groups, bans Mark Steyn from speaking," by Andrew Lawton at Strictly Right, October 21:
Strictly Right sent out a press release earlier today to Canadian media with some rather startling news about the upcoming Mark Steyn speech in London, Ontario that we're putting together. Mark Steyn will be speaking on November 1st in a speech entitled "Head for the Hills: Why everything in your world is doomed." Apparently, London-area Muslims didn't like that idea too much.Due to capacity constraints at the University of Western Ontario, the original venue for the event, we had booked the London Convention Centre (LCC,) London's premiere conference facility. On Tuesday, I received a phone call from the LCC telling us that our venue had been pulled, and that Mark Steyn would not be permitted to speak there. The reason offered by the LCC was that they had received pressure from local Islamic groups, and they didn't want to alienate their Muslim clients. It's interesting to note that the LCC is owned by the City of London, and is therefore a government operation.
It's interesting that a government-run business decided that freedom of speech was no longer a concept to be upheld, and even more interesting is the fact that the Muslim community in London is applying pressure to a company to not entertain a speaker when only a day earlier they made a statement to the press saying that they didn't care about Steyn speaking and wouldn't do anything to counter it, (except "charity work.")...
Steyn's speech will, however, be going on. See here.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 07:38 PM in Free Speech Silenced, FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE AGE OF JIHAD | Permalink | Comments (10) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
NPR VIVIAN SCHILLER SHOULD BE FIRED FOR OFFENDING THE MENTALLY ILL
END TAYPAYER FUNDING FOR BIASED, OFFENSIVE PROPAGANDA MACHINE
NPR CEO Vivian Schiller should be fired for insulting and offending those with mental challenges.
On the Juan Wiliams firing here and here, NPR CEO Vivian Schiller said,
whatever feelings Williams has about Muslims should be between him and "his psychiatrist or his publicist — take your pick." (here.)
Juan Williams, "I am not a bigot"
It would be funny if it weren't real life. But it is, and our freedom of speech is being shredded -- get active. Fight supremacism. Join FDI/SIOA. Fight the leftist/Islamic machine.
Williams stood by his remarks Thursday. He told Fox News his statement was not bigoted, as he said NPR news executive Ellen Weiss implied Wednesday when she fired him by phone.
"I said, 'You mean I don't even get the chance to come in and we do this eyeball-to-eyeball, person-to-person, have a conversation? I've been there more than 10 years," Williams said. He said Weiss responded that "there's nothing you can say that would change my mind."
Your taxpayer dollars: Federal grants provide $3.3 million — of NPR's $166 million annual budget.
Leftwing billionaire George Soros’ recent $1.8 million donation to the organization have reignited calls to end NPR’s taxpayer subsidies (more).
In June, Colorado Republican Rep. Doug Lamborn introduced legislation that would end government funding
for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (the entity through which subsidies to NPR flow) after 2012. The bill’s passage did not stand a chance in the Democratic-controlled Congress, but the measure could gain momentum in a Republican-led House next year.Lamborn told The Daily Caller that there is no reason taxpayers should continue to subsidize an already-flush media company.
“This is an organization that can stand on its own. Why in the world, in the era of trillion dollar deficits, should the taxpayer have to subsidize it? It doesn’t make sense,” Lamborn said. “Under Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats just throw money at anything that’s moving. But if we have the honor of retaking Congress, we’re going to have to do things differently. I would love to defund NPR completely. Not because I don’t like it – actually there are things on NPR I do like – but because it can stand on its own.”
NPR receives grants from the quasi-governmental Corporation for Public Broadcasting and dues from local member stations, which are largely government
-funded. In an environment in which traditional news media outlets are heavily cutting back and even closing down, public radio is enjoying tremendous growth and adding new reporters to member stations across the country. Open Society Foundations, a Soros-funded organization that donates to liberal causes, announced this week an initiative to fund 100 new NPR reporters.
Where are the right-of-center news orgs? Basta!
Meanwhile, Williams snagged a two million dollar contract from Roger Ailes at FOX today.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 06:34 PM in FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE AGE OF JIHAD | Permalink | Comments (25) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
SILLY BILLY
O'Reilly has no clue what he is dealing with.
Bill O'Reilly Will Help Build Ground Zero Mosque If Imam Rauf Condemns 9/11 and 'The Jihad' (VIDEO)
Bill O'Reilly had Deepak Chopra on 'The O'Reilly Factor' (weekdays, 8PM ET) Tuesday, and during a discussion about O'Reilly's role in the Ground Zero Mosque controversy, Chopra revealed that he knew Daisy Khan, wife of Ground Zero mosque Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf.
O'Reilly had message for Chopra to deliver to Rauf through Khan:
"You tell him this. All Imam Rauf and his crew have to do is say 'we're going to dedicate this mosque -- community center -- to peace. And we are going to condemn what happened here on 9/11,"' O'Reilly stipulated. "(Then) I'll get a hammer and help them down there."
"I'm telling you, they're prepared to do that," Chopra responded.
As it stands, O'Reilly has tasked Chopra with bringing Imam Rauf onto 'The Factor,' where Rauf will presumably do his condemning, and then O'Reilly will presumably make plans to do his building.
Will this happen? Who knows. But there is no doubt O'Reilly is milking the whole Ground Zero Mosque thing for every last drop.
He doesn't know Rauf has done it already.
Now he will have to help build the mosque.
I can see the happy press conference where Bill takes a spade and does the groundbreaking, and makes a speech praising Rauf and moderate Islam..........
Uh....wait. Not so fast.
The Imam's response? Another giant middle finger .............
Irony: Mosque Imam Thinks O'Reilly Is 'Offensive' FOX Nation
Just when we thought the Bill O'Reilly-View dust-up might be dying down comes a statement from Feisal Rauf, imam of the Cordoba House at Park51, site of the proposed mosque two blocks away from Ground Zero in New York.
"Bill O'Reilly's remarks about Islam on The View were not helpful to the cause of mutual trust and understanding and only served to further fuel an irrational fear of Islam," says Rauf. "We all have a right to express our opinions. But we also have a responsibility to do so in a civil and respectful fashion."
