Britannia Radio

A HAPPY NEW YEAR? ...

(david icke)

hh

So we are here at last: the all-singing, all-dancing, world famous, 2012.

Is it the end of the world? Or the start of a new one?

I say neither.

Some of the 2012 hype has become just plain silly and we have probably seen nothing yet.

I have been saying since 1990 ( hh since 1975) that we were in the midst of a vibrational change (new force arriving)– the result of an (increased consciousness) information change in the waveform construct of the Universe – which would awaken ( those that are open) humanity from its aeons of manipulated slumber.

This is now clearly happening as millions upon millions of people worldwide open their minds to another view of self and reality.

I had still more confirmation over the Christmas break when I met people I have known for decades who were suddenly ‘getting it’.

They were ‘No, not him or her, they’ll never get it’ people and yet the solidity of their intellectual-vibrational ‘box’ is now being breached by the spontaneous ‘insight’ that they and the world are not what they thought they were.

I have no problem, therefore, with the theme of energetic transformation bringing ‘five-sense’ transformation to human society.

I just don't buy the 2012 Mayan calendar stuff, or the interpretation of it, that’s all. For me, the real significance of 2012 is that it is not 2011. But, then, it is not 2013, either.

The energetic/information change that I dubbed the 'Truth Vibrations’ in 1990 is not a one-year wonder.

It has been easing its way into the information construct of our experienced reality for decades, especially since the (hh-1970s)1980s, and it has been increasing its power and influence ever since ...

... There is also another potential significance for 2012 – how the Control System could exploit the hype and mystique of 2012 to make it seem like the prophecies about the end of the world in their many forms are really happening.

This brings me to the gathering storm now targeting almost every aspect of human life.

No, it's not … but that is what they will want us to believ