The Today website is no longer providing clips of every part of the programme. No explanation, but I assume it’s something to do with the cuts. Hmm. More importantly, as stories about failed rogue states, Islamist wars, terrorism and piracy reach a crescendo, why doesn’t anyone publicly acknowledge there’s connection between them all? The only factor that determines whether the BBC sees Islamic terrorists as good or bad seems to be whether they are known to have links with Al Qaeda. Anyone catch this John Humphyrs interview with William Hague on Today this morning. What fascinated me was how a discussion regarding what could be done to help those people suffering under the Assad regime in Syria suddenly was switched by Humphyrs into trying to get Hague to say that the UK would never support military action against...Iran. And in particular, should Israel move against the Mad Mullahs, would the UK ensure no support whatsoever would be afforded. To be fair to Hague he did repeat the line that NO options are off the table but it's the way in which the BBC seems to have linked Assad's butchery of his own people to that of Israel seeking to prevent the annihilation of their people at the hands of the thugs in Tehran. As I recall there was a similar attempted "gotcha" last week using the same trick and it makes me think the BBC worry more about Israel defending itself than Iran attacking it. I've had an exchange in the past day with New Statesman Editor Medhi Hasan and he articulates a defence for Iran that I believe will become the narrative for the BBC as conditions deteriorate.
Confused
>> THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2012
IRAN, ISRAEL AND SYRIA
Thursday, 23 February 2012
Posts