He adds, "If future generations are to live in a safe and peaceful world, we must break the cycle of misunderstanding and mistrust that encourages extremism here and around the world. Mr. O'Reilly's uninformed comments were offensive, not only to his interviewers, but also to millions of American Muslims."
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 03:22 PM in Ground Zero Mega Mosque: Takbir! | Permalink | Comments (34) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
"ISLAM WEEK OF DIALOGUE": PAMELA GELLER, "THERE HAS NOT BEEN ONE INSTANCE THAT THEY RECONSIDERED GROUND ZERO MOSQUE. I DON'T THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED AN EDUCATION. I THINK THAT THE ISLAMIC SUPREMACISTS NEED SOME SENSITIVITY TRAINING."
How to battle fear and hatred of Islam? For dozens of mosques around the U.S. this week, one strategy has been to host open houses for non-Muslims that also aim at building religious relationships.[...]For many, the visit has been their first time at a mosque, Uddin said, and "some are shocked to know that a Muslim could not be a Muslim until he/she believes in Jesus, Moses and Jacob."
No, I think their shock is more about the fact that Muslims are taught that Jesus, Moses, and Jacob were Muslims. But MSNBC doesn't report that. This is a news story dripping with this Islamic dawah and supremacist propaganda.
Q&A about Islam Check out MSNBC here.
Msnbc.com invited Shakeel Syed, executive director of the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California, to take reader questions about the Islamic faith. This chat is moderated and will begin at noon ET. As many questions as possible will be answered within the time allotted.
Extremist television. Broadcast news dawah. Check the above link: there is a "cover it live" dialogue box, I kid you not. A coalition of extremist Muslim groups called for "interfaith dialogue" to show their support for the right to build a mega-mosque at Ground Zero. They called for a "week of dialogue" on the weekend of Oct. 22-24. And the media is all over like white on rice.
I spoke with Lauren Green of FOX News (below) on this latest propaganda attack on the American people by extremist Muslim groups. This relentless re-education/dawah (proselytizing to Islam) practiced on the American psyche is outrageous. Using our broadcast media to proselytize for Islam. Why do non-believers have to be subjected to this constant dawah and Islamic propaganda whitewashing of the most radical, intolerant ideology on earth? Did you ever see this for Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddism, Scientology? And those religions/ideologies have not engaged in a relentless, brutal war against the West, the world, and their own moderates.
The American people are sick of being deceived and misled. Stop talking, start acting. Let's see Muslim supremacist groups lay down their arms against those of us who are exposing and reporting on jihad, and instead take up the fight against the jihadist "fringe" that is at war with the West. Why is Geller or Spencer their target? Why aren't the Muslim "extremists" their target?
This is all about the Ground Zero victory mosque. Notice how they all close ranks and make it about "Islamophobia," when everyone knows it is a deeply offensive, deliberately provocative act. Opposition to the mosque is not "Islamophobia," it's "Islamorealism" (hat tip to Spencer, who coined that term years ago).
The Ground Zero islamic supremacist mosque is a horrible idea. But the pain experienced by non-Muslims and Muslims of conscience is treated with contempt by these Muslim extremist groups. The 70% of Americans are looked down upon with disdain by these Islamic supremacists. The Cordoba House is a 16-story middle finger to the America. And yet they dig in their heels and no one goes off the reservation -- exactly the same modus operandi of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, the 57-government bloc of Islamic nations.
Get your teeth out of our neck.
Mosques Open Their Doors to Neighbors in Effort to Win Over Skeptics FOX NEWS Lauren GreenThe prayers, the Koran and the people. They're the three things Muslims would like Americans to know about.
Really? Says who?
To counter negative stereotypes, Muslim leaders nationwide are flinging open the doors to their mosques, hoping to present a positive image of Islam.
"The main thing is to open the doors and to share with people, to clarify who we are so people have no fears, so we can develop stronger relationships overall," says Imam Al-Amin Abdul Latif of the Islamic Leadership Council of New York.
Non-believers are not allowed to pray in mosques. The only time non-Muslims are invited into mosques is for prosylytizing, "inviting people to islam, aka conversion."
Christine Earls of Islip, N.Y., came to an open house at the Muslim Center of Long Island. "I was always interested in the mosque and I wanted to be more educated about it," she said.
That's exactly the type of response Muslims are looking for -- people who are seekers, curious about their Muslim neighbors.
The neighborly hospitality is certainly part of the effort, but its fundamental impetus is to combat widespread opposition to building an Islamic cultural center and mosque two blocks from Ground Zero. And it's a hard task, indeed. A Fox News Opinion Dynamics Poll shows 61 percent – other polls put the figure as high as 70 percent -- oppose building a mosque so close to the site of the worst terror attack on U.S. soil, an attack that was perpetrated by Muslim extremists.
Dr. Hafiz Rehman, who hosted the Long Island event, says, "On 9/11 the planes were hijacked and the religion was hijacked. We want to build close to there so people know Muslims are mainstream Americans also."
It will be an uphill battle.
Pamela Geller, head of Stop Islamization of America, sees a sinister purpose behind the open-house PR campaign: "Dawa, proselytizing to Islam, bringing people to Islam to convert," she says.
"This is not about sensitivity. There has not been one instance that they reconsidered Ground Zero Mosque…. I don't think the American people need an education. I think that the Islamic supremacists need some sensitivity training."
But Latif maintains that this is about more than the Ground Zero Mosque. It's about conflicts over mosques across the country.
According to the Pew Forum, there have been 35 proposed mosques or Islamic centers that have encountered community opposition in the last two years, including mosques in Murfreesboro, Tenn., Portland, Maine, and Green Bay, Wis. Some people in those communities object to what seems to them like a sudden tide of new Islamic houses of worship. And that may not be too far from fact: the Pew Forum numbers show that in the last decade, there's been a more than 50 percent increase in the number of mosques in the U.S. -- from 1,209 in 2000, to 1,897 in 2010.
Geller's organization has become the biggest thorn in the side of Muslim groups like Latif's. She's helped stage protests against the Ground Zero Mosque and has taken out ads on buses and taxis that blast Islam.
"We're trying to thwart and stymie their influence," Latif says. "We don't control the media, so we figure we'll open up the mosques."
The effort, at least for now, may be working. Anthony Quintal of Bay Shore, L.I., came away saying only positive things about his visit to an area mosque.
