Saturday 11 June 2011

Friday, June 10, 2011

WEBSITE TIED TO IRAN GUARDS PREDICTS NUKE TEST

OBAMA TO ISRAEL: WITHDRAW TO INDEFENSIBLE, PRE-1967 BORDERS OR SUFFER CONSEQUENCES AT UN THIS SEPTEMBER





Senior US Official Tells US Jewish Leaders
Palestinians Want to Avoid UN Showdown

US HOSTAGES HELD BY IRAN BEATEN IN PRISON

OBAMA ADORING, ELITE LIBERAL MEDIA MOVE (ON.ORG) TO END PALIN 2012 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN BEFORE IT EVEN BEGINS



OBAMA ADORING, ISLAMIST-APPEASING, ISRAEL-BASHING,
MIDDLE CLASS-CRUSHING WASHINGTON POST AND CNN
(COMMIE NEWS NETWORK) LEAD MEDIA LYNCH MOB

Click here and here for the nauseating "news" stories.

Clearly, the Obama administration, the leftwing media, and the globalizing power elite that supports the Third World-ization of the United States fear Sarah Palin more than any other declared or likely or possible Republican Presidential candidate.

Palin became a marked woman when she put on that Star of David. Bad enough, in Left/liberal eyes, that she is a staunch supporter of Israel's right to live within defensible borders. Her Christian faith and identification with the Jewish people are unforgivable sins in the age of appeasement of radical Islam.

Palin, more than any Republican leader, is ready, willing, and able to expose Obama's Muslim/Marxist roots--which are strangling America. Hence, the urgent need by the mainstream media to discredit and ridicule her.

POSTSCRIPT: The Palin email "expose" non-story is also a useful tool for pushing Weinergate off the front page. Not for nothing has the liberal loon Chris Matthews defended the disgraced, Obama-backing, liberal Congressman Anthony Weiner as a victim of rural America's "backward" Christians.

Related:



OBAMA ALLOWING IRAN TO BECOME NUCLEAR POWER


The Heritage Foundation on Obama's refusal to deal with the Iranian threat:"The President’s refusal to honestly confront the severity of the Iranian threat — let alone condemn the regime’s actions — is in keeping with his pursuit of his new way in the Middle East, an Obama Doctrine characterized by charming one’s enemies rather than recognizing the realities of the world."

VIDEO BONUS: 'THE MODEL OF A MODERN US PRESIDENT'


Panetta: 'North Korea Growing, Direct Threat to US'

The Case Against 'Islamic Liberalism'

A powerful polemic--from a voice of Pakistan's persecuted Christian minority--over here.

Gates Rebukes Europe on Defense




Question: Why does NATO even exist? The Soviet Union collapsed more than a decade ago, and NATO should have gone with it. Emphasizing the anachronistic alliance, which helps to drain the United States financially, while handcuffing it militarily, has needlessly antagonized Russia.

Logically, Washington, Moscow, and Beijing should have agreed on spheres of influence and new rules of the game of great power competition following the fall of Soviet Communism. A grand new understanding could have led to a new wartime alliance, post-9/11, to crush radical Islam--a common enemy that threatens all of humanity. The world can no longer afford a great game of imperial rivalry in which rightwing political Islam is treated as a force to be manipulated and exploited. (Why shouldn't Russia and China suspect that the U.S. still seeks to use Islam/Islamism to contain and dismember their countries when the U.S. President--himself Muslim-born-and-reared--makes outreach to "the Muslim world" the foundation of his utterly failed foreign policy?)

NATO is a bad joke. Europe is incapable of defending itself. The Continent is more interested in "carbon" cutting than combatting the radical Muslim menace. The European Union, which has eroded the sovereignty of its member nations, furthered multicultural madness, and facilitated the flow of terrorists and radicals across Europe, has (unrealistically) agreed to cut carbon emissions by 20% by the year 2020. What the EU is nowhere near agreeing on--it isn't even on the agenda--is a plan to prevent the Islamist conquest of the Continent.

Thursday, June 09, 2011

The Rise of the Post-American Empires




"As the collapse of the West becomes more obvious, even nations like Japan which were able to embrace the leisure of pacifism under an American umbrella, will have to go and learn war again."

-Daniel Greenfield