OBAMA'S DEPARTMENT OF [IN]JUSTICE AND SHARIA PROSECUTES INFIDELS FOR "HATE" SPEECH CRIMES
And so it begins. This is an outrage. An infidel was prosecuted by Obama's Department of Justice and sent to jail for a year for saying in an email that he would “do WHATEVER it takes to eradicate Islam.” So what? A year in prison? A $3,000 fine?
We witnessed a traitorous Department of Justice refuse to prosecute the Black Panther party for voter harassment and intimidation with weapons on Election day. Senior DoJ lawyers resigned in protest.
"Obama has Violated His Oath of Office" in Racist Dept of Justice Decision to Drop New Black Panther Party Voter Intimidation Case and Mandate DOJ Policy: "No Voter Intimidation Cases Will Brought Against Black Defendent Where the Victim is White"(read it at Atlas Shrugs)
The Department of Justice sponsored a booth at the Muslim Brotherhood front ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) convention underwritten by, among others, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas-linked CAIR.
Obama's Department of Justice sued a New Jersey county, alleging that it refused to accommodate a Muslim employee's khimar, a religious head covering. The suit seeks monetary damages and also seeks to require Essex County to adopt a policy that accommodates the religious observances and practices of employees.
Further, Obama's Department of Justice dropped the "charges" against the Muslims who blew up the USS Cole.
Obama's Department of Justice is still trying to bring the 911 mastermind to New York City for a civilian trial. And these examples are just the tip of the iceberg. The prosecution of Sobolevskiy is by far the worst, and Judge David G. Bernthal, referring to the defendant’s crime as “an act of terror,” is in need of immediate removal. Nuts.
I do not advocate for violence or ugly email missives, but a year in jail for them? This is something altogether different. The Department of Justice is enforcing sharia and abandoning rule of law.
Washington - Maryland Man Sentenced To 1 Year For Sending Threatening Email to Illinois MosqueVosizneias.com (hat tip Nik)
Washington - Ilya Sobolevskiy, a 25-year-old resident of Maryland, was sentenced today to serve 12 months in prison and to pay a $3,000 fine for violating the civil rights of members of an Urbana, Ill., mosque, announced the Justice Department.
During a guilty plea hearing in August 2010, Sobolevskiy admitted that he sent an email to a member of the Central Illinois Mosque and Islamic Center (CIMIC), in which he threatened, among other things, that he would “do WHATEVER it takes to eradicate Islam.” Officials at CIMIC reported the threat to the FBI, which referred the case to the department’s Civil Rights Division.
“One of our most basic rights is the freedom to practice one’s faith in peace,” said Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez of the Civil Rights Division.
I agree. Tell that to the Coptics, Sikhs, Hindus, Jews, Christians, living under Islamic law.
Actually our most basic human right is free speech.
“We have no tolerance for threats of violence fueled by bigotry, and we will aggressively prosecute such actions.”
“It is a top priority of the FBI to protect the civil rights of the American people. We encourage members of the community to report all allegations of civil rights violations. The FBI will aggressively investigate these matters to ensure that our society remains free,” said Stuart R. McArthur, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Springfield Office.
CAIR must be laughing in jihadic glee.
Federal Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal, referring to the defendant’s crime as “an act of terror,” gave the defendant the maximum sentence permitted by law.
This case was investigated by the Springfield, Ill., division of the FBI, and was prosecuted by department Trial Attorney Patricia Sumner.
So I guess I should turn over my hundreds of "hate" emails. Something tells me that those emailers won't be serving time any time soon.
Washington Post has it here.
UPDATE: The last name is Sobolevsky. The offense is "Obstruction Of The Free Exercise Of Religious Beliefs" (U.S.C Sec. 247(a)(2)). The case number is 2:10-cr-20062-DGB.
Not only was Sobolevsky sentenced to a year in prison, but also a year of supervised release.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 08:08 PM in America's New Injustice System, Free Speech Silenced, Freedom on the March Worldwide! | Permalink |Comments (105) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
Friday, November 05, 2010
FORT HOOD JIHAD: ONE YEAR LATER, OBAMA'S COVER UP
Fort Hood Jihad. It's a year since Major Hasan came out as a grand jihadi and slaughtered US soldiers in the largest attack on a military base on American soil in US history.
One year, and the Obama administration is still covering up the motivation behind the attack. Perhaps with the Republican force for good in Washington, we will now be able to sue the White House for information sought in a congressional investigation of last year’s rampage at the Texas military base in which 13 soldiers were killed.
So crippled has our military (and other branches of government) become by this self-imposed sharia (do not insult Islam!), that despite the staggering loss of US soldiers, the chief concern of Army chief Casey in the bloody aftermath of the Fort Hood jihad was that"speculation could potentially heighten backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers and what happened at Fort Hood was a tragedy, but I believe it would be an even greater tragedy if our diversity becomes a casualty here."
That was the concern.
On the day of Major Hasan's mass slaughter of US troops at Fort Hood in the bloodiest act of war on a military base in US history, Major Muslim Hasan distributed Qurans and his card, calling infidels to convert to Islam before his jihad (posted at Atlas November 6, 2009 --Major Hasan's Dawah before Jihad).
Hasan screamed "Allahu Akbar"!!! as he mowed down US soldiers at Fort Hood.
Obama has continued to withhold evidence in the Fort Hood jihadist attack and continues to shield the Muslim terrorist. Senators have been forced to sue the White House for information.
Congressman John Carter back in April:
Yet the Obama Administration continues to deny the Fort Hood attack was terrorism, failed to grant the casualties the same status as that given casualties from the 2001 Pentagon attack, conspicuously omitted even mention of the words “radical Islamic terrorism” in the official DOD report on the shootings, and will not acknowledge the role of political-correctness in stifling whistleblower warnings of the impending attack.
Now the Administration is refusing to fully comply with a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee subpoena that the Pentagon share documents and witnesses concerning the incident.
Senate Homeland Security Chairman Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Ranking Minority Member Susan Collins (R-MA) issued the subpoena after the Administration refused to provide those documents on the request of the committee.
The Administration bases their denial on the argument that releasing the information might endanger their prosecution of Major Nidal Hasan.
As a state judge who presided over murder trials for 20 years before coming to Congress, that’s ludicrous. Any prosecutor who can’t win a conviction against Hasan with literally dozens of eyewitnesses doesn’t need to be a prosecutor.
House and Senate members are not convinced that the Pentagon is taking the necessary steps to provide maximum deterrance to similar attacks in the future, or to respond to the aftermath of this attack. This is why subpoenas have been issued, and why I have introduced legislation to remedy these shortcomings.
As to the specific bills I introduced this year dealing with the Fort Hood attack, no floor or committee action has yet been taken, but the text of the bills are under consideration for inclusion in this year’s Defense Authorization Act.
