Sunday, 29 July 2012



Religion Or Culture?


Guy Leven-Torres


29th July 2012

 



Part of my job is to ensure words and language constructs are clearly defined and clearly understood. One of my greatest detestations with both the Marxists and their Islamic patrons, is the use of so called dialectic in which words used by the latter, mean something completely different from what you or I might think. This is after all what lies at the base of the disgusting political correctitude we have thrust in our face today. I call 'PC'- Paradological Nihilism in the sense that it substitutes the subject of a sentence or word for its own warped versions, that appear to be close to, or even the same as the original. The ultimate result is that having destroyed the subject by a form of parodical mimicry, it quite literally eliminates it altogether and literally changes it forever and infects the way people think and speak.


The most glaring example is the intent of the UK Government to change a 10,000 year old meaning of traditional marriage to incorporate 'same sex unions'. This is being achieved by lowering the standard of proof of legal union, from penetration and breaking of the female vaginal hymen to penetration up another man's rear orifice, or removing any idea of physical penetration altogether, since two women cannot under any circumstance. What people fail to realise, is that by abolishing this physical requirement for consummation of marriage- a legal requirement to prove the union actually exists but failure to do so long used by the Church and other religions to annul marriage and release the spouses, from further commitment together. I apologise for the seeming crudity in this matter but there really is no alternative when it comes to legalising or enforcing behaviour and desires, that only a few years ago was regarded as a crime at best and a mortal sin at worst. The Roman Army prescribed death for such behaviour as did the Royal Navy until well into the last century.


People these days are taught what to think, not how to. They fail to grasp the extraordinary results should the Church and concerned Christians, even Moslems fail to halt this assault upon traditional matrimony. The family is the bedrock of any society. The traditional marriage between man and woman to breed children and stay loyal, has more or less become a fringe activity today. Instead we have a polyglot multifaceted form of relationships in which all involved suffer the consequences, as one can see around any UK corporation estate, in the feckless behaviour and gangs that congregate during twilight hours, causing massive social nuisance and even violent deaths. I have been victim to the behaviour of these gangs and had to sell up and move away. The experience was horrendous. I suffered a breakdown that ruined my business.


What must be grasped is that, by altering the legal definition of marriage, this will inevitably alter beyond recognition the character and behaviour of wider society. We are now seeing the result of 40 years of feminisation of society- which if one were to be honest, should be termedhomosexualisation of society, since this has been the queer agenda for decades but especially traditional modes of Christian marriage and the 'normalisation' of such behaviour, with hetersexuality becoming the abnormal and sinful. Today, behaviour and circumstances, once only common to homosexual 'communities' is now general to the heterosexual community that once formed the law abiding majority. The list of such circumstance does not make pleasant reading-


Unstable relationships

Fecklessness and sexual profligacy

Lack of commitment and responsibility

Disease and poor health

Mental Illness

Alcoholism and drug dependency

Suicide

Abuse and violence towards 'partners'

Moral depravity

General social demoralisation

Cheapening of life

Lowering of quality of life

Chronic insecurity

Extreme poverty

Suffering of children

Crime


The Romans regarded as effeminate, men who would not marry and raise children but most importantly remain faithful to his wife. This charge of effeminacy made towards Caesar by his enemies, did not just include his rumoured affairs with the King of Bithynia but the fact he cuckolded many of his opponents, by sleeping with their wives. As his soldiers said, 'Every wife's King but every man's Queen'. It seems that in today's' Tory party, up to 30% of its MPs maybe limp-wristed, hence the ongoing march to homosexualise the state and society. Police have already prosecuted young heterosexual men for rejecting unwelcome advances under so called 'homophobic hate laws'. It will destroy us. Turds are no substitute for children. Again I apologise for being crude but this is effectively what we are doing.


Then we come to a particular pet hate of mine- the confused area of meaning when it comes to race and religion. The British Police have arrested and seen goaled men and women for burning the so called 'holy' Koran. As far as I know there is no such 'crime' in the UK but this conflates an act of political protest with 'race'. Since when has race become 'religion'?


As you are by now familiar, I do not have any proof that there is such a thing as 'Islamic Civilisation'. All that I have read, or excavated predates the advent of Islam, in form and style but carries on into the so called 'Islamic' era. If anything, Islam has acted as a brake upon civilisational advance, even primitivising and reversing the process. We are seeing this happen in the West today as we Islamise. A Religion is a belief- it is not a culture. How could it be?


Do beliefs construct cities or cultures? No they do not. The religious belief may influence how that culture evolves for good or bad but Islam, or even Christianity cannot be equated with culture. Cultures take aeons to evolve and as proof I cite the conversion of the Romano-Hellenic world to Christianity. Overnight, Roman civilisation did not become 'Christian Civilisation' – Churches did not suddenly spring up but Christian thought, did influence society and thought over time, but the culture remained what it always was and still is even today- Roman. Christianity's history in it dealings with its adherents, is hardly a endorsement for civilisational advance prior to the huge release of human creativity that began with the arrival into Europe of Byzantine scholars, fleeing Arab invasions but Islam itself has in one's own opinion, an even worse 'pedigree' for the horrors it visited on Mankind. Christianity preserved civilisation and learning, where as Islam seems throughout its history determined to destroy all it infects.


Finally, sooner rather than later, people are going to have to face fact that unless we act with courage and stolid determination, we will succumb, within a decade at most to the will of Allah. They already have the Obama Administration in their clutches. I will if necessary physically resist by any and all means possible, even if it costs me my life. I am absolutely serious about this. I could not live with the shame of having done nothing and sometimes- and no doubt many will scoff- life has become so unbearable, death and danger are preferable. That is how I was raised, even if many regard such beliefs and actions as 'romantic' or 'cranky' or 'outdated'. I am nobody's slave and that is why I write under my real name, despite all the abuse and write articles that could render me liable for up to 10 years in jail under the latest EU sharia compliant laws.


This is why I ask my readers who are at the receiving end of 'PC' policing or officious bureaucracy and fines to note the names, numbers and as much information as one can, with a view to future prosecution.....Store them somewhere safe.


Guy