Britannia Radio

1939 USA Planned War Against UK

DATE : Tuesday, 20th. September, 2011.

CHANNEL : 5

TIME : 8 pm

PROGRAMME : Revealed

America's Planned War on Britain : Documentary series. This edition examines War Plan Red, an American military strategy to go to war with Great Britain , which was initially conceived in the Late-1920’s and developed throughout the following decades.

As this is Channel 5, will it be available afterwards on the internet for a while (like the BBC)? If it is I doubt it will be available outside the U.K.

Before I make my own comment on this subject, will somebody please confirm the scheduled time for this programme, as it was initially given to me as 7 PM. I’ve already arranged to visit someone with a television set.

Richard

My Comment:

I've never heard about this before, though I’ve long had a gut feeling that it was / is possible and as some of you will know I have for several years been talking about the depopulation of the North of England: destruction of industry from late 70s leading to population movement south, leaving infrastructure like water, electricity, sewage, capable of supporting a larger population.

I’ve also previously suggested that there may be a hidden agenda behind the invasion of Iraq as well as the Balkans, on top of whatever other apparent motives there may be. Only yesterday I was reading about the current Anglo-French-U.S. destruction of Libya, and noticed a suggestion that reducing the flow of oil might be the motive, as effectively happened in Iraq, rather than the U.S. (aided and abetted by the U.K. as usual) getting her bloodstained hands on more of the stuff. With a world desperate for more hydrocarbon fuel, could the-powers-that-be really want to see less oil flowing?

My working hypothesis is that the N.W.O. are intending to turn the British Isles into a tourist resort for the filthy rich, with shooting, fishing, golf, etc. They are likely planning a similar resort for the Southern Hemisphere – possibly New Zealand – where the seasons are opposite to those in the Northern Hemisphere, and for the eventuality that the British Isles cannot be used for this purpose. A major cull of the population is inevitable.

If the U.S. / North America were to suffer a major natural disaster, such as a super-volcano or comet impact, not only would it wipe out a large part of the population of that region immediately, but many more would die in the aftermath, if not evacuated.

Either of those two types of disaster would throw enough debris into the atmosphere to obscure the sun for long enough to plunge much of the Northern Hemisphere in winter conditions. A prolonged period of below-zero temperatures would wipe out the population of the U.K. (where 2 inches of snow overnight shuts down almost everything!), or if less severe, the North of Britain.

Many U.S. citizens would be airlifted to the U.K. where the non-white immigrant / Muslim population would be shot and their homes given to evacuees. Now do you understand why Black and Muslim immigration is so good? Come on people! How long have I been telling you that Muslim immigration doesn't’t otherwise fit the N.W.O. plan! It would look odd, wouldn’t it, if the U.K. government kept tens of thousands of unoccupied homes, and protected then against vandalism? They’d have to let us in on the secret, and then how would we react?

Next stop Iraq ! As Britain freezes, so the U.S. evacuees – and hopefully some of us – would be taken by air, sea and road, to Iraq , where presumably the U.S. already have all the agricultural equipment needed. U.S. farmers are, in the main, accustomed to wide open spaces, and there are plenty of those in Iraq . There is also the Euphrates River for irrigation. As the world temperature cooled, so U.S. farmers would be set to work planting G.M. crops in the desert. However unappetising that may sound to us whole food and organic veg consumers in dear old England , if any of us are fortunate enough to be taken along, a plate of G.M. maze will taste mighty good.

If the situation is dire, the U.S. will simply invade the U.K. and go to work across the North of England (probably excluding the extreme north and Scotland ). All water tanks from decent domestic premises to major industrial holding and process tanks will have to be drained, and all major industrial processes shut down properly to prevent damage; gas, water and electricity supplies shut off. Alaska and Arctic trained service personnel will be brought in to supply the food and heating need of all key personnel at nuclear power stations, etc., to ensure these are kept ticking over during the prolonged deep winter conditions, which may endure 12 months or even two years.