Today Congressman Carter issued this:
(FORT HOOD, TEXAS) – America should pause to remember those killed and wounded one year ago in the terror attack on Fort Hood, and recognize that sacrifice with a renewed commitment to assist and honor the casualties and their families, and to prevent similar future attacks, according to Congressman John Carter, who represents the Fort Hood area in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Carter, who is also Co-Chairman of the House Army Caucus and Secretary of the House Republican Conference, says the ongoing trial of Major Nidal Hasan for the Fort Hood shootings one year ago is just one of many issues still not resolved. The victims have still not received the treatment and status they deserve, the military has not acknowledged the nature and causes of the attack, and there is numerous security improvements still needed to prevent future attacks.
Carter says radical Islamic terrorism has still not been acknowledged as the cause of the Fort Hood shootings which left 14 Americans dead, and the Department of Defense must not allow political correctness to continue to skew its policies on force protection.
“It has been a year since the terror attack on Fort Hood, and DOD still refuses to even use the words ‘radical Islam’ in their report on the attack or recommendations on how to prevent future attacks,” says Carter. “That does not instill confidence in Congress that DOD is taking the necessary steps to protect our troops.”
Carter, a former Texas judge, has introduced legislation authorizing the same status for Fort Hood victims as that awarded casualties of the 9-11 attack on the Pentagon, and granting whistleblower protections to military and civilian personnel who report potential threats from radical Islamic sympathizers.
“The families of the 13 adults and one unborn child who died, along with the wounded, deserve the same treatment as we provided the Pentagon casualties,” says Carter. “Congress must not rest until these families receive what they deserve.”
Carter also introduced legislation providing “active shooter” training for all military and civilian law enforcement protecting military installations. Fort Hood officers credit the training with their success in stopping the Fort Hood shooter in an open gunfight.
Carter succeeded in passing a resolution in the House and Senate recognizing the good response of Fort Hood law enforcement and base command in responding to the attack. The rest of the Carter bills await passage as part of the pending National Defense Authorization Act.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, November 05, 2010 at 03:21 PM in Fort Hood Jihad | Permalink | Comments (0) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
STATISTICAL ISLAM, PART 3 OF 9
Islamic scholar William Warner, whose work I have long admired, has devoted recent study to statistical Islam. I was fortunate to spend the day with Mr. Warner when he came to see me speak in Tennessee. His work is seminal. I ran part I here.........Here is part II of IX.
Statistical Islam, Part 3 of 9
Case 2: The Kafir
There is a second division that overwhelms the reader of the historical Koran. A majority of the text concerns the Kafir (unbeliever). It is not about being a Muslim, but about the Kafir. A note: most Koran translations use the word "unbeliever" instead of Kafir, but Kafir is the actual Arabic word.
This term is so important and so unknown that the meaning of Kafir must be defined. The original meaning of the word is one who covers or conceals the known truth. A Kafir knows that the Koran is true, but denies it. The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as "unbeliever" but this translation is wrong. The word "unbeliever" is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.
There are many religious names for Kafirs: polytheists, idolaters, People of the Book (Christians and Jews), atheists, agnostics, and pagans. Kafir covers them all, because no matter what the religious name is, they can all be treated the same. What Mohammed said and did to polytheists can be done to any other category of Kafir.
Islam devotes a great amount of energy to the Kafir. Not only is the majority (64%) of the Koran devoted to the Kafir, but also nearly all of the Sira (81%) deals with Mohammed's struggle with them. The Hadith (Traditions) devotes 32% of the text to Kafirs.
For the statistics go to: http://cspipublishing.com/statistical/index.html
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, November 05, 2010 at 01:46 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD CONNECTIONS TO GLOBAL ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST ORGANISATIONS
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, November 05, 2010 at 12:28 PM in CAIR: JIHAD IN AMERICA 2010 | Permalink | Comments (2) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
RUSSIA: MUSLIMS SET THREE CHURCHES ABLAZE
How many stories do we have to run? It's the jihad. Period
"It was a well-orchestrated provocation, but we can not talk about inter-religious enmity, especially between Orthodox Christians and Muslims." Meanwhile, an imam has been killed as well, so it looks as if this "inter-religious enmity" is upon them regardless of their wishes. And while Feofan's sentiment, "We can not blame Muslims, we can not judge people by individual incidents," is a common one, it is a bit out of focus, just as it is when the Islamic supremacist proponents of the Ground Zero mosque hotly insist that Muslims as a whole cannot and must not be made to bear "collective responsibility" for the 9/11 jihad attacks. In reality, no one with any sense is blaming all Muslims for anything that any individual Muslim has done; the problem lies in the Islamic texts and teachings that are used to justify such acts of violence. There is ample justification in the Qur'an, which calls upon Muslims to fight Christians until they "feel themselves subdued" (9:29), and the Sunnah, in which Muhammad tells his followers to offer non-Muslims conversion or subjugation, and to go to war with them if they refuse both, for attacks such as this one. Muslims who oppose such attacks need ultimately to confront the existence of these Islamic teachings and work honestly to blunt their force, but non-Muslims need immediately to recognize that this is not being done within the Muslim community now, and to make a realistic appraisal accordingly, and take what steps must be taken to defend themselves and their way of life.
"Attack on Christians in Russian Caucasus," by Nina Achmatova for Asia News, November 3 (thanks to C. Cantoni):
Moscow (AsiaNews) - The North Caucasus is till burning and this time the target of violence are religious. Attacks on Christian churches and against Muslim leaders have taken place between 1 and 2 November in different parts of the region.Local Christian leaders have been trying now not to foment tension and avoid pointing the finger at religious extremism, but the eyes of investigators and public opinion are all pointing in that direction.
At dawn on Nov. 1, three fires have occurred in as many churches in the Autonomous Republic of Karachayevo-Cherkessia. According to preliminary reports, the attackers set fire to an Orthodox church in Orjonikidzevsky, almost destroyed, then continued on to another Orthodox and a Baptist church. In all cases, the buildings wee [sic] saved by the immediate intervention of pastors and faithful, who, after calling the fire department, started to put out the flames on their own....
Christian leaders have taken steps to curb possible tensions with the Muslim community. Press and investigators immediately indicated the track of religious extremism, which infests the Russian Caucasus. According to statements by the Archbishop of Stavropol and Vladikavkaz, Feofan, there are no preconditions for talking about religious hatred in the region: "It was a well-orchestrated provocation, but we can not talk about inter-religious enmity, especially between Orthodox Christians and Muslims." "We can not blame Muslims, we can not judge people by individual incidents. Even policemen and muftis are killed and the attack has the same matrix: the intention is to destabilize inter-religious harmony, but they will not succeed", added the Orthodox bishop.
