Paul weston writes an excellent article-
Friday, May 20, 2011
Why Is This Not Treason?
Our English correspondent Paul Weston returns with a spirited broadside
against the treacherous behavior of the Labour government and their
creation of Modern Multicultural Britain.
Why Is This Not Treason?
by Paul Weston
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious.
But it cannot
survive treason from within.
An enemy at the gates is less formidable,
for he is known and carries his banner openly.
But the traitor moves
amongst those within the gate freely,
his sly whispers rustling through
all the alleys,
heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the
traitor appears not a traitor;
he speaks in accents familiar to his
victims, and he wears their face and their arguments,
he appeals to the
baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.
He rots the soul of a
nation,
he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the
pillars of the city,
he infects the body politic so that it can no
longer resist.
A murderer is less to fear.
The traitor is the plague. —
Cicero
On the 3rd of January 1946, William Joyce, better known as Lord
Haw-Haw, was the last man in Britain to be hanged for the ancient crime
of treason. Unless a future government changes the law it is unlikely
that traitors will ever dangle again, after Tony Blair rather
conveniently repealed the death penalty for such a crime in 1998.
That is not to say treason no longer exists. Now the full extent of
Labour’s thirteen-year rule has become apparent, an increasing number
of Britons are volubly accusing the Labour Party of wilfully and
cold-bloodedly betraying Britain and deliberately jeopardising our
children’s future.
Lord Haw-Haw of course sided with the Nazis during the hot war of
1939-1945. The recent Labour government might not have been operating
in a hot-war theatre, but they certainly carried out a warm-war against
the British (principally the English) via mass immigration from one of
the most hostile and anti-Western countries in the world, Pakistan.
Consider some of the following statistics:
Only nineteen percent of Pakistanis have a negative view of Al Qaeda
and by default the Taliban, whilst seventy-five percent wish to see
Sharia law implemented. British-born Muslims make an estimated four
hundred thousand trips a year to Pakistan, where as many as thirty
threats against Britain are being monitored at any given time.
Thirty-three percent of Muslim students in Britain think killing in the
name of Islam is permissible. Only thirty-seven percent oppose the
introduction of Sharia law and only twenty-five percent oppose the
creation of a worldwide Muslim caliphate.
MI5 believe there are up to four thousand potential terrorists and
thirteen thousand Al Qaeda sympathisers living in Britain. The CIA
devotes an astonishing forty percent of their anti-terrorist homeland
security operations against suspects not in Afghanistan or Waziristan,
but in Britain itself — a country described by one CIA operative as “a
swamp of Jihadis.”
Barack Obama’s counter-terrorist advisor Bruce Riedel recently stated:
“The British Pakistani community is recognised as probably Al Qaeda’s
best mechanism for launching an attack against North America.”
All in all then, it would seem less than prudent to allow any more
bearded ideologues into Britain, yet the Labour government — and this
must sound quite insane to most people — actually went to the
extraordinary lengths of advertising for foreign colonisers from the
very same country the Home Office was paying Danegeld to in a typically
limp-wristed appeal to stop it from blowing us up.
The British Embassy in Pakistan distributed glossy pamphlets entitled
“Multicultural Britain — a Land of Immigrants” which gave a raft of
arguments as to the benefits of living in Britain such as well paid
jobs, plain old welfare, and the prospect of inviting over the entire
extended family (sans goat) once a British passport had been acquired.
And of course there was the rather unpleasant — nay, treacherous —
implication that there was no such thing as a homogenous Britain, no
such place as an English homeland, just an indeterminate area of land
settled by a vague mongrel collection of disparate peoples including
any number of rag-tag colonial racists awaiting divine racial
redemption from those they once oppressed.
So desperate were the Labour traitors to destroy Britain that, having
secured power, they immediately carried out two political acts which
could only place our peaceful future in doubt. The Human Rights
Convention was immediately incorporated into British law and
immigration rules were relaxed to allow an open-door policy of mass
Muslim immigration.
A few thousand people who could gently assimilate were of little use to
the Labour government. To ensure the success of their revolutionary
plan, they urgently needed inassimilable millions and were quite
prepared to deceive the British public about the real number of Muslim
immigrants — and the real reasons Tony Blair wanted them in Britain.
And once the floodgates were opened, it became supremely important not
to turn anybody away. Of the 2 million visas issued every year, fifteen
percent of them were “processed” when they should not have been in
order to hit “productivity targets,” with immigration officials placed
under intense political pressure to issue visas rather than reject them.
One man who took advantage of Blair’s treachery was Abu Baseer, the
spiritual advisor to Ansar ul-Islam, a jihadist organisation linked to
Al Qaeda. Baseer was originally based in Iraq prior to settling in West
London, from where he issues various fatwas calling for death to
British soldiers and the overthrow of the West. He had this to say on
the subject of immigration:
“One of the goals of immigration is the revival of the duty of jihad
and enforcement of power over the infidels. Immigration and jihad go
together. One is the consequence of the other and dependent upon it.
