A short essay please circulate
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:23:49 +0100
OK So You Want Me To Write As An Academic? A Modern Dilemma....
Guy Leven-Torres
11th October 2011
I have never made it a secret that I write for people that think.
However one had to choose a style that did not bore or tire. One of the
major problems I have and perhaps you too, is that a lot of the
Internet scribblers of fame are not exactly unreadable but dull. In
academia simple recitation of knowledge is not enough- anybody can read
books and blind the world with science or rather become a walking
encyclopedia. Even you could do this if you had the time. That does
though not make one a good writer.......I repeat a passage from my
article yesterday-
One things I have noted about the Internet is the plethora of dull
people- rather sad people actually who hide behind false names and set
themselves up as self-admiring Fonts of Prophecy And Social Comment,
casually espousing and disseminating their pearls of wisdom to an
enraptured readership. They never reveal their real names but
nevertheless continue to act like some Tibetan or Indian holy man or
woman, or like Peter Sellars the actor in the film 'Being There', in
which his silence is taken by the fashionable elite as the sign of
innate wisdom and intelligence- a paragon of deep thought and
profundity, instead of the subnormal child he is in a man's body.
Silence should not be an excuse for lack of understanding or
knowledge...
In an age like ours with the deliberate deconstruction and rewriting of
history, the slow eradication of knowledge itself and the Marxist
aculturalification of the same supported and encouraged by a Far Left
Media- for that is what we actually face- that has stupified and
ignorified several generations of our youth in pursuit of the elite's
desire for a Global Socialist Multicultural Paradise, even people like
myself can achieve 'fame' and notoriety simply because I have
'knowledge' and the positive advantage of being older and born and
educated in a time in private education, wherein teachers and academics
were still that, not lunatic iconoclastic activists ranting and
storming through the Long March Through The Institutions, as Marx
demanded. It may shock you to know that I am just an ordinary soul with
a passion for Rome and a wider interest in history. I am not sure if I
can even write, as anger is no substitute for real talent, even if my
writings are passionate and ring a bell with others in like mind. No
dear reader I am an ordinary soul. Many, perhaps the majority have been
turned off by my style that has been regarded as 'fringe',
'overheated', 'mad' and the best metaphor a 'David Ike Wannabe'. Yes I
can laugh at myself and appreciate wit. I laughed like a drain for
example when the New Labour Leader Milliband, was apparently known as
'Bluebottle' , a character from the 1950s 'Goon Show' by older members
of his party. Older Lefties do have sense of humour. I have no problem
with them at all, or at least these ones but their modern successors I
do have a massive one. And please, please do not accuse me of false
modesty.
However what am I to do when anybody with a bit of sense can see where
we are headed? Our countries and cultures are all but ruined, our
economies about to collapse in a crisis that is historically more like
a Deluge than a simple Depression, that most likely will finish a
Western Civilisation,-swamped by freeloading migrants existing on
welfare paid by us, white hating Marxist governments who hate Europe
too, whole disenfranchised national populations, a vile lazy press that
has done its utmost to further the same Long March above by demonising
people like us that do not agree with their objectives like replacing
the British society and population with an Islamic one that suits there
world view better and a financial philosophy, that condemns our future
enslaved generations to not only servitude of the mind and body but
penury as well. We are on the verge of a Dark Age and I see no
alternative, simply because people across this country and others
wallow in their own fear and apathy, so allowing the elite to destroy
us.
Thank God this is not the 1930s when a not dissimilar enemy stood at
our gates but who in many ways, makes the current one look almost tame
and who would never have dreamed of doing what the modern conquerors
have done, in deliberately and systematically handing us over to a
pagan religion called Islam, that they know full well will destroy the
West for good. This has always been the goal of Marx and others who
loathed it. However these collective historical and modern
self-haters-after all they are part of the same society- in their wish
to cleanse their guilt have also destroyed themselves in much the same
manner as the late Roman imperial elite did to themselves, although not
with the intention of exterminating 500,000,000 Europeans through
social engineering via projects like the EU that to this author at
least, is a weapon of mass social destruction. Only a megalomaniac
mindset could do what is being done today and pursue its purpose even
in the face of reason and nature, that have clearly shown it will
simply not work, as the continual endless bailouts demonstrate to the
point of self immolation or self imposed parody of Hitler's Final
Solution.