Almost to prove his words, news of the assassination of the imam of a mosque in Khasavyurt, in the Republic of Dagestan, with a gunshot to the head, authorities are investigating.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, November 05, 2010 at 11:57 AM in Russia: Still the Evil (ex)Empire | Permalink | Comments (0) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
LEFTIST FORMER SUPREME COURT JUSTICE STEVENS SHOWS INTOLERANCE TOWARDS THE VICTIMS OF THE GROUND ZERO MEGA MOSQUE, CORDOBA HOUSE
The cable news network New York 1 asked me, "Any response from your organization regarding Justice Stevens Pak51 comments today?"
Here is what I said in response to Stevens' intellectually dishonest remarks:
Justice Stevens is wrongly re-framing the narrative. It's is not a religious liberty issue. It is a matter of common decency and human compassion. The Islamic supremacists intent on building the Ground Zero mega mosque are radically intolerant of the pain and grief they are causing. Imam Rauf and El Gamal need sensitivity training.
Building a mega mosque on the site of a building destroyed in the 911 attacks is a stab in the eye and in the heart.
Further, I am shocked at Justice Stevens admission of racism:"Among the thoughts that he said flashed through his [Stevens] mind during a 1994 visit to the memorial to the Japanese attack that brought the U.S. into World War II was, “These people don’t really belong here.”
A full fifty years later he is repelled by the idea of Japanese visitors to Pearl Harbor? Astounding.
I am not. Nor have I ever had such thoughts. We fought that war. The Japanese surrendered. They never rubbed Pearl Harbor in our faces. The Japanese never asked to build a Shinto shrine at Pearl Harbor. They could. They have the legal right. But they didn't and they wouldn't because it would be wrong.
The Pope withdrew the plan to build a church at Auschwitz because of the pain and the suffering it was causing. He did not have to. There was no law that said he should. He did it because it was the right thing to do.
The Cordoba House is wrong. There are hundreds of mosques in New York City, thousands of mosques in America. This is not about that. Why there? Where is the mutual respect? Mutual understanding? Reciprocity?
Americans have every right to grieve and hold that hallowed ground sacred. Stop attacking the victims.
If you missed what Justice Stevens said, read on.........
Former Supreme calls for greater tolerance of Park51
… The 90-year-old Stevens said it is wrong to lump all Muslims with the terrorists who carried out the Sept. 11 attacks that killed 3,000 people. “Guilt by association is unfair,” he told a Japanese-American group in Washington.
It is not guilt by association. Thousands are dying in Islam's war on the West in America, Europe, the Middle East, Russia, China, etc. They are inspired by the same playbook -- the Qur'an. What is being done to expunge the qur'an of the ideology that inpires jihad?
The center’s location two blocks north of where the Twin Towers once stood has upset some relatives of Sept. 11 victims and stirred nationwide debate and angry demands that it be moved. Critics say the site of mass murder by Islamic extremists is no place for an Islamic institution, while supporters of the center say religious freedom should be protected.
But Stevens, a World War II veteran, compared the criticism of the mosque to the emotion he said he initially felt when he saw Japanese tourists at Pearl Harbor.
Among the thoughts that he said flashed through his mind during a 1994 visit to the memorial to the Japanese attack that brought the U.S. into World War II was, “These people don’t really belong here.”
Stevens sounds like the racist.
He said many New Yorkers might have had a similar reaction to news about the mosque in lower Manhattan.
Not true. Not similiar at all.
But Stevens said he realized he was drawing conclusions about a group of people that did not necessarily fit any one of the tourists he saw at Pearl Harbor.
“We should never pass judgment on barrels and barrels of apples just because one of them may be rotten,” said Stevens, who left the court in June. He commented on an issue of public debate in a way he most likely would have avoided had he still been serving as a justice.
The Japanese were defeated. Jihad is still waging war on us.
He said that a nation built by people who fled religious persecution “should understand why American Muslims should enjoy the freedom to build their places of worship wherever permitted by local zoning laws.”
They can build anywhere they want (unlike non-Muslims in Muslim lands). This is not a religious liberty issue. It's indecent.
Stevens said the National Japanese American Memorial in Washington offers a similar message in its recognition that the internment of thousands of U.S. citizens of Japanese descent during World War II was wrong.
All is fair in love and war.
He called the monument a “a powerful reminder of the fact that ignorance — that is to say, fear of the unknown — is the source of most invidious prejudice.”
Well, what did you expect from a liberal? They love ideas, hate people.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, November 05, 2010 at 01:27 AM in Ground Zero Mega Mosque: Takbir! | Permalink | Comments (6) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
Thursday, November 04, 2010
VICTORY SESSION -- GELLER, SPENCER NOVEMBER 12TH IN FORT WORTH, TEXAS
Now what? Join Robert Spencer and me in Texas on November 12th for the next phase in defeating the enemy in the war on America.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 10:20 PM in Atlas events | Permalink | Comments (0) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
RIGHTEOUS!
Watch the Iranian pig on the left. He refuses to shake the Israeli's hand.
Love that the Israeli champion took first first place. Watch the Iranian's head and face when the Israeli flag is raised above the Iranian flag and the Israeli national anthem is played... deeeeelish. The hatred of the good for being the good.
Sergio Britva in World Masters Weightlifting Poland 2010 Medal Ceremony cat. 105, men's 35-39
I, too, cannot hear Hatikvah without being brought to tears.
I love the winner. Baruch Hashem! vid hat tip Stuart
UPDATE: Check this out (hat tip Armaros)
Mir Rasool Raisi, Head of Delegation to Iran’s Weightlifting Team, and Hossein Khodadadi, a veteran weightlifting champion, have been banned from all sport activities for life. Mr. Khodadadi appeared on the platform beside an Israeli weight champion during the Poland competitions.
Jalal Yahya-Zadeh, head of Physical Education Committee for Youth Committee announced this news and and added: “The fact that an Iranian weightlifting veteran has competed against an Israeli during the worldwide competitions and has stood beside him during the distribution of medal is unjustifiable.”
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 09:20 PM in Islamic Jew hatred, Israel, the struggle for Good vs Evil | Permalink | Comments (28) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
ISLAMIC BOMB 17 MINUTES AWAY FROM DETONATING
Twenty-six other bombs are out there ........ the sophistication of the bombs set to go off has not been reported. Here's an update toTerror Friday: Jihad Attack Dry Run: Target America
Explosives Found on Inbound US Plane
The bombs hidden in the cartridges of computer printers were wired to cell phones. The sim cards had been removed and the phones could not receive calls, meaning the attackers intended the phones in-built alarms... (ABC News)
PETN, the explosive the Islamic supremacists used in their bombs, is undetectable:
French Minister Says Yemen Bomb Detected 17 Minutes Before Exploding VOA
A French official says one of two mail bombs sent from Yemen last week to addresses in the United States was defused just 17 minutes before it was set to explode.
Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux, speaking Thursday on French television, provided no further details, nor did he say where he got the information about the timing.
But investigators who pulled Chicago-bound packages off cargo planes in Britain and the United Arab Emirates on Friday found bombs that were wired to cell phones, with the communication cards removed.
Separately Thursday, police in the Greek capital conducted a controlled explosion of a parcel bomb addressed to the French embassy. No injuries were reported.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 01:54 PM in Global Jihad 2010, World War IV | Permalink | Comments (7) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
SEE BS
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 12:58 PM | Permalink | Comments (5) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
STOP MUSLIM PERSECUTION AND WHOLESALE SLAUGHTER OF CHRISTIANS IN IRAQ
On October 21, Muslims seized a church in Iraq, and kidnapped and slaughtered scores of righteous souls. We are witnessing the same annihilation of Coptic Christians in Egypt by Muslims as well.
Amir wrote me,
Pamela, Take a look at what the Muslims doing to the Christian in Iraq everyday. Over 80 people were beheaded in a single day during a Sunday mass. The youngest one were a 4 months old baby that was beheaded front of her parents and throw the head at her mom. Can you please please please help us? We need a strong voice like yours. God bless.
I urge Canadian Atlas readers to march against Islamic supremacism and murder of non-Muslims. Stand up and fight back.
Christians to hold peaceful demonstration in Toronto against persecution of Christians in IraqPlease join this peaceful Christian demonstration in Downtown Toronto on this Saturday.November 6th, 2010 at 1:00pmWhere: meeting place….. - Corner of Yonge & FrontDirections: From Yonge |Street and Front TO House of Parliament-City HallCanada Condemns Attack in Baghdad Church(No. 349 - November 1, 2010 - 4:15 p.m. ET)The Honourable Lawrence Cannon, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today issued the following statement condemning the October 31 terrorist attack in Baghdad:“Canada condemns Sunday’s terrorist attack on worshippers at Baghdad’s Church of Our Lady of Salvation. On behalf of all Canadians, I offer my deepest sympathy to the families and friends of those killed, and wish a full and rapid recovery to the injured.
“We condemn in the strongest terms those who would conduct such a cowardly, vicious and senseless attack on innocent civilians in a place of worship”
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 12:54 PM | Permalink | Comments (48) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
ST. LOUIS MUSLIM CAB DRIVER ACCUSED OF FUNNELING MONEY TO ISLAMIC TERRORIST ORGANIZATION UPDATE: SAN DIEGO RELIGIOUS LEADER AMONG THOSE CHARGED WITH AIDING MUSLIM TERRORISTS
UPDATE: San Diego religious leader among those charged with aiding Somali terrorists - SignOnSanDiego.com (hat tip Mike)
SAN DIEGO — The arrest of the leader of a City Heights mosque, a man described as a revered figure who was known for advocating nonviolence and tolerance, has stunned the close-knit Somali community in City Heights, where many refugees of the war-torn country live, work and pray.
Mohamed Mohamed Mohamud, 38, appeared in federal court Wednesday to answer to charges that he was involved in a conspiracy to provide money and other aid to al-Shabaab in Somalia, which U.S. authorities have designated a foreign terrorist organization.
Mohamud and co-defendant Issa Doreh, 54, pleaded not guilty. A third defendant, Basaaly Saeed Moalin, 33, pleaded not guilty to similar charges Tuesday.
Mohamud has been the imam — the religious leader — of Masjid Al-Ansar on Winona Avenue for 10 years, said Bashir Hassan, secretary of the small mosque that primarily serves Somali refugees. Doreh and Moalin both attended the mosque, Hassan said.
Mohamud is married and has several children, Hassan said Wednesday.
“He is the center of the community here,” Hassan said. “Everyone likes him. When anyone needs help, he is the first person to help. His arrest was very shocking. He is a godfather person to the community.”
One man's terror funding is another Muslim's zakat.
St. Louis Man Accused Of Funneling Money To Somali Terrorist Organization (KTVI-FOX2Now.com) —A St. Louis cab driver is accused of supporting an overseas terrorist group. the Somali refugee was arrested Monday after a two year federal investigation. Federal investigators tracked the money trail that originated in St. Louis to Somalia. Authorities say Mohamud Yusuf sent five thousand dollars to a known terror group in his homeland.
Five grand may not seem like a lot unless you live in an African country in the middle of a violent civil war.30 year old Mohamud Yusuf is accused of gathering and helping transfer money to a terror group called al-Shabab.
U.S. Attorney Richard Callahan said, "al-Shabaab was put on the Attorney General terror list in february of 2008. it is largely a somali organization involved in a civil war with the federal government."
Callahan says Yusuf sent money to al-Shabaab for more than a year beginning in February 2008.
"Our indictment only covers about $5,000 and while that doesn't go far in the U.S. it would go very far in Somalia," said Callahan.
Callahan say Yusuf sent the money overseas in small increments. al-Shabaab has ties to Al-Qaida.
"That's the greatest evil of this financial support being sent back to Somalia to aid in a overthrowing the government, a government that is being supported by the United States," said Callahan.
Callahan say Yusuf didn't act alone.
While one co-conspirator is still at large, another Somali refugee who owned a wire transfer business was arrested in Minnesota this week.
"Abi Hussein from Minneapolis is also charged with helping them funnel the money under fictitious names," said Callahan.
Mohamud Yusuf worked as an airport cab driver. He's been in St. Louis for at least six years and has had at least one previous run in with the law.
'We know he was charged in November of 2008 with falsifying naturalization papers," said Callahan.
He has a detention hearing scheduled in federal court on Thursday afternoon.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 12:29 PM in FINANCIAL JIHAD: Funding Islamic Terror | Permalink | Comments (5) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
AIN'T LOVE GRAND?
The sharia (Islamic law.) This is what Hamas-linked, Islamic supremacist CAIR is suing Oklahoma for. Lock up your daughters and your toddlers!
80-year-old man marries 14-year-old hat tip PV
A Saudi old man aged above 80 years has married a 14-year-old girl and is refusing to divorce her unless she pays him back his wedding money, the Saudi Ajel Arabic language online paper reported on Wednesday.
The bride’s father, Showan Ateen, said his daughter had been forced to marry that man from the southwestern town of Sabya but that she has not moved in with him yet. He did not say who forced her to marry him.
“The father and the bride now want a divorce but the husband is refusing to divorce her before they pay him back his SR-17,000 dowry,” Ajel said.
“Her father said he does not have the money and is appealing for all benevolent people to help him so he will regain his daughter…the old man has threatened that they either pay him or he will take her by force.”
The report comes amidst furor in the Gulf Kingdom over widespread teen age marriage and calls for enacting laws to curb such practices.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 12:00 PM | Permalink | Comments (8) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
Just as the Ground Zero mosque revealed the true face of Islamic Supremacists to the American people and unmosqued their real goals, so too will the lawsuit being brought by the Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood front CAIR against the good people of Oklahoma.
