Tuesday, 26 July 2011


EU Exploits Norway Massacre to Stifle Dissent
Wasting little time in exploiting the freshly dead bodies of dozens of Norwegian teenagers to push its draconian agenda, the European Union has swiftly announced that it plans to set up an "early warning system" to combat "extremism," the problem being that the EU treats legitimate criticism of its own corrupt institution as extremist.

Nigel Farage

GET UPDATES FROM NIGEL FARAGE



The Government is Scared of the Rise in Euroscepticism

Posted: 15/7/11 12:00 GMT



If we peer above the parapets of the whole phone hacking saga we see other, far more significant developments, with worldwide implications. The press has moved on, now that the rioters have gone back to their tavernas in Athens, but the markets are still rumbling.

It is true to say that the European Union is in one hell of a mess. The credit rating agencies have downgraded Ireland's debts to junk, the Greeks are defaulting, the Italians are in chaos and rumours are abound about the possibility of a massive constitutional change in order to defend its dreams.

The choice faced by the partisans of the European Union is stark - either fall together or fall apart. The problem of course is that while the elite would jump together with the speed of a tabloid phone hack, the peoples of Europe are simply not convinced. All around them they see the foundations of the Euro, the coins in their pockets, being undermined and with it their own personal prosperity. And remember only two countries out of 27 had a vote on the Euro, Denmark and Sweden, and they both voted No. For the rest it was foisted on them. It arrived with inflation and tricks. There is mute acceptance of a financial fact, but no loyalty nor love for the symbol.

Worse still, the choice for the elite is complicated by the position of the UK. Just looking at theopinion polls this week highlights the problem. YouGov and Angus Reid both have the British people taking a remarkably UKIP style position of straight withdrawal from the EU by 2:1. For the first time 50% of those polled have had enough. The statistical breakdown is extremely interesting. All sectors of society, all parts of the country and supporters of all parties now back withdrawal.

This position is now supported by a massive majority of those likely to vote, and a near absolute majority of those entitled to do so. But it is not supported by the tired traditional political parties in Britain, whereas UKIP has EU withdrawal as a key policy. And frankly this scares those in power, they know they are badly out of step with the public.

To head off the electoral threat of UKIP in particular the Government has introduced their so called Referendum lock. They would have us believe that this is being introduced out of some sort of principled Euroscepticism, but the real reason is nothing of the sort. This week David Liddington, the Europe Minister in the coalition has let the cat out of the bag. Talking to the FT,

"He said the offer of a referendum would reassure British citizens and head off the possibility of extremist parties exploiting anti-European sentiment".

Or in other words, they really don't care about our relationship with the EU, what they do care about is their own backsides on the green benches. And if you are branding UKIP extreme, then you are effectively leveling the same charge at a massive chunk of the UK population. The political elite are worried, and rightly so.

Follow Nigel Farage on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Nigel_Farage


Norway attack bolsters web monitoring to track extremists

Candles and flowers are arranged on the ground to mourn the victims of last week's blast in Oslo, Norway.

Candles and flowers are arranged on the ground to mourn the victims of last week's blast in Oslo, Norway.

Photograph by: Wolfgang Rattay, Reuters

TALINN - Estonia is planning to bolster monitoring of the Internet to track potential extremist plots in the wake of last week’s massacre in Norway.

"We’re waiting for the results of the investigation in Norway and after that will certainly look at whether we should make changes in legislation in Estonia," said Erkki Koort, in charge of internal security at the Estonian interior ministry.

"At the moment one thing is clear - as a preventive measure we plan to increase the capacity of Internet monitoring so we can pick up information from the Internet about possible attack plans or anything that can jeopardise internal security," he told AFP.

Anders Behring Breivik, who has admitted to Friday’s bombing and shooting spree in Norway that killed 76, was a member of a Swedish neo-Nazi Internet forum, according to monitors in Stockholm.

Behring Breivik also posted a 1,518-page manifesto on the Internet prior to his assault.

Estonia is at the cutting edge of the battle with online risks, due to its reliance on the Internet.

The nation of 1.3 million, where public services are accessible at a special state portal, has the label "E-stonia".

Since a politically-charged "cyber-war" in 2007 widely blamed on Russian hackers, the Baltic country has become a leader in tracking and fending off online attacks, and hosts NATO’s IT-defence facility.

