Wednesday, 10 November 2010

STEPHANOMICS AND STIGLITZ

>> WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2010

Stephanie Flanders is pretty excited by the decision by the US 'Fed' decided to pump $600 bn into the US economy.Whilst the rest of the media reported that just about every industrial country in the world was outraged by the US move 'Stephanomics' was as usual behind the curve :

" This week's statement by the Federal Reserve has achieved all that Ben Bernanke might have hoped it would achieve; stocks are up, the dollar is down, and so are US bond yields. We can't say for sure that it will "work", but all of these developments ought to be net positive for the US economy....the US sees competitive depreciation as a win-win for them. If other countries, with flexible countries, don't respond with QE2 of their own, then their currencies will strengthen, and demand for US goods in those economi! es will (theoretically) go up. If they do respond, with more easing to counteract the rise in the currency, then global demand goes up, and the US is once again better off. Put that way, it sounds like a no-brainer'
What is missing is the BBC's usual kneejerk jump to get a comment fromJoseph Stiglitz, Nobel prize winning economist....and supporter of Labour's and the BBC's positon that 'stimulus' works, tax cuts don't. This time Stiglitzwas opposed to the Fed's printing money....saying Fed policies will not reduce long term interest rates and produce loans for SME's and are creating chaos in emerging markets...the money is going to emerging markets which don't want the money...because India and China are doing fine, but the influx of short term money creates a bubble and increases exchange rates, destabilising their economy...The US policy is having an adverse effect around the world.


So no gig for Stiglitz! If you run against their meme, you're history