By their fruits we shall know them, and so once again, we know Islamic supremacist CAIR.
Who is funding this lawsuit? We are talking millions here. Who is funding our destruction from within? While the slaves at Politico et al are feverishly tracking down my $18, $25 donations, they remain silent, complicit in the massive subversive funding of the supremacist groups whose stated goal is "eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within." These lawsuits are a bloody fortune. The ten million dollar lawsuit filed against me by Rifqa Bary's parents lawyers has already racked up $25,000, and it has only just begun. Thanks to David Yerushalmi and Robert Muise of the Thomas Moore Law Center for their hard work and diligence in this frivolous but dangerous lawsuit to silence anyone who speaks against Islam. That too is the sharia.
Hamas-linked Muslim Brotherhood CAIR is suing Ohio to install the sharia. Why isn't CAIR fighting against the jihadists with such hate and determination? Why aren't they fighting the devout violent Muslims with such venom?
We have seen sharia law in New Jersey. Back in July, a Muslim husband raped his wife and the judge saw no sexual assault because Islam forbids wives to refuse sex. Luckily, the appellate court overturned this decision, and a Sharia ruling by an American court has not been allowed to stand. This time. (More on that here and here.)
Imposing mandatory prayer times in union contracts on non-Muslim workers is the sharia. It must be stopped. Drip drip drip...... Sharia deceptions.
There is no place for the sharia in America. This case must be fought by the best Western minds, and won, and used as the template for all 50 states.
And Hamas-linked CAIR makes a stunning admission in its press release. Hamas-linked CAIR admits that the brutal, oppressive and radical sharia is Islam. Why call the amendment "anti-Islam"? It is anti-sharia.
CAIR to Announce Suit Challenging Oklahoma Anti-Islam Amendment PR Newswire
OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla., Nov. 3, 2010 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On Thursday, November 4, the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-OK) will hold a news conference with religious and civil rights leaders in the State Capitol Building to announce the filing of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of an anti-Islam ballot measure (State Question 755) passed in yesterday's election. The measure amends the state constitution to forbid judges from considering Islamic law or international law when making a ruling.
WHAT: CAIR-OK News Conference to Announce Legal Challenge to Anti-Islam Ballot Measure
WHEN: Thursday November 4, 2010, 2 p.m.
WHERE: State Capitol Building, 2nd Floor in the Press Room
CONTACT: CAIR-Oklahoma Executive Director Muneer Awad, 405-248-5853, E-Mail: mawad@cair.com
Law Professor: Ban on Sharia Law 'a Mess' (CNN)
And of course an unhealthy dose of the subversive propaganda that the left is only too willing to provide from the Puff Ho and the Beast.
America's Sharia Hysteria (Daily Beast)
What Is Shariah and Why Does It Matter? (Huffington Post)
Speakers at the news conference will include:
* Muneer Awad -- Executive Director, CAIR-OK
* Chuck Thornton -- Deputy Director, ACLU-Oklahoma
* Imad Enchassi -- Imam, Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City (ISGOC)
* Nathaniel Batchelder -- Director, Central Oklahoma Human Rights Association (COHRA)
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 11:46 AM in CAIR: JIHAD IN AMERICA 2010, Creeping Sharia: American Dhimmitude | Permalink | Comments (20)ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
NOW WHAT?
The source of the government’s authority is “the consent of the governed.” This means that the government is not the ruler, but the servant or agent of the citizens; it means that the government as such has no rights except the rights delegated to it by the citizens for a specific purpose.Ayn Rand, “The Nature of Government,” The Virtue of Selfishness, 110.
The Republican win on Tuesday was far larger than the historic takeback in the stunning rebuke of then-President Clinton in 1994 that subsequently forced a chastised Clinton to enact welfare reform (pig flying moment). On tsunami Tuesday, the Republicans won more seats in the House than at any time since 1948 – 65 seats, the biggest swing by either party in the 62 years since then, and another six seats in the Senate. We changed the world at the state level, completely flipping 18 state legislatures, including North Carolina, which hasn't seen a Republican majority since 1870. The Republicans gained over 500 legislative seats. Republicans picked up at least 10 governorships, giving them more than 30. Think about that.
Even the sparse wins the subversive left managed to pull out on Tuesday were riddled with chicanery, cheating, union payoffs, and the buying of votes with "free lunches." Reid's systemic corruption garnered a win funded by millions of dollars from public-sector unions. It was all in the ground game. Same for California -- a state from which decent, hardworking Americans (aka Republicans) have been fleeing, a state destroyed by union chokehold.
Given that a couple of million Californians have left the state in the past 20 years, most of them Republicans, it’s surprising that Democrats didn’t do better. [....]If 2 million Republicans still were in the state, instead of elsewhere, the Republicans would be triumphing here much as they are throughout the country. Brown’s victory will continue to drive mostly Republicans from the state. Perhaps Meg Whitman would have, too, if she had become governor. The state’s anti-business climate is just too severe for serious jobs creation — except in a few industries in the high-tech sector, such as Silicon Valley (although Apple just located its new server farm in North Carolina); or in the “clean” industries favored by [the left anti-capitalists] AB32 and other environmental laws and regulations. (Cal Watchdog -- Departed Californians Swing Election)
The stakes could not have been higher or more serious in the triumph of the rational on Tuesday. But despite the voter fraud, the SEIU/ACORN thugocracy, and the illegimate tactics, the people spoke, and the people won. Now what? We are done with big government. We are done with recklessly stealing huge private sector wealth. We are done being taxed half to death, our future leveraged and our competitive edge destroyed.
There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide. “Foreign Policy Drains U.S. of Main Weapon,” Ayn Rand, Los Angeles Times, Sept. 9, 1962, G2
Higher taxes imposed on the rich (and the semi-rich) come out of their investment capital (i.e., their savings). These taxes mean less investment, i.e., less production, fewer jobs, higher prices, etc. By the time the "rich" lower their standard of living, those who work in their companies or subcontract with them will be gone, along with their savings and their spouses' jobs — and no power in the world (no economicpower) will be able to revive the dead industries (there will be no such power left). This is paraphrasing Rand decades ago, in “The Inverted Moral Priorities."
We are done with lies. We are done with "it's Bush's fault." We are done with "Obama inherited the second Great Depression." No. Obama's policies led to a great coming depression. Obama talks about Bush spending? The utter gall. Bush was Jack Benny to Obama's prolifigate mack daddy warbucks. The left can spin it any way they like -- the economic emergency of 2008 was a direct result of Democrat entitlement/financial policy: Carter's Community Investment Act (CIA), Clinton's sub-prime push and the ensuing Barney Frank Freddie Mac/Fanny Mae plunder. I do not fault Bush war expenditures. We are at war with a ruthless, bloodthirsty savage ideology that has no humanity. No expense can be spared in defeating jihad. Obama's sniveling like a little girl falls on deaf ears when you consider the trillions he stole from us for no reason but to pad the pockets of his shadow government.