On Monday, police in Estonia’s neighbour Finland said they would pay closer attention to fragmented pieces of information - known as "weak signals" - in case they connect to a credible terrorist threat.





Unsettling Wariness in Norway, Where Police Are Rarely Armed

Johan Spanner for The New York Times

Norwegian police officers guard the courthouse in downtown Oslo where Anders Behring Breivik was arraigned on Monday. More Photos »



OSLO — When a man dressed in a police uniform began slaughtering young people at a Norwegian summer camp last week, one of the first to be killed was a real police officer named Trond Berntsen, who for years had worked in security at the camp.

Multimedia


Whether Officer Berntsen tried to stop the gunman is still being debated. But facing a man carrying multiple guns and ample ammunition, there was little he could do. Like most other police officers here, he had no weapon.

By law, Norwegian police officers must have authorization from their chief to gain access to a firearm, but they have rarely needed to ask, until recently. Violent crime has been steadily increasing, jolting a society used to leaving doors unlocked and children to play without fear. Coupled with growing criticism over the police’s slow response time to the attacks and confusion about the death toll, which was lowered Monday to 76 from 93, there are growing questions about whether the police are equipped to deal with the challenges.

“Criminals are now carrying weapons, so some people now think that police officers should have weapons as well,” said Gry Jorunn Holmen, a spokeswoman for the Norwegian police union. Though she said it was too early to make any assessments, Ms. Holmen said the union had formed a commission to explore the issue. For the police, she said, “it’s getting tougher.”

It took police SWAT units more than an hour to reach the camp, on Utoya Island, after reports of the shooting came in. Officers had to drive to the shore across from the site of the shooting attack, and use boats to get to the island. A police helicopter was unable to get off the ground; news crews that reached the island by air could only watch as the gunman continued the massacre.

Anne Holt, Norway’s former justice minister, told the BBC: “That makes him a person that killed one person every minute. If the police had actually been there just a half an hour earlier, then 30 young lives would have been saved.”

Officer Berntsen, 51, who was the stepbrother of Norway’s crown princess, was remembered in a service on Monday. It was among the first of dozens of memorial services and funerals expected in the coming days after the rampage. The man identified by the police as the suspect, Anders Behring Breivik, most likely shot more rounds in the hourlong rampage than most Norwegian officers typically fire in a career.

Norway is internationally renowned for its low rates of violent crime, a fact that is a point of pride for many Norwegians. Murders, when they do occur, are front-page news here. In 2009, the last date for which official statistics were available, there were 29 murders in this country of 4.6 million. In Oslo, the capital, high-ranking officials rarely even bother with a security detail.

“You can walk around this city and bump into a leading government minister out promenading on the street and strike up a little conversation before you move on,” said Kristian Berg Harpviken, the director of the Peace Research Institute Oslo.

So it has been jarring for many in the wake of the attacks to see heavily armed commandos stationed outside the gingerbread facades of government buildings. The nation is now plainly on edge, and it is clear, experts say, that some things might have to change.

Norway is one of only three Western European countries lacking a fully armed police force. Most police officers in Britain and Iceland do not carry firearms, either. Norway’s neighbor, Sweden, began requiring its officers to carry guns in 1965.

Over the last decade, the frequency of rape and other assault has inched ever higher, statistics show. Murder rates, however, have remained stable.

The increasing presence of foreign criminal networks active in Norway is part of the reason for higher crime rates, Ms. Holmen and others said, though domestic criminal groups have also become more brazen. Just two days after the attacks, men in military fatigues shot a 27-year-old man to death in his home in southern Norway, Norwegian news outlets reported.

While Norwegian crime rates still look insignificant compared with a country like the United States, the uptick in violence, however small, has unsettled many here.

Currently, only beat police officers in patrol cars have immediate access to weapons. By law, however, they have to remain unloaded and locked in a box in the car unless authorization is given.

Some experts worry that arming police officers all the time will only lead to an escalation of violence as criminals arm themselves in response. For many, though, resistance to the idea has more to do with national pride.

“I would prefer to live in a society where police normally work unarmed,” said Johannes Knutsson, a professor of police research at the Norwegian Police University College. “It is a very forceful and symbolic sign to the citizens that this is a peaceful society.”

Elisa Mala contributed reporting
.