Tuesday, 14 December 2010

A little old but extremely relevent.

-

From the British House of

Commons...


Andrew Roberts, Member


Parliament


Monday 19


July 2010


I would like to speak to you today as an
historian, because it seems to me that the State of Israel has packed more
history into her 62 years on the planet than many other nations have in six
hundred. There are many surprising things about this tiny, feisty, brave
nation the size of Wales, but the most astonishing is that she has survived at
all. The very day after the UN declared Israel a country in 1948, five Arab
countries attacked, and she has been struggling for her right to life ever
since. And that is what we are here for today, to reiterate Israel's right to
self-defense, inherent in all legitimate countries.

From Morocco to Afghanistan, from the
Caspian Sea to Aden, the 5.25 million square miles of territory belonging to
members of the Arab League is home to over 330 million people, whereas Israel
covers only eight thousand square miles, and is home to seven million
citizens, one-fifth of whom are Arabs. The Jews of the Holy Land are
thus surrounded by hostile states 650 times their size in territory and sixty
times their population, yet their last, best hope of ending two millennia of
international persecution, the State of Israel has somehow survived. When
during the Second World War, the island of Malta came through three terrible
years of bombardment and destruction, it was rightly awarded the George Medal
for bravery; today Israel should be awarded a similar decoration for
defending democracy, tolerance and Western values against a murderous
onslaught that has lasted twenty times as long.

Jerusalem is the site of the Temple of
Solomon
and Herod. The stones of a palace erected by King David himself are

even now being unearthed just outside the walls of Jerusalem. Everything that
makes a nation state legitimate-- bloodshed, soil tilled, two millennia of
continuous residence, international agreements, argues for Israel's right to
exist, yet that is still denied by the Arab League. For many of their
governments, which are rich enough to have economically solved the Palestinian
refugee problem decades ago, it is useful to have Israel as a scapegoat to
divert attention from the tyranny, failure and corruption of their own
regimes.

The tragic truth is that it suits Arab
states very well to have the Palestinians endure permanent refugee status, and
whenever Israel puts forward workable solutions they have been stymied by
those whose interests put the destruction of Israel before the genuine well
being of the Palestinians. Both King Abdullah I of Jordan and Anwar Sadat of
Egypt were assassinated when they attempted to come to some kind of
accommodation with a country that most sane people now accept is not going
away.

"We owe to the Jews," wrote Winston
Churchill in 1920, "a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely
separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious
possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all wisdom and learning put
together. The Jewish contribution to finance, science, the arts, academia,
commerce and industry, literature, philanthropy and politics has been
astonishing relative to their tiny numbers. Although they make up
less than half of one percent of the world population, between 1901 and 1950
Jews won 14% of all the Nobel Prizes awarded for Literature and Science, and
between 1951 and 2000 Jews won 32% of the Nobel Prizes for Medicine, 32% for
Physics, 39% for Economics and 29% for Science. This, despite so many of their
greatest intellects dying in the gas chambers."

Civilization owes Judaism a debt it
can never repay, and support for the right of a Jewish homeland to exist is
the bare minimum we can provide. Yet we tend to treat Israel like a leper on
the international scene, merely for defending herself, and threatening her
with academic boycotts if she builds a separation wall that has so far reduced
suicide bombings by 95% over three years.


It is a disgrace that no senior
member of the Royal Family has ever undertaken an official visit to Israel, as
though the country is still in quarantine after more than six decades. Her
Majesty the Queen has been on the throne for 57 years and in that time has
undertaken 250 official visits to 129 countries, yet has not yet set foot in
Israel. She has visited 14 Arab countries, so it cannot have been that she
wasn't in the region. Although Prince Philip's mother, Princess Alice, is
buried on the Mount of Olives because of her status as Righteous Among
Gentiles, the Foreign Office ordained that his visit to his mother's grave in
1994 had to be in a private capacity only. Royal visits are one of the ways
legitimacy is conferred on nations, and the Coalition Government should end
the Foreign Office's de- facto boycott. After the Holocaust, the Jewish people
recognized that they must have their own state, a homeland where they could
forever be safe from a repetition of such horrors. Putting their trust in
Western Civilization was never again going to be enough. Since then, Israel
has had to fight no fewer than five major wars for her very
existence.

She has been on the front line in the
War against Terror and has been fighting the West's battles for it, decades
before 9/11 or 7/7 ever happened. Radical Islam is never going to accept the
concept of an Israeli State, so the struggle is likely to continue for another
sixty years, but the Jews know that is less dangerous than entrusting their
security to anyone else.

Very often in Britain, especially when
faced with the overwhelmingly anti-Israeli bias that is endemic in our liberal
media and the BBC, we fail to ask ourselves what we would have done placed in
their position? The population of the United Kingdom of 63 million is nine
times that of Israel. In July 2006, to take one example at random, Hezbollah
crossed the border of Lebanon into Israel and killed eight patrolmen and
kidnapped two others, and that summer fired four thousand Katyusha rockets
into Israel which killed a further forty-three civilians.

Now, if we multiply those numbers by
nine to get the British equivalent, just imagine what we would do if a
terrorist organization based as close as Calais were to fire thirty-six
thousand rockets into Sussex and Kent, killing 87 British civilians, after
killing seventy-two British servicemen in an ambush and capturing
eighteen. There is absolutely no lengths to which our Government would
not go to protect British subjects under those circumstances, and quite right
too. Why should Israel be expected to behave any
differently?

In the course of researching my latest
book on the Second World War, I recently visited Auschwitz-Birkenau.
Walking along a line of huts and the railway siding where their forebears had
been worked and starved and beaten and frozen and gassed to death, were a
group of Jewish schoolchildren, one of whom was carrying over his shoulder the
Israeli flag, a blue star of David on white background. It was a
profoundly moving sight, for it was the sovereign independence represented by
that flag which guarantees that the obscenity of genocide which killed six
million people in Auschwitz and camps like it -- will never again befall the
Jewish people, to whom the rest of civilization owes so
much.

I said at the start that I was speaking
to you as an historian, and so I say: No people in History have
needed the right to self-defense and legitimacy more than the Jews of Israel,
and that is what we in the Friends of Israel Initiative demand here
today.