Obama still doesn't get it. Obama's tone at his press conference on Wednesday was still contemptuous of the American people and shocking in terms of simple math. He had the audacity to say this:
We should be able to agree now that it makes no sense for China to have better rail systems than us, and Singapore having better airports than us,” he said.
“And we just learned that China now has the fastest supercomputer on Earth. That used to be us. They’re making investments, because they know those investments will pay off over the long term,” he added.
Singapore and China are free market economies -- laissez faire capitalism (though China is politically repressed, which is why they will ultimately fail). So here we have Obama whining about more successful countries, successful because of capitalism, while driving America to the failed European model of socialism, marxism, and serfdom.
Obama's big government America quickly deteriorates the conditions in which free men produce, invent, and prosper, because of government taxation and regulation. The price of force. Big government has been encroaching on our lives for decades now, and with Obama, the bottom falls out.
The changes are imperceptible on a daily basis, but for those of us who are over forty, it is not hard to recall the differences. Particularly the small differences. Eastern Airlines (long defunct) was the most familiar carrier New York to Florida -- and it was an experience. To the privileged came the champagne and the ice cream sundae cart. That lovely little cart would make its way down the aisle, and you'd choose from the sprinkles or the whipped cream or the hot sauce atop your fave flav. Silly, I know, but like most things, this lagniappe went the way of the horse and buggy, as did the hot meals. And how could it not? The government taxed everything from soup to nuts. From the fuel surcharges to security fees, it always comes out of the consumer. Air travel went from being an experience to dreaded harassment and flying in a packed sardine can.
The Concorde was going to be the future of air travel, in which we'd bop from place to place in half the time. Now the Concorde is defunct. Kaput. Much like the environment for producers and businessmen, who are the "villains" of Democrats, statists, collectivists, moochers and looters.
Everything is worse, less, and more expensive. When you went on vacation, the valet took your car. Now it's $19.95 to park your rental car at the hotel. Are these industries gouging the customer? No. They are trying to stay in business.
This is the price of force. This is the price of coercion. This is the price of statism. This is the price of big government. The very idea of America has been subsumed by an enslavement mentality.
Every dollar the government robs from business, from the individual people, is a dollar that won't be invested in the private sector. Weath won't be created, jobs won't be created, entrepreneurs and businessmen will be deprived of capital, etc. The United States was founded on the principle of individual rights -- government was designed to be small. The objective of the government was defense -- protection of indiviudal rights.
The essential characteristic of socialism is the denial of individual property rights; under socialism, the right to property (which is the right of use and disposal) is vested in “society as a whole,” i.e., in the collective, with production and distribution controlled by the state, i.e., by the government.
Socialism may be established by force, as in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics—or by vote, as in Nazi (National Socialist) Germany. The degree of socialization may be total, as in Russia—or partial, as in England. Theoretically, the differences are superficial; practically, they are only a matter of time. The basic principle, in all cases, is the same.
The alleged goals of socialism were: the abolition of poverty, the achievement of general prosperity, progress, peace and human brotherhood. The results have been a terrifying failure—terrifying, that is, if one’s motive is men’s welfare.
Instead of prosperity, socialism has brought economic paralysis and/or collapse to every country that tried it. The degree of socialization has been the degree of disaster. The consequences have varied accordingly.
“The Monument Builders,” The Virtue of Selfishness,
There is no difference between the principles, policies and practical results of socialism—and those of any historical or prehistorical tyranny. Socialism is merely democratic absolute monarchy—that is, a system of absolutism without a fixed head, open to seizure of power by all corners, by any ruthless climber, opportunist, adventurer, demagogue or thug.
When you consider socialism, do not fool yourself about its nature. Remember that there is no such dichotomy as “human rights” versus “property rights.” No human rights can exist without property rights. Since material goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are needed to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of his effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to turn men into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the “right” to “redistribute” the wealth produced by others is claiming the “right” to treat human beings as chattel.
“The Monument Builders,” The Virtue of Selfishness, 91
What has the government done with the untold wealth they looted from the American people other than sucking much needed capital out of our free society to pay off their thugs, crooks, and corrupt organizations, and get-out-the-vote community organizations?
Government is not the answer -- it destroys everything it touches. We must take back the culture, becuase politics is merely a reflection of the culture. The left has the culture in a chokehold. They demonize the successful and hardworking and exalt failures, moochers and looters -- an inverted moral priority.
Our victory is the beginning of the 40 years war -- who is with me?
We will repeal national socialist Obamacare.
We will destroy all old propaganda media. New media is steamrolling over the deadmen walking.
We will repeal the financial reform bill that scapegoated business for the abject failures of the fed.
We will take back the college campuses.
We will get on our childrens' school boards and, just like in Texas, change the whitewashed history books and review the syllabi.
Get government out of our lives. Dismantle big government. Piece by piece.
Deregulate business. Piece by piece. Sector by sector. Unshackle the motor of the country. Free the producer.
We will volunteer in homeschooling networks. We will donate and offer our services in our respective areas of expertise.
Unshackle America. Repeal "hate crime" legislation. All crime is hate. This is an attack on free speech. Islamic supremacists will invoke "hate speech" to kill free speech.
We will expose and prosecute the subversives like CAIR, ISNA, ICNA, ISNA and all Muslim Brotherhood fronts whose stated aim is "eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within."
We will call our mortal enemy by its rightful name: Islamic jihad.
We will turn the Muslim Brotherhood into the Muslims Little Girlyhood.
We will stop funding Ground Zero Mosque Imam Rauf's fund raising junkets to the Middle East.
We will stop importing whole Muslim communities from Somalia under the "UN's Resettlement Program."
We will ridicule, polarize, and render irrelevant the dogmatic, evil leftists.
We will crush them with our logic and reason and concrete facts.
We will demand reasoned discourse and laugh at their ad hominen attacks.
RINOs will not be tolerated. Leave the party, join the traitors. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, take note.
Drill baby, drill.
We will raise the voting age to 21. Military excluded. If "children" are still on their parents health-care at 26, maybe 21 is too low.
We will mandate trips for key liberals in leadership to Iran, Somalia, Darfur, et al, to watch clitorectomies, stonings, and gender apartheid.
We will arrange for youth summer camps in Somalia and Darfur for Obama's youth corps, and tell them it's the peace corps for the lefties.
We will demand accountability from the United Nations, or withdraw from it.
We will save Israel from Islamic anti-semitism.
We will disqualify the Organization of the Islamic Conference at the UN until there is an Organization of the Christian Conference and Organization of the Jewish Conference.
