The £4 million heist - by Richard... Monday, September 19, 2011

The £4 million heist - by Richard... Monday, September 19, 2011

In the last two financial years, over four million pounds has been fraudulently charged to Council Taxpayers, by one local authority alone. Hundreds more councils are also scamming their taxpayers for total sums which may account for several billions in falsely claimed charges.

The £4-million rip-off is from Bradford MDC. which has responded to our preliminary question on charges for Council Tax court summonses and liability orders, for the financial years 2010/11 and 2011/12.

For these two years, respectively 48,577 and 25,835 summonses were issued. Charges levied were £2,428,850.00 (at £50.00 per case) for 2010/11 and then for 2011/12 so far, £1,420,925.00 (at £55.00 per case) has been charged.

As to liability orders, which permit local councils to take enforcement action for non-payment of Council Tax, in 2010/11, 32,428 were issued. So far this financial year, 18,281 have been issued. Sums charged for the two years are, respectively, £810,700.00 and £457,025.00 (at £25.00 per case).

The total charged, therefore, amounts to £5,117,500 – of which £151,827 has been paid to Bradford Magistrates as court fees (at £3 per liability order), with the balance accruing to Bradford council.

Each document amounts to a single sheet of paper sent out second class to Council Tax defaulters and while the regulations, The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 (as amended), permit councils to charge "costs reasonably incurred", industry experts claim that the amounts charged are grossly excessive.

As regards the summonses, although they purport to be court documents, bearing the Royal Arms and the court logo, they are in fact produced by the council on the same equipment as used for producing reminders. In response to a FOI request last year, the Council admitted that they "run several Reminder runs and Summons runs a month".

Lucy Jackson, speaking for Bradford Council, said that reminders were run generally seven days or more after the payment was due. The summonses were then run 15 days or more after the reminders had been issued.

Direct mailing experts estimate that the unit costs of single mailings should fall within the range of 45p to £1.70. On the scale of the mailings undertaken by Bradford, and the insert type, the lower end of the scale would apply. It would certainly be extremely generous to allow £1.00 for each summons in the 75,000 mailing.

This alone accounts for nearly a £3.5 million overcharge, and by the time the excess charges for the liability orders is taken into account, the sum is well over £4 million.

Nationwide, councils are estimated to levy in the order of £230 million a year in summons and liability order charges and, if that rate had been sustained for the twenty years the regulations have been in force, the cumulative overcharge would run to £4 billion.

However, numbers issued are thought to have increased over the past few years but it seems hardly likely that the overcharging can be less than £1 billion. Groups of volunteers are now mounting a national exercise, using the Freedom of Information Act, to ascertain the precise extent of the overcharge.

In Bradford, Council leader Ian Greenwood, Labour (pictured, top right – centre of pic) has been contacted with the details of his council's overcharging – which has affected some of the poorest and most vulnerable in the community. He has been asked what plans the Council are making to identify the people who have been overcharged, and when they will be repaid,

Of the current cost of £80 for a summons and liability order, taxpayers who have already paid the full amount this year should be entitled to at least a £70 refund.

COMMENT THREAD

Share

Print ready

The only way out is out - by Richard...

As the little Tory muppets struggle with the idea that the Great Leader has sold the pass on "Europe", up pops MP Mark Pritchard to tell us that the Coalition should agree to a referendum on Europe. Reaching down to the great unwashed, the High and the Mighty should graciously ask us mere plebs whether Britain should be "part of a political union or of the trade-only relationship we thought we had signed up to".

"The referendum", he then says, "should be held next year, and a successful 'No to political union' result would immediately strengthen the Prime Minister's negotiating hand in Brussels to commence serious and meaningful negotiations with our partners on Britain's new relationship".

So let's get this right. Pritchard is not exactly suggesting we leave the EU ... simply that we should have a jolly little referendum to keep the plebs happy, and then Dave can have a jolly little chat with those chaps in Brussels about throwing us some bones. In other words, we're talking about exactly the "same old, same old", that Booker, I and so many others have already kicked into touch.

Yet, how easily pleased are so many of the trusting little souls, to judge from some of the comments. Raedwald calls it a specious distraction. Dead dog bounce, on the other hand, regards it as a childish trick. They are both dead right.

This is just typical Tory smoke and mirrors, from incontinent MPs terrified of losing votes over Dave's decision to refuse us a real referendum. Pritchard and his little pals still cannot bring themselves to the point where they confront the reality. But there is no halfway house. You are either in, or you are out. And the only way out is out.