"Contrary to what some people may think, they are just like any other faith or religion," he said. "There is good and bad in all types of people."
But they do control the media -- ask Juan Williams.
But they do control the media -- if Spencer and I instituted a "Counter-Jihad Awareness Week," do you think the media would swarm to cover it like they do this insulting dawah and whitewash?
"This might indeed be another teachable moment for America," said Mahdi Bray, executive director of a Washington, D.C.-based group called Muslim American Society Freedom. (here)
Mahdi Bray is a notorious radical representing the public face of the Muslim Brotherhood in America. This is who is "teaching" us?
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 01:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (31) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
RWN: THE DAVID HOROWITZ INTERVIEW
Excellent, must-read interview over at Right Wing News with the inestimable David Horowitz. Horowitz is a national treasure.
Here are a couple of pearls from the interview:
Horowitz on how conservatives don't pay attention to education:
Although, I have to say in the seven years I've done my campaign, the left wing press has covered me extensively. I mean there have been hundreds, even thousands of articles about the campaign, but the Weekly Standard, National Review, zip, zero, nothing. Unless the Conservatives wake up and start addressing these issues, nothing is going to happen.
Horowitz on liberalism:
The enemies of having two sides to an argument are all called Liberals. So, the biggest misunderstanding about Liberalism is that in our time, liberals are imposters. They're pretending to be Liberal. but they're bigoted and intolerant.
Inside many Liberals is a totalitarian screaming to get out. They don't like to have another point of view in the room that they don't squash and the way they try to squash it is by character assassination and name calling. This is not a liberal mode of discourse. The kind of character assassination you see of every major conservative figure. ...That is such an intolerant attitude. I mean nobody worthy of the name liberal should have such an attitude, but they do.
Horowitz on Islam:
If you see Islam as parallel to Judaism, Christianity and Buddhism, you can't have an intelligent discussion about it. This is a religion whose founding figure was not a carpenter or a man of peace, but a warrior. He was a bloodthirsty warrior who murdered people -- and that's part of the religious cannon.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 12:14 PM in One of the Really Good Guys | Permalink | Comments (10) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
FOX BUSINESS: PAMELA GELLER ON THE THREAT TO OUR NATION'S WATER SUPPLY
In case you missed last night's Eric Bolling show, Follow the Money on Fox Business, Erick Stakelbeck joins me on the panel discussing the threat to our water supply by Muslim militants. It's an interesting discussion. Intelligent, informed, fact based -- unlike most of these nonsensical shows.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM in Atlas TV | Permalink | Comments (8) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
HAMAS-LINKED CAIR BLAMES GELLER FOR SHINING LIGHT ON HAMAS-LINKED ISNA
You must watch this video, which is entitled, "Bloggers are urging a Campbell Soup boycott over the company's 'halal' soup offerings in Canada. Amina Rubin, of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, and Sallie James, of the Cato Institute, share their reactions."
It's a mainstream media knee slapper (or head slapper). The more we catch the media fabricating and manufacturing a news narrative, the more derelict and reckless they become.
The entire piece is about me, a "Conservative blogger" who remains nameless until the hydra headed, Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood CAIR conspirator Amina Rubin names "Pamela Geller and her group" as responsible for the bias boycott. So if this is all about my action, why not have me on to explain my position and the the ISNA links to Hamas? The presentation of the entire action was fabricated out of whole cloth.
Why won't the media do its job? Investigate ISNA. Instead they accept, at face value, the CAIR representative's completely dishonest answer to this question:
CNBC: "Is there anything to the allegation that the organization has terrorist links?'
CAIR: "There is absolutely no truth to that. This really isn't about the organization certifying it. It's about the conservative blogger who is against this trying to find any excuse to stop anything Muslim in this country."
The anchor accepts that claim coming from another Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas-linked front. You can't make this stuff up. Did anyone look at the evidence that resulted in a 108-count indictment?
Hamas-linked CAIR rep continues:
This is a manufactured controversary. In this case Pamela Geller and her group are just taking this as an excuse, even a dietary accommodation they find to be threatening, they are trying to whip up fear about Muslim sin this country.
It gets worse. "Fear about being picked on or called a name......" How about fear of jihad, moron?
The completely uninformed anchor described the boycott as bigotry. This kind of feckless smear reporting should be drummed off the air. ISNA is a Muslim Brotherhood front (click the links at the bottom of this post). Why is the media carrying water for the most radical, intolerant ideology in the world? And the CATO rep was just as clueless.
Apart from the Hamas links to ISNA, there is a telling, terrible anecdote I have failed to note about ISNA-Canada. Atlas readers remember when I raised money for the Canadian honor killing victim Aqsa Parvez, who was lying in an unmarked grave. It is Islamic tradition not to mark the graves of "dishonored" murdered female relatives, because they are an embarrassment to the family. After raising the funds for Aqsa's headstone, picking and designing the stone and working with the cemetery, I was told that the family (that murdered Aqsa) would not "sign off on it." When I tried to buy the plot next to her, or behind or near her, I was told I would not be allowed to buy a plot, a stone, a tree, a bench, near beloved Aqsa. Why? Because "ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) owns owns them all." And they wouldn't allow it. We planted a grove of trees for Aqsa here, but know that's how inhuman and horrible ISNA was.
Here is a statement off ISNA, Canada's website:
Explanation of the ISNA Mission Statement
(http://www.isnacanada.com/about.html)
ISNA is founded on the teachings of Qur’an and Sunnah. Correct faith and correct understanding and practice of Shari’ah are the guiding principles of right and wrong. ISNA is, therefore, both inclusive and exclusive: inclusive in that it seeks the unity of all Muslims; exclusive in that the Muslim unity must be based on correct faith and sincere commitment to Islam as a total way of life.
FOLLOW THESE LINKS FOR ISNA'S HAMAS LINKS, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD RADICAL TIES;
http://www.investigativeproject.org/1078/isnas-reform-hasnt-shed-it-of-radical-ideologues
http://www.investigativeproject.org/2044/isna-conference-again-features-conspiracy-theories
http://www.steveemerson.com/docs/testimony/2005-07-13%20Testimony.pdf
http://www.investigativeproject.org/732/isna-admits-hamas-ties
http://www.investigativeproject.org/730/new-disclosures-tighten-isna-muslim-brotherhood-bonds
PREVIOUS ATLAS CAMPBELLS COLLABORATON WITH ISNA POSTS:
Campbell's Halal Blunder: Canadian Press In the Soup for Muslim Brotherhood
M-M-M-M-M-Muslim Brotherhood Good?
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 01:11 AM in Food jihad | Permalink | Comments (54) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
Thursday, October 21, 2010
THE REAL EXTREMISM
I am surfing the news channels and the net, and it's wall-to-wall coverage of the Juan Williams firing by the tools over at NPR, serving the hydra-headed Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood CAIR monster.
I am grateful for this high-profile incident. Much like the Ground Zero mosque, Americans have suddenly become aware of something quite terrible, a sea change, a profound transformation of a basic assumption, and a stunning reversal of their very basic unalienable rights. Their sensibilities are shaken. How could such a major seismic shift be kept hidden, kept so secret, until suddenly Juan Williams, a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, gets fired for telling the truth? Is it any wonder that recent polls show the majority of Americans no longer trust the media? That is a good thing.
And in watching the coverage of Williams affair, we witness, still, the fact that the media cannot face their own capitulation. It's all over the airwaves, but no one will discuss what is actually happening -- the loss of free speech to Islamic supremacism and domination. This is a deadly fight -- Islam in the West and its suppression of free speech.
When the horror of jihad is discussed, it is always in the context of the "fringe" committing violent jihad. The "extremists" are slaughtering people every day across the world in the name of Islam. But aren't those who are destroying our constitutional republic, shutting us down, attacking free speech and demonizing the good and the truth tellers the real extremists and radicals? Aren't CAIR, ISNA, MSA, MAS, ICNA, and NAIT the real extremists? The only difference between them and the military wing of Islam is their weapon of choice. Islamic supremacist groups in Western countries viciously attack our unalienable rights and chip away at our very foundation.
CAIR et al slaughter human thought.
They are destroyers and are as ruinous and destructive as their sister organizations Al Qaeda, Hezb'Allah, Hamas, Al-Muhajiroun, MILF, Fatah, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen, Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, Islamic Jihad, Armed Islamic Group, Sayyaf Group, Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin, Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, Caucasus Caliphate Jihad, the Chechen rebels, theUighurs, Turkish Hezbollah, Abu Musab, Al-Faruq Brigades, Al-Harakah al-Islamiyyah fi al-arak); Jamaat Ansar al-Sunna; the Mujahideen of the Victorious Sect (Mujahideen al ta’ifa al-Mansoura); the Mujahideen Battalions of the Salafi Group of Iraq (Kata’ib al mujahideen fi al-jama’ah al-salafiyah fi al-‘arak); the Jihad Brigades/Cell; "White Flags, Muslim Youth and Army of Mohammed", Ansar al-Islam, Fatah al-Islam, Fatah al-Intifada, et al.
This is war.
"The principle of free speech is not concerned with the content of a man's speech and does not protect only the expression of good ideas, but all ideas. If it were otherwise, who would determine which ideas are good and where forbidden? The government?"
"Once a country accepts censorship of the press and of speech, then nothing can be won without violence. Therefore, so long as you have free speech, protect it. This is the life-and-death issue in this country: do not give up the freedom of the press -- of newspapers, books, magazines, radio, movies, and other forms of presenting ideas. So long as that's free, a peaceful intellectual turn is possible." Ayn Rand
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 08:21 PM in CAIR: JIHAD IN AMERICA 2010 | Permalink | Comments (91) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
CANADA: CONFERENCE FACILITY CAVES TO ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM, BANS MARK STEYN
Freedom of speech in the age of jihad? There can be none. This is self-enforced sharia. And despite these enormous blows to free speech, still the media won't discuss it or cover it honestly, objectively.
Ontario: Conference facility caves to pressure from Islamic groups, bans Mark Steyn from speaking JihadwatchThis is what they do to anti-jihadists: they compile a dossier of lies, distortions, half-truths and spurious refutations of their work, circulate it to overworked, careless, and ideologically compromised mainstream media reporters, and use it to pressure groups not to invite anti-jihadists to speak or refer to their work. Their campaign of intimidation and marginalization is in line with the Organization of the Islamic Conference's agenda to choke off the freedom of speech regarding Islam in the West. Free Speech Death Watch Alert: "BREAKING: Conference facility caves to pressure from Islamic groups, bans Mark Steyn from speaking," by Andrew Lawton at Strictly Right, October 21:
Strictly Right sent out a press release earlier today to Canadian media with some rather startling news about the upcoming Mark Steyn speech in London, Ontario that we're putting together. Mark Steyn will be speaking on November 1st in a speech entitled "Head for the Hills: Why everything in your world is doomed." Apparently, London-area Muslims didn't like that idea too much.Due to capacity constraints at the University of Western Ontario, the original venue for the event, we had booked the London Convention Centre (LCC,) London's premiere conference facility. On Tuesday, I received a phone call from the LCC telling us that our venue had been pulled, and that Mark Steyn would not be permitted to speak there. The reason offered by the LCC was that they had received pressure from local Islamic groups, and they didn't want to alienate their Muslim clients. It's interesting to note that the LCC is owned by the City of London, and is therefore a government operation.
It's interesting that a government-run business decided that freedom of speech was no longer a concept to be upheld, and even more interesting is the fact that the Muslim community in London is applying pressure to a company to not entertain a speaker when only a day earlier they made a statement to the press saying that they didn't care about Steyn speaking and wouldn't do anything to counter it, (except "charity work.")...
Steyn's speech will, however, be going on. See here.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 07:38 PM in Free Speech Silenced, FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE AGE OF JIHAD | Permalink | Comments (10) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
NPR VIVIAN SCHILLER SHOULD BE FIRED FOR OFFENDING THE MENTALLY ILL
END TAYPAYER FUNDING FOR BIASED, OFFENSIVE PROPAGANDA MACHINE
NPR CEO Vivian Schiller should be fired for insulting and offending those with mental challenges.
On the Juan Wiliams firing here and here, NPR CEO Vivian Schiller said,
whatever feelings Williams has about Muslims should be between him and "his psychiatrist or his publicist — take your pick." (here.)
Juan Williams, "I am not a bigot"
It would be funny if it weren't real life. But it is, and our freedom of speech is being shredded -- get active. Fight supremacism. Join FDI/SIOA. Fight the leftist/Islamic machine.
Williams stood by his remarks Thursday. He told Fox News his statement was not bigoted, as he said NPR news executive Ellen Weiss implied Wednesday when she fired him by phone.
"I said, 'You mean I don't even get the chance to come in and we do this eyeball-to-eyeball, person-to-person, have a conversation? I've been there more than 10 years," Williams said. He said Weiss responded that "there's nothing you can say that would change my mind."
Your taxpayer dollars: Federal grants provide $3.3 million — of NPR's $166 million annual budget.
Leftwing billionaire George Soros’ recent $1.8 million donation to the organization have reignited calls to end NPR’s taxpayer subsidies (more).
In June, Colorado Republican Rep. Doug Lamborn introduced legislation that would end government funding
for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (the entity through which subsidies to NPR flow) after 2012. The bill’s passage did not stand a chance in the Democratic-controlled Congress, but the measure could gain momentum in a Republican-led House next year.Lamborn told The Daily Caller that there is no reason taxpayers should continue to subsidize an already-flush media company.
“This is an organization that can stand on its own. Why in the world, in the era of trillion dollar deficits, should the taxpayer have to subsidize it? It doesn’t make sense,” Lamborn said. “Under Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats just throw money at anything that’s moving. But if we have the honor of retaking Congress, we’re going to have to do things differently. I would love to defund NPR completely. Not because I don’t like it – actually there are things on NPR I do like – but because it can stand on its own.”
NPR receives grants from the quasi-governmental Corporation for Public Broadcasting and dues from local member stations, which are largely government
-funded. In an environment in which traditional news media outlets are heavily cutting back and even closing down, public radio is enjoying tremendous growth and adding new reporters to member stations across the country. Open Society Foundations, a Soros-funded organization that donates to liberal causes, announced this week an initiative to fund 100 new NPR reporters.
Where are the right-of-center news orgs? Basta!
Meanwhile, Williams snagged a two million dollar contract from Roger Ailes at FOX today.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 06:34 PM in FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE AGE OF JIHAD | Permalink | Comments (25) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
SILLY BILLY
O'Reilly has no clue what he is dealing with.
Bill O'Reilly Will Help Build Ground Zero Mosque If Imam Rauf Condemns 9/11 and 'The Jihad' (VIDEO)
Bill O'Reilly had Deepak Chopra on 'The O'Reilly Factor' (weekdays, 8PM ET) Tuesday, and during a discussion about O'Reilly's role in the Ground Zero Mosque controversy, Chopra revealed that he knew Daisy Khan, wife of Ground Zero mosque Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf.
O'Reilly had message for Chopra to deliver to Rauf through Khan:
"You tell him this. All Imam Rauf and his crew have to do is say 'we're going to dedicate this mosque -- community center -- to peace. And we are going to condemn what happened here on 9/11,"' O'Reilly stipulated. "(Then) I'll get a hammer and help them down there."
"I'm telling you, they're prepared to do that," Chopra responded.
As it stands, O'Reilly has tasked Chopra with bringing Imam Rauf onto 'The Factor,' where Rauf will presumably do his condemning, and then O'Reilly will presumably make plans to do his building.
Will this happen? Who knows. But there is no doubt O'Reilly is milking the whole Ground Zero Mosque thing for every last drop.
He doesn't know Rauf has done it already.
Now he will have to help build the mosque.
I can see the happy press conference where Bill takes a spade and does the groundbreaking, and makes a speech praising Rauf and moderate Islam..........
Uh....wait. Not so fast.
The Imam's response? Another giant middle finger .............
Irony: Mosque Imam Thinks O'Reilly Is 'Offensive' FOX Nation
Just when we thought the Bill O'Reilly-View dust-up might be dying down comes a statement from Feisal Rauf, imam of the Cordoba House at Park51, site of the proposed mosque two blocks away from Ground Zero in New York.
"Bill O'Reilly's remarks about Islam on The View were not helpful to the cause of mutual trust and understanding and only served to further fuel an irrational fear of Islam," says Rauf. "We all have a right to express our opinions. But we also have a responsibility to do so in a civil and respectful fashion."
He adds, "If future generations are to live in a safe and peaceful world, we must break the cycle of misunderstanding and mistrust that encourages extremism here and around the world. Mr. O'Reilly's uninformed comments were offensive, not only to his interviewers, but also to millions of American Muslims."
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 03:22 PM in Ground Zero Mega Mosque: Takbir! | Permalink | Comments (34) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
HAMAS-LINKED, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD CAIR DEMAND FOR ACTION: JUAN WILLIAMS FIRED
Pamela Geller, "Truth is the new hate speech."
Juan Williams, "I was fired for telling the truth."
The jihadis are in charge. It's just that simple. The Islamic supremacists whose aim, according to an internal, captured document entered into the largest terror funding trial in this nation's history, demanded "something be done" to Juan Williams for admitting fear when he sees a jihadi (in "Muslim garb") on a plane.
Unindicted co-conspirator, Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood front CAIR sent this press release out on Wednesday afternoon. CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad called for action against Williams: "Such irresponsible and inflammatory comments would not be tolerated if they targeted any other racial, ethnic or religious minority, and they should not pass without action by NPR."
Williams is a liberal, and more times than not sides with the leftist/Islamic alliance. This is a lesson for the left, for the "queers for Palestine,' and the feminazis who stay silent in the wake of gender apartheid, clitorectomies, honor killings, etc. Know that you are next.
Williams' firing is not surprising. Anyone following the Islamic supremacist infiltration of the media, culture, and government have seen this for years. Last week's crippling cave-in to Islamic domination over at the Washington Post when they removed an online innocuous cartoon shows that free speech is being crushed.
When you trade freedom for peace, you get neither.
Unindicted co-conspirator, Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood front CAIR should be relegated to the very fringes of our society, like the KKK and the Nazis were. That's common sense. CAIR's subversion and treason goes back decades. The media is responsible for giving CAIR the imprimatur of legitimacy. FOX, CNN, MSNBC et al have these stealth jihadists on and never describe who and what they really are.