I don't think I can recall in all my studies that have covered most of
known history, even the esoteric, there is a single example of any
elite or people actively seeking to commit sui-cultural-cide, so not
only is this modern situation unique but unprecedented in its pure
evil. In my latest book I argue that we are run by literally mentally
ill people- psychopaths in fact. I could take the Hegelian view that
Marx and other 'thinkers' were simply part of the hidden ageless
'genus' of history, in which they were only an expression of the above
as almost involuntary actors and that what we see today, is but the
final consequences of our pre-programmed self-destructive impulses that
may be related to our expanding populations. There is no doubt that
population does affect behaviour as Malthusian paradigms showed, even
if he was wrong in other core hypotheses. However I argue vehemently
that I do not think population and its exponential growth can be to
blame for the rise of Socialism, so effectively destroying Hegel's
assumptions.
When my father was born in 1922, there was only 2.5 billion people in
the world. When I was born in 1953, there were hardly many more,
especially after a major war that killed perhaps 100,000,000. Today we
face a population of 7 billion souls, most if not the majority in the
Third World, totally unable to support itself, let alone feed its ever
expanding mouths, except with western aid and a soppy elite that feels
manufactured or borrowed self-guilt, that defy the quantum mechanics of
the manifold Reality of Kantian time observation, in which the High
German philosopher proved beyond doubt that we observe time, it does
not observe us but also that it only exists, because we have knowledge
of it. No I am now satisfied that it was Socialism and Socialists
itself that has brought us to our present state of affairs of
civilisational collapse but also our arrogant assumption that we must
save the world from itself. The Third World population is expanding due
to the aid and success of exported finance and technology, that the
Moslem world in particular was incapable of inventing or making.
Modern Socialism grew out of late Victorian 'Fabianism' named after
Fabius Cunctator, or 'Delayer', the famous Roman republican Dictator
who realised that Hannibal's ancient form of blitzkrieg was
undefeatable, unless he was denied access to battle and supplies. It is
a known fact that many Fabians were products of a British public and
Grammar school system, based upon Classical History and language. I am
one myself and the argument has been made that these older Socialists
were reflecting the borrowed guilt of a dead people and empire,
confused between their own Christianity and guilty admiration they felt
for their Classical subject matter- the Romans. We observe the same
schizophrenic behaviour in the early Church, wherein in the early
theologians tried to eradicate ancient pagan learning and wisdom by
substituting a false Christian past and philosophy in its place. in
much the same manner as modern leftists and Moslems have done today.
However, the success of Christianity itself was their own undoing,
since they failed to realise that many of the famous Christian writers
and even saints were steeped in paganism and thought themselves- after
all the New Testament and even the Old, were reliant upon a form of
Greek -everyday language- known as koine. Paul had been a follower of
Mithras and even Augustine who wrote the 'City of God', was an ex
lapsed pagan-Christian, who had delved a little too deeply into
forbidden thought and former heretics always make the best zealots.
Look at the converted 'Jew' Torquemada or even Paul himself after their
'conversion'. However, these men were astute, intelligent and
enlightened enough to realise, that in destroying the very pagan
civilisation their own was predicated upon, they would annihilate
themselves and the Church too. Constantine was no fool, even if his
successors like Phocas were.....
I lay the blame for our current situation solely upon the advent of
Socialism. I am utterly convinced this is so, not from any emotional
need but a purely objective scholarly assessment. Look at any crisis in
the last 100 years from the 1917 Revolution, even the Great War, the
Second, The Cold War, The Moslem Brotherhood, Arab nationalism, The EU
and even mass migration and Moslem desires for a global Kalipahte we
see today in scenes like '9/11', or elsewhere in the world and all one
has to do in order, to see the Socialist and its amoral psychopathic
agenda, is simply to scratch the shallow veneer of its latest disguise.
It is the viral ideology of global suicide and madness- quite literally
too. If the West falls as I expect it will, as the Moslem Kaliphate
takes shape in the so called 'Arab Spring'- a term invented by the
puerile 'Useful idiots' standing on the sidelines applauding, or even
directly involved in the their own destruction, it will be quickly
realised that in doing what they are doing, nothing will be left to
replace what has been lost. Ninety-nine percent of modern technology
was invented by the West but in particular the English speaking world.
China and even the old USSR may have clever scientists and engineers
but it was only in their ability to copy those same in designs and
technology captured from the West. The original nuclear bomber force
the Soviet airforce used, were simply nut and bolt copies of a captured
B29. Even the much vaunted kalashnikov was a copy of a German example.
They only exist because the West invented them like it did philosophy
and music in the likes of Beethoven and Goethe. Kill the source of
ideas and the copycat branches and facsimiles it spawns quickly wither.
If the West goes so will most of the Second and Third World- a world
that would simply perish having chewed the hand away upon which it
relies in entirety......
Think about that perhaps? This is happening now as I write so it is no
longer 'fringe' either but real, if you did but care to look.
Guy
Posts
