Even if the Islamists do not take over the West Bank in the aftermath of a
unilateral Israeli pullout, it is almost certain that the Palestinian
Authority would not be able to prevent local gangs and clans from seizing power.
Recipe for War: Unilateral Withdrawal from West Bank
by Khaled Abu Toameh
Gatestone Institute June 8, 2012 at 5:00 am
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3101/unilateral-withdrawal-west-bank
As before, Hamas's chances of taking over the West Bank are high after the
failure of Abbas's ruling Fatah faction to implement significant reforms or
combat rampant corruption.
Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak believes that Israel should consider a
unilateral withdrawal from the West Bank if negotiations with the
Palestinian Authority fail to bear fruit.
Under the current circumstances, such a move would lead to the creation of
another radical Palestinian Islamic entity, this time in those parts of the
West Bank that would be handed over to Mahmoud Abbas and Salam Fayyad.
Any land that is handed over to the Palestinian Authority would end up in
the hands of Hamas.
In the summer of 2005, Israel pulled out of the Gaza Strip, passing it to
Abbas and his 40,000-strong Fatah-dominated security forces.
A few months later, thanks to a free and fair parliamentary election that
was held at the request of the US and some EU countries, Hamas came to
power.
One of the main reasons Hamas scored a victory in that election was because
it took credit for driving Israel out of the Gaza Strip through rockets and
suicide bombings.
A year later, in the summer of 2007, it took fewer than 10,000 Hamas
militiamen to defeat Abbas's security forces and bring down the entire
Palestinian Authority regime in the Gaza Strip.
Hamas's rule over the Gaza Strip has since brought more suffering and
bloodshed for both Israelis and Palestinians.
Once Israel carries out a unilateral withdrawal, the same scenario is likely
to be repeated in the West Bank.
Even though Hamas does not have a strong military presence in the West Bank,
the movement seems to enjoy much popularity among Palestinians.
The so-called Arab Spring, which has seen the rise of Islamists to power in
a number of Arab countries, has emboldened Hamas and other radical
Palestinian groups, such as Islamic Jihad.
These groups have managed to attract many followers by offering themselves
as the best alternative to Western-backed corrupt secular dictatorships in
the Arab world.
As before, Hamas's chances of taking over the West Bank are high after the
failure of Abbas's ruling Fatah faction to implement significant reforms or
combat rampant corruption.
Fatah lost the 2006 parliamentary election mainly because of its leaders'
involvement in the embezzlement of public funds. Since then, Fatah has
failed to draw the conclusions from its defeat and has not even been able to
come up with a new list of capable candidates that could attract Palestinian
voters.
The same Fatah men who lost the vote are, in fact, continuing to run the
show in Ramallah -- as if they had never lost.
Even if the Islamists do not take over the West Bank in the aftermath of a
unilateral Israeli pullout, it is almost certain that the Palestinian
Authority would not be able to prevent local gangs and clans from seizing
power.
The case of Jenin, a city in the West Bank, is a good example of the
weakness of the Palestinian Authority security forces, especially with
regard to imposing law and order: Palestinian Authority officials have
admitted that Jenin has been controlled over the past two years by Fatah
militiamen and thugs who worked closely with many top Palestinian security
officers, imposing a reign of terror and intimidation on the city's
residents.
A unilateral withdrawal from the West Bank could mean that Palestinian
cities like Ramallah, Nablus, Jenin, Bethlehem and Hebron would fall either
into the hands of Hamas or armed Fatah gangs.
Abbas and Fayyad would not be able to do much to prevent a return to scenes
of anarchy and lawlessness that were once prevalent on the Palestinian
street.
The chaos and violence inside the Palestinian cities would also spill over
into Israel, forcing it to launch another "Defensive Shield" type of
operation, like the one in 2002, to clear the area of armed gangs.
Before withdrawing from any area, Israel needs to make sure that those who
would be in charge would not run away, handing the territories to Hamas or
any other local gangs. Under the current circumstances, a unilateral and
unconditional withdrawal would only be a recipe for more violence and
bloodshed and repression
--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website: www.imra.org.il
Monday, 11 June 2012
Posted by
Britannia Radio
at
12:52