I am sure O'Reilly will be outraged on his show tonight -- Williams made these remarks on his show. But O'Reilly has had CAIR on and gave them a national stage and legitimacy.
Evil is made possible by the sanction you give it. Withdraw your sanction.
UPDATE: Here's Ibrahim Beekeeper Hooper, CAIR and Megyn Kelly on FOX:
Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood front CAIR shows its true face here, and demonstrates how it scams us. Anybody who doesn't submit to the Islamic supremacist dictates gets heckled. The insinuation is that Kelly is a racist-islamophobic-antimuslim-bigot. I don't know why Kelly didn't run down CAIR's rap sheet and who they really are.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 01:58 PM in CAIR: JIHAD IN AMERICA 2010, FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE AGE OF JIHAD | Permalink | Comments (82)ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
GROUND ZERO MOSQUE IMAM/SLUMLORD RAUF'S ARMANI SUITS, HOT ROD SPORTSCARS AND DAWAH
While Imam Rauf's slum tenants live in squalor.............
Imam Rauf waxes poetic on his favorite 'crafts": over at Forbes Designer clothes (hat tip Gulchgirl)
"I love clothing that exemplifies the philosophy of design. When you buy clothes of this high quality, they transcend their certain normal functions and are capable of simplifying one's life. For example, a well-cut suit fits better and a cashmere sweater is thin but keeps you warm. I am a man who takes great pleasure in wearing fine fabrics. I love Armani suits because Armani always uses the best fabrics. Also, of course, Brioni, the famous Italian designer, makes world-class suits with exquisite craftsmanship. My wife, Daisy, grew up in Kashmir, where you can find the world's finest cashmere scarves."
© Awad Awad /AFP/Getty ImagesRAUF: "Is there anything more alluring than a nicely engineered automobile? I currently drive a Lexus GS400 but am looking into the 2010 Mercedes E550. I like things of beauty--beauty in thought, beauty in spirit, beauty in creativity--and beauty in engineering is one of those things. I like a car that is beautiful, but also one that is functional, so I can use it all the time. I drive very often between our Manhattan apartment and our home in New Jersey. But if I could drive a car just on sunny, crisp Sunday afternoons, I would drive a Mercedes roadster."
RAUF: "Food preparation is about the art of quality. I agree with Julia Child who says, "You wouldn't cook a $30 lamb roast in a $15 dollar pan would you?" No, you wouldn't. A steak prepared to perfection has the ability to levitate a man, but a steak can also be cooked to taste like rubber."
All this while proselytizing to the clueless infidel readers:
RAUF: "....the difference between praying on a beautifully handcrafted Persian run and praying on an ordinary rug is like driving a Lexus vs. driving a dinky Ford. When it comes to rugs, like most works of art, it's a measure of quality that I look for. I own about 15 rugs, mostly prayer rugs, between my New York and New Jersey homes and about 15 more at my home in Malaysia. I love walking barefoot across a nice silk carpet because you can barely feel it. My favorite antique carpet is by Haji Jalili, one of the great carpet artists of the 19th century."
Rauf says,
"Something is fundamentally wrong right now," he says. "We are experiencing a crisis of commercial globalization, and we need one of spiritual globalization if we are going to heal."
A world living under Islam -- dar al islam. There are two worlds in Islam -- dar al Islam (house of Islam) and the rest, dar al harb (house of war). Spiritual globalization -- think about it.
And this from Daisy "the era of extremism is over" Khan:
"We enjoy our work so much," says Daisy, "That at any point in time we'd rather be working than anything else. We are having so much fun trying to heal the world."
Any more of their "healing" and we'll all need serious triage.
In a piece in Forbes late last year, (right before the Ground Zero Mosque was announced), Imam and slumlord Rauf extols the riches of fine living. Couture! Sports cars! Cuisine! And the world's finest prayer rugs (of course). This should solve the riddle of where our two million in taxpayer dollars were going, along with the million from the Dutch government, and his funding from Osama Bin Laden/AlQaeda-linked Saudi corporation XENEL, not to mention our funding his Middle East junkets.
While the tenants in Ground Zero mosque imam's slums in New Jersey suffer, Imam Rauf enjoys the finest offerings money can buy. Just last week, Rauf was summoned back to court (he didn't show, of course) as he was cited with more than 200 housing and health code violations over the past two months. A couple of months ago Union City filed suit against Rauf here.
The suit identified Rauf as the sole officer of Sage Development LLC, a company based at his home address in North Bergen and listed as the owner of the two buildings. The suit also alleges that Sage’s corporate status was revoked by the state in March 2005, for its failure to file annual reports.
The buildings occupy the same lot at 226 Central Ave., one containing 32 apartments and the other 16. The larger building has been vacant since Feb. 8, 2008, when a fire broke out there, one year after the city says it issued 12 separate fire code violations that Rauf ignored.
Rather than addressing the violations after the fire, the city says Rauf boarded up the building, barring residents from their apartments. A spokesman for Mayor Brian Stack said he could not immediately say what had become of the displaced families.
"He’s a terrible landlord who’s unresponsive to the residents who live in his building," said the spokesman, Mark Albiez.
Sewer pipes have not been not capped; also, an abandoned hot water heater in the basement could lead to a buildup of carbon monoxide in the building.
At buildings in Union City and Palisades Park, where Rauf reportedly got tax dollars to renovate low-income apartments, tenants said their gripes about their lousy housing conditions have been ignored.
"Why doesn't he help the tenants he has before he builds a new place, claiming he wants to help people?" said a disgusted Jamie Barillas, who lives in a Rauf-owned apartment at 2206 Central Ave. in Union City."Nothing gets done. We have to go through City Hall to get things done. . . . He doesn't care about his tenants," she said.
Barillas said that bedbugs plague the building -- but that when she tried to get building managers to respond, they claimed they didn't have the money to hire an exterminator.
Tenant Vilma Then chided Rauf as greedy.
"All he likes is money," she said. "Nothing ever gets fixed. I complain to the super, and all he says is that he has the same problem."
She also complained that Rauf's wife, Daisy Khan -- who has been the imam's spokesperson while he is touring overseas -- "listens to what you have to say and writes things down and leaves -- and nothing gets done."
"She gives nothing but false promises," the resident said.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 01:10 PM | Permalink | Comments (11) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
FOX BUSINESS TONIGHT: GELLER AT 8PM
I’ll be on the Follow the Money program on Fox Business tonight at 8 pm. We'll be talking about the jihadi threats against our nation's water supply.
Tune in, unless you want to watch that clip from The View again :)
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 11:51 AM in Atlas TV | Permalink | Comments (4) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
JIHAD IN THE PHILIPPINES: MUSLIMS BOMB BUS, 9 DEAD
Jihad here, jihad there, jihad jihad everywhere. But Ground Zero mega-mosquerader Daisy Kahn says, "the era of extremism is over,"and if you dare to disagree, you are a racist-islamophobic-anti-muslim-bigot. Got that?
Bus bomb kills nine in Philippines AFP hat tip MackieCOTABATO, Philippines — Nine people were killed on Thursday when a bomb exploded aboard a packed passenger bus in the troubled southern Philippines, authorities said.
The military and police said Muslim militants or bandits who are known to operate on the southern island of Mindanao could have been behind the attack, with extortion a possible motive.
"The bus company has long been receiving extortion letters from armed groups operating in the region," regional military spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Randolph Cabangbang said.
The bomb was apparently hidden inside a bag placed in a luggage compartment at the back of the bus, and exploded just after a group of men who were suspected to have planted it got off the vehicle, Cabangdang said.
Bus driver Arlan Tadeo, 38, who was unharmed in the incident, said there were 60 passengers on board when the explosion occurred.
"I saw in the rear-view mirror shattered blood-stained windows," he said.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 11:48 AM | Permalink | Comments (8) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
CAFE OWNER ORDERED TO REMOVE EXTRACTOR FAN BECAUSE NEIGHBOR CLAIMED 'SMELL OF FRYING BACON OFFENDS MUSLIMS'
Really nuts. The world is descending into madness, accommodating the most radical, intolerant ideology in the world. Go figure.
Cafe owner ordered to remove extractor fan because neighbour claimed 'smell of frying bacon offends Muslims' Daily Mail Online (hat tip WR)
A hard-working cafe owner has been ordered to tear down an extractor fan - because the smell of her frying bacon 'offends' Muslims. Planning bosses acted against Beverley Akciecek, 49, after being told her next-door neighbour's Muslim friends had felt 'physically sick' due to the 'foul odour'.
Councillors at Stockport Council in Greater Manchester say the smell from the fan is 'unacceptable on the grounds of residential amenity'.
Planning row: Cafe owner Beverley Akciecek has been ordered to tear down an extractor fan by the council because the smell of cooked bacon 'offends' Muslims
The fan has been in Beverley's Snack Shack takeaway in the Shaw Heath area of the town for the past three years.
Mrs Akciecek and her husband Cetin, 50, - himself a Turkish Muslim - work more than 50 hours a week buying, preparing and cooking hot and cold sandwiches and hot-pots for their customers.
Today mother-of-seven Mrs Akciecek said she plans to appeal against the decision.
She said: 'I just think it's crazy. Cetin's friends actually visit the shop, they're regular visitors, they're Muslim people, they come in a couple of times a week.
'I have Muslim people come in for cheese toasties. Cetin cooks the food himself, he cooks the bacon.
'When we go to a cafe my husband wouldn't be offended by the smell of bacon. His friends are not offended by it, we have three visitors who come here for a sandwich, friends of my husband, and the smell doesn't offend them at all.
'My brother-in-law doesn't flinch if he comes and we've just taken out three trays of bacon.
'I'm going to find a local councillor. I'm waiting for the letter so I can appeal.'
The couple took over the take-away in 2007 from the previous owner and replaced the existing extractor fan, which had been there for six years, with a new modern one.
They claim they received no complaints about the cafe which is open from 7.30am-2.30pm six days a week, until around 18 months ago when they received a letter from environmental services to say their neighbour Graham Webb-Lee had complained about the smell.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 11:42 AM in Eurabia: Dhimmitude | Permalink | Comments (18) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
CHRISTINE O'DONNELL: COWARDICE AND LACK OF CHARACTER
Stacy McCain comments further on Christine O'Donnell's gutless removal of my endorsement from her website after a rabid, lunatic post at the subversive Salon. Who are these people who pretend to represent decent, principled Americans? We need sterner stuff.
What surprised me was that a woman who has been the object of relentless attacks by those same folks would not know what this was and what they were trying to do. Who would know better that the insults were lies and distortions, a trap set to drive a wedge in our ranks? Mission accomplished. How could O'Donnell and/or her people not vet the post? No. She caved at once. C-A-V-E-D.
Remember, I endorsed O'Donnell back in the Spring, when no one even knew who she was. She wasn't even a blip on the internet radar screen, let alone the national scene. If she trashes her early supporters, won't she trash the voter? No loyalty, no spine, no character. It's lousy, and hardly instills a lot of confidence in the candidate.
Let me also say that they tried to pull this same stunt on Ilario Pantano back in September, when he spoke at my 911 Rally of Remembrance. He would have none of it. He kicked that trash to the curb. If you haven't donated to Pantano or volunteered for his campaign, go now. Clearly, the same goes for the magnificent Lt. Colonel Allen West. Donate now.
Stacy McCain weighs in here. He guesses O'Donnell "didn't know." Give me a break. You don't know what is going on in your own campaign? Then you're incompetent.
Basic Rule of Politics: Never Lose a Friend By Trying to Placate Your Enemies
Pamela Geller is a fighter who has encouraged and supported other fighters. Go back to March 2007, when she published a column by an Army officer deployed to Afghanistan whom she praised as representing “the best, the very best of America.”
Perhaps his name will ring a bell: Lt. Col. Allen B. West.
All patriots are now praying that Allen West is less than two weeks from being elected to Congress from the 22nd District of Florida. I first interviewed him in June 2008, at which time he couldn’t get the time of day from the national Republican establishment, but he always had the staunch support of Pamela Geller. She promoted his fundraising events and demanded that the GOP leadership wake the hell up and get behind his 2010 campaign.
Knowing how valuable Pamela’s support has been to Allen West and other candidates, I was stunned beyond words this morning when I received an e-mail alerting me that some idiot at Christine O’Donnell’s Senate campaign had decided it was a convenient time to throw Pamela Geller under the bus:
It is a pity that a “maverick” and “outsider” would lack any spine and exhibit such incredible political cowardice.
This was in response to a Salon item by ex-Wonkette Alex Pareene that repeated the now-familiar LGF-inspired defamations.
My dear friend Pamela Geller is entirely justified in feeling offended by this slight. Yet my guess is that her endorsement was removed from O’Donnell’s Web site without the knowledge or authorization of the candidate. Some gutless GOP staff puke, at the behest of a stupid consultant or “strategist,” decided to try to unring an Internet bell.
Yeah. Good luck with that, genius.
Permit me to refer you to an article by Ta-Nehisi Coates of the Atlantic Monthly, in which he talks about “the personal willingness to meet violence with violence” as a cultural marker of the “street mentality,” and observes that “the willingness to fight isn’t just about yourself, it’s a signal to your peer group”:
To the young people in my neighborhood, friendship was defined by having each other’s back.
Amen, Brother Coates. Having taken my share of abuse for instinctive displays of the Signifying Jive – is there really any need to explain? – I reckon the Street Code of West Baltimore isn’t much different than what my folks taught me growing up in Douglas County, Georgia: “Don’t ever start a fight, but don’t ever run away from a fight.”
Being a natural-born joker, I generally succeeded in averting violence through humor. But certainly the greater safeguards were (a) having an older brother who was notoriously willing to kick the ass of anyone who messed with me, and (b) being a known associate of redneck hooligans who would do the same.
The implicit bargain of what Ta-Nehisi Coastes calls the Street Code is that you sometimes have to take shit from your friends — who reserve the right to give you an ass-kicking when you deserve it — but you never have to take shit from your enemies. And as Coates says, the invaluable protection of your friends is dependent on your faithful observance of the street commandment:
Thou Shalt Not Be Found a Punk.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM in Critical Races | Permalink | Comments (37) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
"THE ERA OF EXTREMISM IS OVER," DECLARES DAISY KHAN IN 2008
Doha Debate Islamic Extremism (part 1 is here): Are Muslims failing to combat extremism?
Daisy Khan debates the question. Her position is opposed this idea of this question. I kid you not.
I like her look here: modern muslima, as opposed to her recent incarnation as a mother superior. (Video hat tip gulchgirl)
April 2008. War is deception -- so said Muhammad, the prophet for Muslims in an axiom best illustrated by Daisy Khan in this extraordinary exchange back in 2008. The era of extremism is over? You don't say! Tell that to the 166 precious souls who were slaughtered and sexually mutilated in Mumbai. Tell that to the Jews in the tiny state of Israel who are living under siege (gas masks within reach). Tell that to France, which is on high alert as we speak, or to the operators of the puppet shows that are attacked in Indonesia, or to the thousands of New Yorkers and tourists who would have been blown to smithereens by the Times Square bomber.
Tell that to the eleven devout Muslims who were recently arrested in the cities of Marseille, Aubagne, Marignane and Bordeaux for trafficking firearms and explosives, or to the teams of jihadists in Europe that are ready to deploy, or to those jihadis who perpetrated the attacks on NATO convoys, or to the Muslims plotting to launch Mumbai-style jihad massacres in Britain, France and Germany, or to the Canadian celebrity on "Canadian Idol" who was busted for jihad.
Tell that to the Christmas day bomber -a devout Muslim bomber from a well to do banking family who attempted to blow a plane mid-air carrying 300 people, or the operators of the jihad amusement park in Lebanon, or to the organizers of the jihad warship flotilla thatDaisy Khan's husband was involved with, or to the hundreds of Indonesian Christians who were slaughtered by Muslims in the war against the Christians, and to the hundreds of Christians murdered by Muslims in Nigeria, or to those murdered by Muslims in the deadly Uganda World Cup bombing. Or tell Hassan Abujihaad, a former U.S. Navy sailor from Phoenix, Arizona, who was convicted of supporting terrorism and disclosing classified information, including the location of Navy ships and their vulnerabilities, to Babar Ahmad and Syed Talha Ahsan, the alleged administrators of Azzam Publication Web sites (the London organization that provided material support and resources to terrorists).
And has Daisy spoken with the synagogue terror bombers who were convicted yesterday of plotting to blow up Jewish centers and shoot down planes at a nearby Air National Guard Base? Has she spoken with Najibullah Zazi (the Nazi), who, along with his jihad cell, purchased large quantities of chemicals, intending to bomb the NY subway system, stadiums, mass transit, hotels, and entertainment complexes (more here). Tell the Muslim woman who stabbed Labour MP Stephen Timms. Tell it to the undead Muslim leader, who said: "The time is very near when our fedayeen will attack the American states in the major cities," or to the female Muslims who blew themselves up on the Moscow subway. The death toll is 37. Tell the New Jersey Muslim arrested in an Al Qaeda shootout in Yemen, or the Muslims who murdered Christians and Buddhists in Bangladesh................. and this is just the last four months, click below for the rest:
So when she says that "the era of extremism is over," what does she actually mean? Whose "extremism," and by what defination? American extremism, aka self defense?
You won't be surprised at how she's characterized or the position she takes. She's not sitting on the fence about extremism, as she does when she speaks to an American audience. What I'd like to know is if this occurred at the same time that she told one of the Union City tenants that they couldn't pay for repairs because they were broke, or if it was at the time that they were put on notice of complaints by the city, or if it was around the time of that lawsuit about the down payment. Or the fire. Or who paid for her trip. Maybe it's as simple as cross-checking the known dates that Union City has or the court docket of the case that they settled.
Daisy says, "the era of extremism is ovuh!" More from The Religon of Peace.com
Islamic Terror Attacks for First Part of 2010
Islamic Terror Attacks for 2009
Islamic Terror Attacks for 2008
Islamic Terror Attacks for 2007
Islamic Terror Attacks for 2006
Islamic Terror Attacks for 2005
Continue reading ""The Era of Extremism is Over," Declares Daisy Khan in 2008" »
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 10:16 AM | Permalink | Comments (10) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!