Côte d’Azur hideaway. Public money spent at Hermès, Monblanc, Euronics and Unieuro stores
Checks of the accounts reveal that Mr Fiorito paid himself councillors’ allowances three times every month. During questioning, assistant public prosecutor Alberto Caperna and deputy prosecutor Alberto Pioletti quizzed him about this procedure. Mr Fiorito replied candidly: “The reason for the bank transfers I ordered from the party group account to my accounts lie in the decision by the group to assign to me a double allowance, in addition to the allowance I already received. I would point out that I assigned myself a monthly allowance of €4,190 for my position as councillor and €8,380 (double) for my positions as committee chair and group leader. The ‘triple allowance’ was not approved by the council group. It has always been standard practice in the PDL group and in the other groups”. This assertion is denied by six witnesses, the most important of whom is Mario Abbruzzese, chair of the municipal council, but it is also refuted by the heads of secretariat of the Christian Democrat UDC group and the Lista Polverini, as well as two officers.
But Mr Fiorito has to answer for more than just double or triple allowances. The real problem is the uncontrolled spending exposed by financial police experts. As magistrate Stefano Aprile points out, the expenses “have no connection with the activities of the PDL group”. The list of credit card payments reveals €1,331 spent at a Unieuro store, €263.87 at an Auchan supermarket, €500 for a Montblanc pen and €1,010 paid to Hermès. When asked by public prosecutors to justify the expenses, Mr Fiorito replied: “I can only tell you about the expenses incurred at Ceramiche Appia Nuova and Sonnino Tessuti, which appear to refer to the purchase of, in the first case, bathroom accessories for the party premises at Anagni and Frosinone and, in the second, to curtain material for the same premises”. The magistrate notes: “It can be ruled out that the local branch of a political party falls within the scope of the council group’s institutional aims and neither is it appropriate to linger over the examination of purchases at well-known boutiques in central Rome, unless one wishes to assert that clothing and designer pens fall within the ambit of the assembly group’s function”.
One of the reasons that prompted the magistrate to issue an arrest warrant was tampering with the evidence. The allegation is supported by the service report of the financial police officers who on 14 September carried out the search at Mr Fiorito’s home. Mr Fiorito appeared not to be at the address where he is registered as resident. He was contacted by phone and assured officers he would be at the Parioli district flat where he habitually resides “in twenty minutes”. Officers called again when he did not turn up. He then said he was already in the flat, having entered through the adjacent building. Officers rushed in but could find little in the way of documents. Mr Fiorito himself handed over the folders of invoices five days later, when he was questioned. He told investigators: “Some of the folders were normally kept at the office of Boschi or Galassi [the secretaries - Ed.] and some in the dressing room behind my office. They weren’t found during the search because earlier I had taken them to another flat to stop them falling into the hands of my successor as group leader, Francesco Battistoni”.