Sunday, 22 July 2012


E U BRIEF

Spanish parliament seeks power to crackdown on protestors

19 July, 18:48

(ANSAMed) - Madrid, July 19 - Spain's parliament introduced a motion to reinforce security at "demonstrations and concentrations of citizens" Thursday, as protests toward government austerity measures to cut 65 billion euros from public spending drew crowds in Madrid.

The motion would introduce a new crime to the penal code - that of "urban violence" committed during demonstrations and meetings - as well as possible "preventative" imprisonment for menacing behavior such as possession of dangerous materials, possession of tools that could be used for illegal acts, and concealment of identity by donning ski masks, head scarves and the like.

The initiative, which drew bitter criticism from left and center parties, also proposes non-prison penalties for organizing "activities that alter public order" via Internet, such as diffusing information intended to promote participation in protests.

"Activities that alter public order" would also be redefined to include passive resistance and disobedience of authorities, proposes creating a national register of perpetrators to track repeat offenders.

The motion drew bitter criticism from Spain's center and left opposition parties. Pedro Jose' Munoz, a spokesperson for the leftist PSOE party, called the motion "a precedent that recalls the penal code of Franco", referring to Fancisco Franco, a nationalist dictator who ruled Spain from 1936 through the early 1970's.

Munos added it was an "absolutely unnecessary" change to the "law that governs the right to demonstrate and to meet", because it risks the "criminalization of all those who in these days are demonstrating against the unjust measure passed by the government."



Europe

Between east and west, a gulf of stereotypes

16 July 2012


In the Netherlands, Eastern Europeans have replaced Muslims as a target of the far right. The hostility is fed by clichés widespread throughout Western Europe, regrets a Lithuanian journalist, who admits that his own countrymen are not free from prejudice.

“Are you having trouble with immigrants from Central and Eastern Europe? We want to hear!” The website of the far-right Dutch party welcomes visitors with this question spiced with encouragement. Geert Wilders, leader of the Freedom Party and known for his diatribes against Islam and Muslims, has discovered a new vein to mine for the backing of the average Dutch voter. In February his party launched a website designed to gather evidence on the problems caused by “the Poles, Bulgarians, Romanians and other eastern Europeans.”

According to the National Statistics Office of the Netherlands, about 200,000 eastern Europeans settled in the country legally in 2011. The 136,000 Poles make up the majority, followed by 2,708 Lithuanians, 1,885 Latvians and 665 Estonians. In a country of 17 million, this represents just over one percent.

It is intriguing that the far right’s hatred for immigrants who do not respect Western values has switched target. After September 11, Islam and Muslims became the scapegoats for all the ills of society; today, it’s the eastern Europeans who play this role.

A paradoxical situation

Simon Kuper, a Financial Times journalist originally from the Netherlands, sees several reasons for this phenomenon. Firstly, the Netherlands tend to limit immigration from outside the borders of the Union, and the number of Moroccans and Turks is decreasing.

Secondly, Muslims integrate more easily. They speak Dutch at home and do not occupy top ranking in the crime statistics. It is not surprising, according to Simon Kuper, that the incomers from central and eastern Europe that arrived en masse in western Europe a few years ago are slowly becoming the “new Muslims”. In Western eyes they’re stamped “post-Soviet”, speak incomprehensible languages, and seem just as foreign as the Turks or the Moroccans.

The footprint of the Cold War continues to divide Europeans from West and East. The latter have become another rhetorical tool for the populists. Discrimination against the eastern Europeans is fed by the fact that they are considered less “European” than western Europeans – less civilised, and less tolerant.

There are clear reasons for this. Unlike Westerners, eastern Europeans are not “politically correct” and ply a rather explosive cocktail of intolerance – hatred of blacks, homophobia and anti-semitism – that has become taboo in the West.

The experience of emigration does not cure the Lithuanians of intolerance. Quite the contrary. Returning home from London, Dublin or the Nordic countries, they tell stories about the blacks, Muslims and other non-Europeans who occupy western Europe, further reinforcing local prejudices. Above all, they do not recognise that they themselves can also be seen as “occupiers” in Western eyes.

It is precisely that racism, homophobia and lack of democracy that western Europeans trot out to justify their differences from eastern Europeans. It is, to say the least, a paradoxical situation that it is in the West where the xenophobia and racism being taken up by nationalist parties is becoming heard ever more loudly.

“The darkness in people's souls”

Euro 2012, which has just ended, was the perfect symbol of this stigmatisation. The Western press seized the opportunity to talk about problems of eastern Europe, reinforcing stereotypes born in the last century. Countless articles were published on racism and anti-semitism in Poland, the working classes in Ukraine and the promiscuous women of eastern Europe.

Before the European Football Championship started, a Dutch television advertisement encouraged women to make sure not to let their men leave for the Ukraine or Poland. “Ladies: sign up for three or five years with the Netherlands energy company and get a free draft-beer dispenser”, suggested a female voice in a conspiratorial tone.

The ad is a clear example of sexism and racism. Eastern European women are presented as Dutch women would never be. No wonder that the Ukrainian activists of FEMEN, famous for their topless public actions, greeted Euro 2012 with the slogan “Ukraine is not a whorehouse”.

Yet this is one of the least nasty stereotypes. In Lviv, journalist Michael Goldfarb of The Guardian claims to have perceived “the darkness in people's souls.” Poland was his target: it was, he wrote, “the centre of the Holocaust”, yet he failed to mention the responsibility of the Nazi regime.

How to change that image in the Europe of today, being shaped by the Union? The answer lies in the hands of the “Polish plumbers” and “easy Ukrainian women”.

http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/article/2344591-between-east-and-west-gulf-stereotypes



Govt set to dissolve 64 provincial governments

Cabinet 'saves' 43 authorities

20 July, 13:19
(ANSA) - Rome, July 20 - The government is set to dissolve 64 of Italy's 107 provincial governments, assigning their functions to regional authorities as part of efforts by Premier Mario Monti's administration to save public money.

The Cabinet on Friday decided to 'save' 43 provincial authories, including 10 in the areas surrounding big Italian cities, government sources said.


__._,_.__