As the dust particles clear from the atmosphere and the Northern Hemisphere begins to warm up, the survivors will start to move northwards, finding in many parts of inland central Europe , the population reduced or completely gone. Coastal areas of central Europe and the British Isles will probably have no population left, except for those people that have been supplied with the necessary equipment and food to keep them alive.

I have my doubts that anything I’ve said above has anything to do with whatever plans the U.S. may have had in the early part of the 20^th Century to invade the U.K. , so watch the programme!

It anyone found the above interesting, you may find the following of interest too. I received a message this morning from a friend in Australia , and responded… Watch the short video before reading what I have to say. Note that destruction of the U.K. industrial base, led to a reduction in the population in the North, and subsequently to immigrants settling there.

Regards

Richard

---

Diane Sawyer's report, after a brief 15-second commercial.

If you didn't see this on your local news, take 3 minutes to watch it. It's

unbelievable that this could be going on, and on, and on, when our country

is getting deeper in the hole!

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/coins-costing-taxpayers-14076274

You had me fooled for a moment there …

Of course, this was forwarded to you from the USA , but as you have an ABC television station like the USA does, I thought for just a few moments that this item was from Aus. Actually I wasn’t fooled for more than a few seconds, because I was soon saying to myself; something seriously wrong with the accents here!

Well, while we are all constantly being told that printing money causes inflation, and apparently it can in countries like Zimbabwe (you’ve probably seen what I’ve written about Zimbabwe in the past), but it doesn't’t always. I firmly believe that keeping large numbers of people out of work and on benefit – i.e. fixed incomes – is actually what keeps inflation down, and the U.K. and U.S. are good at this! Zimbabwe spends money into her economy and this is what causes the inflation, because there are no fixed benefits.

I am absolutely certain that there is a long-term conspiracy which keeps the U.K. poor, and part of this was destroying her industrial base in the late 70’s and eighties, coupled with issuing insufficient money. The U.K. has too little money in notes and coins in circulation, and what there is in circulation is largely held in the ethnic communities, which don’t use banks, always trade within their communities, and don’t pay their share of taxes!

The curious thing is that the U.S.A. keeps on printing / minting notes and coins and there has been so little inflation that they are using the same basic currency unit after more than two(?) centuries! If the US had the inflation that other countries have then U.S. citizens would be carrying 10 and 50 Dollar coins in their pockets as small change and most goods in the shops would be priced in the hundreds of Dollars!

This is a considerable puzzle, because whilst we know that most of the billions of dollars around the world are illusory (European currency speculators traded in ‘Euro-Dollars’ before the Euro was invented), the U.S. apparently issues millions of new Dollars every year, mainly as notes including the Dollar Bill, and a sizeable proportion of those through the CIA for paying foreign mercenaries, (such as the terrorists which the BBC likes to refer to as ‘rebels’ in Libya) and funding protest movements to destabilise governments it dislikes. (The CIA also has foreign currency notes printed, such as the Afghani it used to pay local warlords in Afghanistan , causing the puppet government in there to issue new notes when Hamid Karzai was put into office.) Maybe dumping Dollars in other countries doesn't’t affect the domestic economy so much.

I think the ABC story is a cover up; simply to satisfy a need to deal with the complaints from people that realized there were so many millions of Dollar coins being minted, and it is costing the taxpayer money to store them. Everything costs the taxpayers money; that’s an ongoing part of the conspiracy, and of no specific significance. It’s my guess that minting coins representing every U.S. president is a ruse: there is a future purpose for them.

The present publicity, is just that; publicity. The U.S. government will get people to take these Dollar coins, perhaps even offering them at a discount to help the poor. The very poor may part with them, but the rest will try to build sets, some of which will be sold to collectors abroad. Is anyone following me on this? What about some speculation as to the eventual objective?

Regards

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxR