Britannia Radio

What Will It Take?

Guy Leven-Torres

21^st March 2012

I was asked to write this as a 'Last post'. I have tried my level best to awaken people and also explained in detail why we have a moral duty to do what we must to take our country back. In short private corporations run the land- a state of affairs in which they have absolutely no right to do what they have done to us.

I used to admire Margaret Thatcher but no longer for she is but another drone of the criminal evil elite. Did you know for example that she was hesitant about taking the Falklands back and had to be forcefully persuaded by her Chiefs of Staff to mount an invasion of the islands to regain them? Arthur Scargill was quite correct when he said the government was out to destroy the Mining industry. The Unions hardly helped though, especially in the hands of selfish barons, demanding ever higher wages that literally challenged the elected Government of the day as to who should rule Britain. However was there any need to dismantle our industries like car manufacturing, electronics companies, petrochemical industries, nuclear industry, aerospace industries, steel manufacturers and a host of others, including the finest inventions the world has ever seen? Did we need to give away so much? We invented the intercontinental nuclear delivery system but gave it to the US under pressure to an America, ever fearful of an independent powerful United Kingdom with its own deterrent. Even today it is British ingenuity that leads the world in medicine, computing software, special effects, quality hand built cars and furniture but compared to what we were only 30 short years ago, our present situation is terribly sad. We have been asset stripped by thieves and a politically inept 'elite, most of whom should be in prison for their shocking betrayal of the British people.

People are now becoming aware that the 'elite' has created a ravenous violent monster in their midst. Even the modern Volkischer Beobachter, the leftist mouthpiece BBC, has finally aired a programe on the utterly disgraceful 'honour' murders of young Moslem brides and the serial rape and murder of their white peers in parts of Northern England. The Police and the bureaucrats, fearful of being called racist or 'culturally insensitive', have largely chosen to ignore these poor women and the vile vampires that prey upon them before disposing of their bodies. In my moral book, these 'authorities' are guilty after the fact, or of being in collusion and accessory in the actus reus of the crime. As much as they deny their guilt, they still fully intended to ignore these heinous events and should face the full penalty of the law.

These people are also guilty of constant abuse of public offices, for which the penalty can lead to life incarceration. They have actively, either in ignorance or with full intent ignored the Common Laws of England and its charters like Magna Carta but also statutes like the The Act of Settlement that established William and Mary upon the English throne. Even worse they have ridden roughshod over the Rule of Law and gradually but stealthily, dismantled the ancient English legal system of Common Law courts, and the various divisions of High Court over which the Lord Chancellor- a position that the criminal Blair tried to abolish- presided to replace all with a New Star Chamber and the disgusting European Arrest Warrant, that leaves a British subject defenceless and deported simply on the whim of a bureaucrat. Under 'European law', a website bearing an article written in the UK, seen in another part of the EU can have the writer extradited. British subjects have no protection from foreign laws, even for crimes that are not even such in the UK, or even commited in the land of the extradtiion requester in a complete reversal of the principles of habeas corpus and Magna Carta. Only one law may exist within the British Isles- the Common Laws as established by William the 1^st and his immediate successors.

A law to be lawful, as I have explained on many an occasion, must be seen to be moral, just (Equity- that has paramountcy in English Law) and applicable to all subject to the Queen's Peace. This is no idle language of an idealist, or dilettante with an historical passion for ancient laws and precedent but a living fully functioning requirement of Common Law. Laws that discriminate in favour of one particular section or group in society, cannot withstand the test of legality, since they themselves are an afront to the aforesaid Queen's Peace and therefore illegal and those that espouse them guilty of several offences, including Treason under the original acts of 1351/2 ad subsequent legislation up to the modern day. Despite Blair's attempt to revoke them, he has no power to do so, nor does a 'Sovereign' Parliament because in doing so they render themselves and the other constituents of Governance like the Monarch, Commons, Lords and all the other parts powerless by denying their own Right to govern on the People's behalf and such a situation is therefore impossible.

Parliament is at the end of the day simply an 'Executive' voted into office every five years or so but subject to the Queen as representative of the Common people. Laws must be moral and just and must not, encourage behaviour harmful to the person or wider society. Believe it or not such acts, are against the person- an assault and dependent upon the level of physical or mental discomfort experienced, may well incur other illegalities such as indecency and in the worst cases, grievous bodily harm. Such recent legislation as 'aggravated religious hatred' or proposed 'same sex marriage', even existing 'civil partnerships', may actually be 'offences against the person', in that they not only offend public decency and behaviour but remove the lawful and natural status of men and women to be recognised in their unique gender and function that make up the family by encouraging irresponsible and profligate behaviour, harmful to them, their unborn offspring and therefore wider society. Such law is actually illegal and contrary to the Rule of Law, so cannot exist, despite what the 'elite' say. All good law is subject to natural conditions of existence. These are not 'Rights' but inalienable prerogatives as sovereign beings. No amount of wicked or emotive legislation can change that fact. They are self evident truths recognised by moral beings dating back thousands of years; traditional marriage is one of them and must enjoy the full protection of Law. No legislature has any 'right' to alter this, not even the Church since even under canon Law, the Church can only give approval to what is an inherent duty to procreate. The secular state has even less authority to alter this fact.

This is not bigotry or 'hatred' but simply a statement of law. Likewise the establishment of 'sharia' is illegal and treasonable within the Realm and the unequal treatment of women within the Moslem faith that are its often unwilling victims, also a matter of assault but behaviour likely to cause a Breach of the Peace. All the above are arrestable offences by the way, subjecting any person or persons involved, even ignorant of the fact, liable to detainment by the state, usually through the office of Constable, even a private person if they believe and indictable-arrestable offence has been commited at Common Law. They certainly have a duty to lay such information before an officer of the Law or a magistrate.

Many of the Police forces of the UK have been privatised. In doing so the individuals or groups that have done this, have effectively removed against their will, thousands of Police Officers from the Office of Constable, so removing their right of arrest but effectively turned them into private security employees, whose acts against any subject in pursuance of their 'duty' now amount to an offence against the person, assault, even with battery and in the worst cases, if detained kidnap and false imprisonment. In being removed to a private corporation they have no more power to detain than a fellow subject and probably less.

Likewise, the proposals to make motorists pay for use of the Queen's Highway is another illegality alien to Common Law. No person, or persons shall inhibit or obstruct the Highway but shall allow without let or hindrance all her Majestys' subjects to go about their lawful business. Such behaviour shall be construed an offence, not only against the person but also be treated as a Breach of the Peace. It is also an arrestable offence.

I have writen this article as a kind of postscript to demonstrate as practically as I can the serious state of illegality that now exists within the UK. I think we are months away from violence and possible serious civil unrest, for which the authorities by their utterly illegal behaviour must be held, fully responsible by their abject refusal to obey the law but who seem intent on continuing there rapine and illegal, immoral behaviour in an incessant attack upon their own electorates. I would like to see a replay of the Nurenburg Trials or a raising of a new 'General Eyre', to lay charges against these diverse persons with a view to bringing the above to justice and the restoration of the Common Law of the UK, together with a re-establishment of Equitable jurisdiction and Action in Tort against them too, so that we may once again live under our own laws, not the wicked importations of alien powers and religions, that have no place in this land, neither now, in the past or in the future.

Now I shall continue to enjoy my well earned rest......