The continuance of the one is dependent upon the continuance of the
other.”
The next stage in Labour’s war against Britain and its indigenous
people was to make sure the foreign colonisers maintained their 7th
century ideology and customs through a curious yet highly effective
liberal process called “multiculturalism.” This guaranteed their
non-assimilation and thus provided Tony Blair and his friends with a
hostile and ever-growing tool with which to incrementally erode
traditional Britain.
Despite the obvious violence that emanates from massed Muslims wherever
they are in the world, the Labour government went to great lengths to
portray Islam as The Religion of Peace, even as Christianity was mocked
and defiled, and decent, moral and patriotic Britons were re-cast and
criminalised as Islamophobic, race-hating Nazis.
Not even our children were safe from Tony Blair’s thought police. The
propaganda arms of the BBC and the state educational service tried to
convince our children that their race, culture, religion and history
consisted only of genocide, racism and evil. The spectre of Adolf
Hitler was also constantly invoked with the quite deliberate intention
of linking any resistance to the religious and ethnic colonisation of
Britain with the actions and ideology of the Nazis.
And while third-world immigration continued apace, the Labour Party
lied to cover up the attendant serial catastrophes. We were told that
they were peaceful, that they committed little crime and that they were
a benefit to the economy. None of this was true, as detailed by the
exposure of Labours’ various lies and distortions, which showed a
negative cost to the economy and a disproportionate level of crime
including rape and murder — and of course, terrorism.
Nine out of ten new jobs were taken by immigrants, along with
eighty-five percent of new housing. Muslims are grossly
over-represented within Britain’s jails and within Britain’s welfare
state, which supports fifty percent of Muslim males and seventy-five
percent of females who reproduce like belt-fed mortars rather than
going out to work.
To further bolster the Muslim demographics, Britain’s laws against
polygamy were overlooked in the case of Islam. Muslim males could thus
legally amass four imported wives, twenty to thirty children and a
large house (or houses) in which to raise them, all paid for by the
Labour state — right down to the satellite dish tuned into the various
sources of jihad beamed direct from the East.
Only two out of three babies born in Britain today are classified as
white British. Twenty percent of mothers are first generation
immigrants, and a further twenty-five percent second or third
generation immigrants. The idea that there are only 2.4 million Muslims
in Britain is therefore ridiculous. There is strong evidence to suggest
the numbers could be somewhere between 5-10 million.
The welfare-funded Muslim birth-rate has already rendered English
children a minority in many city schools. In London, white school
children now enter their first year as an ethnic minority. Figures from
the Office of National Statistics suggest that British people of all
ages will become a minority by 2066 with the young becoming a minority
far earlier, and the young English earlier still.
These apocalyptic figures led Professor David Coleman of Oxford
University to state that the transition of white Britons to a minority
was likely to be: “unwelcome… and would represent an enormous change to
national identity — cultural, political, economic and religious”.
Professor Coleman is quite right, but what is scarcely believable is
that these enormous changes were precisely what the Labour Party had in
mind in 1997. This was made apparent when Peter Hitchens recounted his
dismay regarding a fellow hack who jumped ship in order to work for the
Labour Party:
“I asked him why he had done this awful thing. He replied: you have no
idea at all just how enormous the New Labour Project really is.”
Other people were all too aware of the size and direction of the Labour
Party juggernaut, but still managed to hold onto their naiveté as to
its ultimate destination, which appears to be the cultural and racial
eradication of the English people. This genocidal policy was explained
by Tony Blair’s speech-writer Andrew Neather in 2010, when he rather
foolishly came out with the following treasonous nuggets:
‘It didn’t just happen: the deliberate policy of ministers from late
2000 until at least February last year was to open up the UK to mass
migration… to make the UK truly multicultural…the policy was intended
to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of
date… this shone through even in the published report: the “social
outcomes” it talks about are solely those for immigrants’
There were two main reasons for such treachery. The first was held by
Labour’s minority hard-left who wanted to destroy utterly the hated
traditional establishment, and in this respect they had no choice but
to declare war on their own people. To the hard-left, the enemy was the
conservative, Christian, capitalist West of liberal-democracy Western
civilisation — or, in other words, the majority of the English.
The second reason, held perhaps by the majority of Labour apparatchiks,
was to ensure a socialist government in perpetuity via the imported
foreign vote. Research into voting patterns conducted for The Electoral
Commission in May 2005 showed that Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshis
voted 56%, 50% and 41% for Labour. The equivalent figures for the
Conservatives were 11%, 11% and 9%
The Labour Party has form with this kind of gerrymandering.