This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning. -- Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 02:00 AM in CONSERVATIVE COUNTERINSURGENCY/GUERRILLA NEWSFARE, Take Back America! | Permalink | Comments (60) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!
THE GOOD MUSLIM: POLICE EXTRACTS
Back in May, I reported on a little-noted story of a woman who stabbed MP Steven Timms in the UK. Nothing was reported of jihad, her pious devotion to Islam or her religious motivation. Read the transcript: she is yet another among the millions of misunderstanders of Islam.
Read it all.
Roshonara Choudhry: Police interview extracts Guardian
Conducted on 14 May 2010, about four hours after her arrest for stabbing Stephen Timms, in Forest Gate police station
Wednesday 3 November 2010 22.49 GMT
This interview was conducted four hours after Choudhry's arrest for stabbing Stephen Timms. Choudhry was interviewed by Simon Dobinson, a detective sergeant from Newham police, with detective constable Syed Hussain. Choudhry says she was studying English and Communications at King's College London, but dropped out on 27 April 2010, in her third year.
• Simon Dobinson So what made you drop out of that?
• Choudhry 'Cos ... because King's College is involved in things where they work against Muslims.
• Q OK. What sort of things?
• A Last year, or the year before, they gave an award to Shimon Peres [Israeli politician] and they also have a department for tackling radicalisation … So I just didn't wanna go there anymore ... 'cos it would be against my religion.
• Q OK, and when did you sort of make that decision?
• A About a month ago.
• Q OK. It seems quite a long time to be there and almost to the end of that course, you know, the end and just to let it go. Is there any ... did you have any problems understanding the course?
• A I was the top student.
• Q Was you? OK and what did they say when you pulled out?
• A They didn't want me to pull out.
• Choudhry says after leaving her course, she worked at a tuition centre called KnowledgeBox teaching maths, English and science. She says she won't be working there any more.
• Q Why's that then?
• A Because of what I just did today.
• Q Well, tell me about that then. Tell me what happened today.
• A I stabbed Stephen Timms.
• Q You stabbed Stephen Timms.
• A Yep.
• Choudhry gives details of the attack, as heard in her trial. She says she made an appointment to see him at his constituency surgery.
• Q Why did you make that appointment?
• A So I can do what I did.
• Q So tell me what thought process you went through before you made that phone call?
• A I thought that it's not right that he voted for the declaration of war in Iraq.
• Q When did you start thinking about that?
• A Over the last few months.
• Q What's led you to start thinking about that?
• A I've been learning more about Islam.
• Q Where have you been learning that?
• A Internet.
• Q What websites you been looking at?
• A I've been listening to lectures by Anwar al-Awlaki.
• Q Anwar?
• A Al-Awlaki.
• Q Who's he?
• A He's an Islamic scholar. He lives in Yemen.
• Q And where have you been listening to these lectures?
• A I down loaded it off of the internet … Explaining stories from the Qur'an and explaining about jihad.
• Q And has that contributed to your decision to leave King's?
• A Yes.
• Q And where was the link there then?
• A I thought that I should have loyalty to my Muslim brothers and sisters in Palestine and so I should leave King's and that would show my loyalty to them.
• Q Who have you been watching these lectures with?
• A I listen to them on my own.
• Q So when did you decide: 'From what I've learnt, I'm now gonna go and stab Stephen Timms?'
• A A couple of weeks ago. It's three weeks ago, four weeks ago.
• Q So it's quite recent?
• A Yep.
• Q Before you finished college? After?
• A Before.
• Q And that was 27 April, if I remember rightly, was it?
• A Yep.
• Dobinson How do you feel now about what you've done today?
• Choudhry I feel like I did what I'd planned to do.
• Q OK, do you want to tell me more? Tell me what you're thinking now? Tell me what your thoughts about what you've done today are.
• A I feel like I've ruined the rest of my life. I feel like it's worth it because millions of Iraqis are suffering and I should do what I can to help them and not just be inactive and do nothing while they suffer.
• DC Hussain Sorry, just before we finish, I've just a couple of questions that I've got to ask you. When did this interest of yours for Islam develop?
• A I've always been quite religious and I started to listen to Anwar al-Awlaki lectures last year and then I started to get really into it and I listened to everything that … like all of his recorded lectures that he made and that would have been like since November. I've been listening to him since November.
• Hussain How did you get introduced to Anwar al-Awlaki?
• A He's quite famous and I've started to listen to his stuff.
• Hussain How did you come across him?
• A On the internet.
• Hussain Was that from your own research or did someone recommend him?
• A From my own research but everybody listens to him and likes him anyway.
• Q Do you go to a regular mosque?
• A No ... I just pray at home.
• Q Who do you discuss your Islam with?
• A In general I just talk about it to my brothers and sisters but I don't mention everything to them.
• Q If you've got a question that you want to ask or you want answered, who do you ask?
• A I don't ask anyone I just listen to his lectures. There's no one to ask.
• Hussain I just want to go over a little bit how your thought has gone from getting to religion to all of a sudden wanting some form of vengeance.
• A Because as Muslims we're all brothers and sisters and we should all look out for each other and we shouldn't sit back and do nothing while others suffer. We shouldn't allow the people who oppress us to get away with it and to think that they can do whatever they want to us and we're just gonna lie down and take it.
• Q Where did you learn that from?
• A From listening to his lectures.
• Q And that's caused you to do what you've done today?
• A Yeah.
• Q OK. Just a couple of other things. You bought the knives, you say, two to three weeks ago ... Where did you keep 'em?
• A Underneath the bed in a shoebox.
• Q How did you feel about what you was about to do?
• A I was a bit nervous about what I was gonna do but I felt like it had to be done and it's the right thing to do.
• Q Having done it, how do you feel now?
• A I feel like I did my best to fulfil my duty to the other Muslims.
• Dobinson ... What did you think was gonna happen once you'd carried out your intentions?
• Choudhry I thought that I would either get arrested or maybe I would like get killed or something.
• Q How would you get killed?
• A Like, if the police came and they had guns.
• Q [Inaudible] take me through your thought process about that then?
• A Oh no, I was just thinking about the possibilities and I thought it's either getting arrested or being killed. But either way I knew I wasn't coming back home again.
• Q What, what did you think about getting killed then?
• A I wanted to die.
• Q Why?
• A I wanted to be a martyr.
• Q Why's that then?
• A 'Cos, erm, that's the best way to die.
• Q Who told you that?
• A It's an Islamic teaching.
• Q Where did you learn that?
• A It's … it's in the Koran and I learnt it from listening to lectures as well.
• Q OK, what lectures are that?
• A By Anwar al-Awlaki.
• Q al-Awlaki?
• A Yeah.
• Q OK, well, how did you find out about him?
