Britannia Radio

ANOTHER READER WRITES (BARELY)

>> MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2011

When I open the Biased BBC mailbox each morning, there are always really good emails. And then there are the droolings of the moonbats who send me the likes of this;

Elders of Zion Message*: I realise that British people who are not traitors long ago gave up bothering to read the inane rubbish on your pathetic "Voice of Tel Aviv" website,but is it not time we asked what would have happened if a group of westernised Arabs had "returned" to the ME after a few thousand years and kicked a settled community of Jewish people of their land with the assistance of the sort of Wall Street vermin who have wrecked the global economy twice (1929 and 2008)? Would the loyal and diminishing band of ignoramic Zionist imbeciles who post on your "Loyalist" (loyal to whom?) grovel to the power of global organised crime be gibbering about their "right to exist"?

I assume that this series of lunatic mails have been prompted by the fact that this site rightly and persistently flags up BBC imbalance of the coverage of Middle East affairs.

So, i just wanted to say to the individual concerned that we shall continue to hold the BBC responsible for how it treats stories from the Middle East and we thank you for your interest.

Labouring under an Illusion

This heartfelt comment by Jarwill101 on the Open Thread deserves a main post.

I liked it, and I’m taking the liberty of reproducing it here. Hope that's okay. “Yvette Cooper's nauseating admission, 'We got things wrong over immigration', has to be challenged.

No, Yvette, credit where credit's due, given New Labour's avowed policy, as revealed by speech writer, Andrew Neather, you got things right over immigration.

You wanted to obliterate the Brtish nation state as rapidly as possible & mass immigration was your weapon of choice. And the beeboids filled the atmosphere with an enveloping, rainbow-tinted iCloud of touchy-feely propaganda to speed the transformation on its way.

Never mind the quality of the incomers, forget their, very often, utter unsuitability, their arrogant refusal to integrate, their immediate reliance on benefits, their propensity for criminality/terrorism.

Our towns & c

ities are now descending into the Second World, a volatile, crowded, violent waiting-room, before the descent into the Third.

Places like Tower Hamlets/Haringey should be the jewels in Yvette's papier-mache crown.

You, Yvette, & your cultural Marxist destructors have ensured that there will never be a harmonious society in this country again. Your job is done, don't be self-effacing about it.

Step out into our wonderful, 'diverse' streets, especially at night, rejoice in the 'enrichment'. Perhaps a kindly passerby will help you count the holes in you face, help you into the ambulance.

I'll wave to you from the river, upon which the indigenous people, & the hard-working, law-abiding immigrants, have been sold down in exchange for the advancement of your own worthless, traitorous little soul.”

Bravo! I would just add though, that the Labour Party’s immigration mea culpa still avoids confronting their most treasonous ‘mistake’.

As far as I’m aware, the type of immigration that they own up to ‘getting wrong’ is the, cheap labour, job-undercutting type, the hardworking Polish builder, and the Eastern European economic migrant.

They serve as a scapegoat for the resentment many people feel over the other kind of immigration. The kind that dare not speak its name, the immigration that is fundamentally at odds with British values, the immigration that really undermines our way of life.

GOING FOR GROWTH?

I take a great interest in the Economy and so I am increasingly perplexed at the BBC/Flanders/Balls meme which suggests the UK can choose either "austerity" or "growth".

This makes no sense but it is how left wing politicians like to portray the situation. I keep hearing BBC interviewers ruminate on whether we should be adopting "Plan B" and choosing growth AS IF this was a real option. It's not!!

The current UK government - indeed any government - will always prefer to see economic growth.

But that is virtually beside the facts that; a/ We have a massive structural debt as a result of years of Labour fiscal recklessness that must be addressed even if it means fewer Diversity Czars and b/ Economic growth is a desirable outcome, not a specific policy.

This is an entirely bogus argument which has been advanced by the BBC on behalf of Labour for some months now. It is also shameless because the very Labour politicians such as Balls who wrecked our economy are now posturing as the saviours of it and rather than interrogate the inherent hypocrisy and fiscal folly of what is being advocated, they simple cheer-lead for this mindlessness.

I disagree with plenty of things the Coalition are doing but for anyone to pretend that it is wilfully ignoring "growth" is just plain nonsense and the BBC really needs to get to grips with itself on this issue.