Ex-Communist Peter Mandelson’s grandfather, Herbert Morrison, who was
Labour’s Deputy Prime Minister between 1945-1951, came up with the
novel idea of constructing soviet-style concrete tower-blocks for the
working-class to live in who would subsequently vote Labour and thus
“build the f*****g Tories (Conservatives) out of London.”
Tony Blair simply took it a stage further, and imported a “vigorously
encouraged to feel oppressed class” from foreign climes to serve as
cultural destroyers / Labour bloc-voters. This is a subtle re-working
of Bertolt Brecht’s comment in the wake of East Berlin’s 1953 bread
riots, when he suggested: “Wouldn’t it be simpler for the government to
dissolve the people and elect another?”
Who would have thought this would one day apply to “democratic” Britain
where the indigenous people are not so much being dissolved as
replaced, and where “population replacement” is simply a more refined
way of saying ethnic cleansing?
It was James Burnham who first coined the phrase “Suicide of the West”,
but this is not a majority-ordained suicide. It is a
minority-controlled murderous genocide. Let me be very clear about
this: Tony Blair and the Labour Party declared war on their own people,
and there is (as yet) no substantive reason to believe we can survive
this century, let alone the long term.
The point of war is not about fighting and shooting and storming and
gung-hoing; it is about gaining physical territory and taking political
control of the defeated territory and its people. This is exactly what
is slowly but surely happening to the English.
And because it is happening so slowly, many people are unaware of the
situation. If a man is injected with a fast acting poison and dies
minutes later, he has clearly been murdered. But is it not still murder
if the poison were slow acting and allowed the man to live another
twenty years?
It is the act of injection, knowing the consequences, which makes it
murder, and Tony Blair injected Britain with a lethal cocktail of
fast-breeding inassimilable aliens in the full and calculated knowledge
that the country and its indigenous people would be incrementally
destroyed as a result.
We can see this destruction today. Vulnerable girls in Northern towns
were groomed and raped by Pakistanis for over eight years without any
recrimination. The police simply pretended nothing untoward was
happening. Much the same happened in Berlin in the mid 1930s to the
Jews, who suffered tremendous persecution that was subsequently ignored
by the authorities.
In London, entire areas are slowly coming under Islamic control. Tower
Hamlets is now lost to the West as Jews, women and homosexuals are
persecuted whilst English street names and the few remaining whites are
systematically replaced. Soon to be lost, if indeed they are not
already lost are Luton, Bradford, Oldham, Birmingham, Leicester, etc.
Fjordman calls this Beheading Nations and asks the following question:
“Less attention has been paid to the fact that Muslims are beheading
entire nation states. Although this is happening in slow motion, it is
no less dramatic. Historically, the major cities have constituted a
country’s ‘head’ the seat of most of its political institutions and the
largest concentration of its cultural brainpower. What happens when
this “head” is cut off from the rest of the body?”
When our racial / religious society cedes territory to a rival society,
then we are losing a battle. When the state enacts laws to reward the
aggressive incomer and to penalise the passive native, then we are
losing a battle. When our children are brainwashed into the belief that
they are evil and worthy only of displacement, then we are losing a
battle. When our women and children are raped and abused whilst the
state remains silent, then we are losing a battle.
And when finally we become too defeated even to breed whilst we pay the
aggressor to demographically swamp us, then we have not just lost a
battle, we are in the midst of losing a war, our homeland, and our
civilisation. We are rapidly on our way to extinction.
We have been betrayed. Tony Blair and the Labour Party have committed
treason. The British people were never asked if they wished Muslim
immigrants to colonise Britain in such large numbers that it
constituted invasion. Had they been asked they would have replied with
a resounding No!
Although lawyers may argue over the precise meaning of the word
“treason”, everyone else understands it only too well, including Tony
Blair, which (along with the EU sell-out) is presumably why he repealed
the treason laws. The Labour government was elected to represent the
best interests of the British people, not those of Mirpur.
It does not really matter whether the third world was imported for
revolutionary or electoral gain. All that matters is that Tony Blair’s
Labour Party systematically allied itself with the massed imported
ideologues of the Western world’s most persistent historical aggressor,
and actively sided against Britain and the British people.
Rather than sign off with a furious tirade about the severe
recrimination traitors should endure, I will leave you instead with a
calm yet deeply poignant quote from Alex Henshaw, chief test-pilot for
Vickers Armstrong during the Second World War. Despite test-flying ten
percent of all Spitfires during their development stage, Mr Henshaw
survived the war and lived a long life before dying in 2007:
“I feel extreme emotional sadness for the young men I knew that gave
their lives willingly for a cause in which we all believed. And I often
say to myself now if those young boys would come down now and walk
through the villages, through the towns and through the cities and look
around and see what is happening to us, they would say somewhere along
the line we have been betrayed.”
Yes, Mr Henshaw. I am afraid you have.
Posts