• A On the internet ... if you go on YouTube there's a lot of his videos there and if you do a search they just come up ... I wasn't searching for him, I just came across him ... I used to watch videos that people used to put up about like how they became Muslim.
• Q OK, why did you watch those videos?
• A 'Cos I thought ... their life stories were interesting ... And as you watch videos that like a whole other list of related videos comes up and I was just looking through those and I came across it.
• Q Anwar al-Awlaki?
• A Yeah.
• Q OK. So who put you, who guided down this path to, to look for, you know, the videos of people and how they become Muslim?
• A No one, I just found them really interesting ... I became interested in Anwar al-Awlaki's lectures because he explains things really comprehensively and in an interesting way so I thought I could learn a lot from him and I was also surprised at how little I knew about my religion so that motivated me to learn more...
• Q What happened in November then?
• A I downloaded the full set of Anwar al-Awlaki's lectures.
• Q Yeah, what do you reckon the full set of his lectures are?
• A More than a hundred hours.
• Q And have you watched all those lectures?
• A Yeah.
• Q When did you finish watching them?
• A The first week of May.
• Q How often were you going onto the internet ...
• A First I was listening to like two a day but then for a while I stopped because I had coursework to do and then I started back up again because I thought I need to finish listening to these.
• Q Yeah. Apart from the lectures, what else were you looking at online?
• A I was looking at YouTube videos about the resistance in Afghanistan and Iraq.
• Q What other sites, remember any particular internet sites you looked at?
• A When I was doing research about MPs, I looked at one called theyworkforyou.co.uk [theyworkforyou.com] and I think another one was called publicwhips [the publicwhip.org.uk].
• Q Yeah, anything else?
• A There's a website called revolutionmuslim.
• Q OK. Forgive me, I find it, I just find it a little bit strange that you're doing all this on your own and not speaking to anyone else about or ...
• A Because nobody would understand. And anyway I didn't wanna tell anyone because I know that if anybody else knew, they'd get in trouble 'cos then they would be like implicated in whatever I do, so I kept it a secret.
• Q OK. When did the Iraq war start?
• A 2003.
• Q So how old would you have been then, 14?... did you have any strong view feelings at that time when the war started?
• A No, I was just against in general like everyone else but not strong feelings.
• Q And what changed ... what made you get those strong feelings that you've obviously got now?
• A When I realised that I have an obligation to defend the people of Iraq and to fight on their side, that's when it changed my mind and also just like the death tolls and the civilian, like casualties and the pictures from the prisons.
• Q OK, can you pinpoint the time when that changed or was it a gradual ... was there one particular incident?
• A Like, erm, after like listening to the lectures, I realised by obligation but I didn't wanna like fight myself and just thought other people should fight, like men, but then I found out that even women are supposed to fight as well so I thought I should join in.
• Q Where did you find that out from?
• A A YouTube video by Sheikh Abdullah Azzam.
• Q And what was he saying?
• A He was saying that when a Muslim land is attacked it becomes obligatory on every man, woman and child and even slave to go out and fight and defend the land and the Muslims and if they can't handle like the forces they are facing, then it becomes obligatory on the people who live in ... closest to that country and if those people refuse to fulfil their duty then it, then it becomes to the next closest people and the next closest until it goes all the way round the whole world and it's obligatory on everyone to defend that land.
• Q OK, and when did you watch that YouTube video?
• A That probably would have been a couple of weeks ago like some point in April.
• Q Was that before you bought the knives or after you bought the knives?
• A That would have been before I think ...
• Q ... how soon after watching that video did you decide to put things into action? Or to make plans?
• A It would probably would have been like a few days or something.
• Choudhry says she was planning to leave the UK and live in Bangladesh. But she changed her mind.
• Q Why didn't you go?
• A 'Cos I thought if this is more important then I shouldn't just be running away.
• Q You say 'this is more important'. What is more important?
• A Fighting.
• Q You at some stage since then decided that 'I'm gonna kill Stephen Timms, the local MP'?
• A Yeah
• Q OK, so explain to me again why, why him? Lots of people voted for the war in Iraq, lots of MPs.
• A Yeah, erm, it's because ... well, even the doctor asked me that: so like are you ... were you gonna kill everyone? And I told him that I'm just one person and I did what I could.
• Q I was asking you why Stephen Timms was picked on... Why did you pick an MP to carry out this attack?
• A Because he was directly involved with the declaration of war, so he'd directly committed a crime.
• Q How did you know that?
• A Because years ago back, maybe 2007 or 2006, I went on a school trip to Westminster and to meet him and we sat ... there was a group of us like maybe about 10, and we sat with him for … like an hour maybe and spoke to him and one of my friends there she ... we, we were all just asking general questions about what's it like to be an MP and what kind of work do you do and what are you doing at the moment, just general things like that. But there was this one girl there and almost the whole time we were there, she was having a go at him for ... because he voted for the war in Iraq. She was questioning him about that.
• Q OK, and what did you think about that at the time?
• A At the time I was thinking that she should be quiet and that she's embarrassing herself and I didn't say anything to support her, I just sat there feeling embarrassed.
• Q Embarrassed, what for her or yourself or what, anyone else?
• A I guess I respected her for having the guts to just say all these things to his face but like I wasn't brave enough to say anything, I just sat quietly.
• Q Did you want to say something to him then?
• A Not really.
• Q So, have you carried out any research to ... about Stephen Timms.
• A Yeah, on ... I looked up, I found, I Googled him, I found out he had a website, I found a page about him ontheyworkforyou.com ... if you follow that link it shows information about how he voted on different things related to the Iraq war and the build up towards it. I found out that ... he very strongly agreed with the invasion of Iraq and they said very strongly because they worked out all his votes for everything related to that and it came up to something like 99.9% support or something like that.
• Q How does that make you feel?
• A That made me feel angry because the whole Iraq war is just based on lies and he just voted strongly for everything as though he had no mercy. As though he felt no doubts that what he was doing was right, even though it was such an arrogant thing to do and I just felt like if he could treat the Iraqi people so mercilessly, then why should I show him any mercy?
• Q What, what makes you think that it's your place to go and stab him?
• A Because I'm a Muslim and all Muslims are brothers and sisters. So if he attacked them, then he's likely to attack me too.
• Q So where in the Qur'an does it say that you should go and kill someone?
• A Erm, the main chapters about it are chapter ... chapter eight and chapter nine, I think.
• Q What does that say, can you remember?
• A Erm, it says to ... it says to fight until there is no more oppression in the land. Because it's better to fight than to be persecuted.
• Q What do you think about what you've done to Stephen Timms and all that?
• A I think I've fulfilled my obligation, my Islamic duty to stand up for the people of lraq and to punish someone who wanted to make war with them.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 01:57 AM in The Truth About Islam | Permalink | Comments (9) ShareThis
Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This!