Weekly Commentary: MK Livni fails to connect the dots – her program should reflect expectations
Dr. Aaron Lerner Date: 27 January 2011
MK Tzipi Livni: The idea that some [settlers] will remain by the grace of
the Palestinian state and Palestinian security appears to me to be very
problematic.
Udi Segal: If you think that the Palestinian state that will be established
will murder Israeli citizens who remain there – that we are going to make a
peace arrangement with these murderers? Either there will be peace or there
will be a band of murderers.
Livni: I never sold peace in the sense of “new Middle East”[AL: a phrase
coined by Shimon Peres]. We live in a harsh neighborhood. The “new Middle
East” isn’t going to plop down on us tomorrow and were aren’t going to be
living in different surroundings.”
Interview broadcast 26 January 2011 on Channel 2 evening news program
Kadima leader Tzipi Livni openly proclaims that conditions on the ground
will remain “harsh” even if a sovereign Palestinian state is created as a
result of a negotiated peace agreement that ostensibly puts to rest all
Palestinian demands.
She says it.
But it isn’t reflected in the program she is promoting.
Consider the following:
#1. Is it in any way workable, under “harsh conditions”, to have a patchwork
quilt of various sovereignties and other arrangements in Jerusalem?
#2. Is it in any way workable, under “harsh conditions”, to have a series of
thin indefensible fingers poking into the West Bank to reach settlement
blocs?
#3 Is it in any way reasonable, under “harsh conditions”, to assume that
security arrangements, weapons limitations and a myriad of other
restrictions and provisions detailed in a peace agreement with the
Palestinians would actually be honored by the Palestinians?
And that’s just a sample.
Yes it is extremely frustrating.
But the fact remains.
It doesn’t matter how heavy the hammer.
The round “two sovereign states living side by side in peace” peg can’t fit
the square Middle East “reality” hole.
Nor is the “two state solution” the best option of a collection of bad
alternatives.
Given the “harsh neighborhood”, creating a sovereign Palestinian state would
only serve to exacerbate the situation.
There certainly are candidates for “ best option of a collection of bad
alternatives”, for example enhanced regional autonomy.
Yes, considerable rhetoric has been invested in “two sovereign states living
side by side in peace”.
But repetition doesn’t make a program doomed to catastrophic failure any
less dangerous.
Dr. Aaron Lerner, Director IMRA (Independent Media Review & Analysis)
(Mail POB 982 Kfar Sava)
Tel 972-9-7604719/Fax 972-3-7255730
INTERNET ADDRESS: imra@netvision.net.il
Website: http://www.imra.org.il
Posts
