Thursday, 19 May 2011

This New "Savings Account" Will Save You from Financial Disaster

By Dan Ferris, editor, The 12% Letter

Thursday, May 19, 2011
"You're crazy to own cash. Don't you know the U.S. dollar is worthless… and headed for
disaster
?"

Three weeks ago, I told folks to hold off buying stocks, bonds, and commodities and
hold cash instead.
I received a lot of angry feedback. It can all be summarized by
the comment above.

The emotional reaction I received from many readers reinforced my preference for
keeping the bulk of my cash in the world's most hated asset right now: U.S. dollars.

But the bigger point is the meaning of "cash" is different to me than to most people.
 And if you start thinking about cash the same way I do, you're going to save yourself
a lot of trouble over the coming years…

You see, the way I use it, a better term for "cash" might be "liquid savings."

And these days, my idea of "liquid savings" is much more important than it was
15 years ago.

My idea of liquid savings is strange to most because I recognize that gold is money
 and, therefore, an appropriate vehicle in which to amass your savings.

Most folks don't own gold and don't understand that it's money. The status quo is
to live beyond one's means, buy investment manias at the top and sell at the bottom,
and generally fritter money away on trinkets.

I know I can't go the grocery store and buy food with a half-ounce of gold. And I
don't want my liquid savings in just one form of money. That's why, when I balance
my liquid savings, I count U.S. dollars, gold bullion, silver bullion, and small
amounts of foreign currency.

Right now, my gold and silver bullion position – my "real money" position –
is equal to about 36% of my paper money + bullion total. I know this might
sound like an extremely high level, but most folks are oblivious to the fact that
the U.S. dollar has lost more than 30% of its purchasing power over the past
10 years.

This loss of purchasing power is why I say my idea of liquid savings is more
important than it was 15 years ago. Back then, the U.S. government's balance
sheet wasn't in the sorry shape it is in now. Back then, our government wasn't
in debt to the tune of more than $14.3 trillion (95% of GDP), and we weren't
staring in the face of a record $1.5 trillion budget deficit.

Over the long term, I expect these problems to further weaken the dollar…
Let's say over the next 10 years, my U.S. dollar cash position loses half its
current value. Then, let's say the overall dollar price of gold and silver doubles
 during that time.
From current levels, that'll preserve my purchasing power.

To the dollar-hating critics out there: Yes, I agree. It's hard to argue that you
wouldn't be better off in the so-called "New CASSH currencies": New Zealand
dollars, Canadian dollars, Australian dollars, Swiss francs, Singapore dollars, or
Hong Kong dollars. These countries are in better financial shape than the U.S. By
all means, if you don't like the U.S. dollar, go ahead and hold some alternative
 currency.

My primary point is not what currency you end up in when you're in cash… It's that
many alternatives to cash – stocks, bonds, and commodities, for example – are
expensive and risky right now. So you should be raising and accumulating a
good-sized cash (aka "liquid savings") position for the day when they're cheap
again.

If you really want to get technical about the unattractiveness of the greenback,
where do you stop? After all, all paper currency's intrinsic value is identical to
the U.S. dollar: zero.

The world is a flawed place. Hold your savings in whatever form you must. But
make sure a portion of it is held in gold.

Good investing,