EUROPE: Getting rid of Jews -- and -- The Jewish Vote
Europian antisemitism: "Judenrein"?
In a few weeks Norway will be"Judenrein" (Free of Jews).
The last 819 Jews still living in Norway are now leaving the country due to the rise in anti-Semitism. Thus Norway becomes the first European country in which Jews will no longer live.
THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE IS AWARDED IN NORWAY
A similar development can be observed in all the European countries. When one hears nowadays reports regarding the terrorist attack against Jews in Bulgaria one does not know that Jews in Europe are subject to anti-Semitic manifestations daily. The Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten reported In February 2012 about the departure of Jews from the country. Anne Sender, the head of the Jewish community in Norway , once said: "Many immigrants brought anti-Semitism from their countries. The shame is in that nobody speaks out against them." The waves of Muslim immigrants bring anti-Semitism back to Europe . A similar development is taking place in the neighbouring country, Sweden , and in all the European countries. The Muslims are the ones who drive away the Jews everywhere. The information agency, Kopp Exklusiv, is one of the few to talk about this subject. It started in France . A day doesn't go by without Muslim attacks of Jews. The press hardly reports it. There are too many incidents. In the first five months of 2012, there were 268 attacks against Jews. France today is an extremely anti-Semitic country. The socialist Government under the leadership of Hollande does nothing to protect the Jews - on the contrary. The numerous Muslims are a very important part of the electorate for the elected officials and they are under the auspices of the socialists. On July 5, 2012, a 17 years-old Jewish youngster was nearly beaten to death near Toulouse by two Muslims of North-African descent because he was wearing a chain with the Star of David. The police were unable to collect evidence. The Jews are publicly encouraged to leave the country. The situation is not much different in Italy . Every Jew must fear for his life and live under the protection of a security unit. The media channels in Britain too, have been reporting for six years about the emigration of Jews from Britain . In 1990 there were 340,000 Jews. Today there are 240,000 left. The Muslim immigrants turn their life into hell and chase them away. They have also succeeded in driving away the Jews of Jewish Antwerp. In the Netherlands , former politicians advised the Jews to leave the country soon. The former European Commissioner, Frits Bolkestein, said that Dutchmen of Moroccan descent are anti-Semitic and that it would be best if the Jews left of their free will. They can immigrate to the United States or to Israel . Dutch politicians from the Social Democratic circles marched together with the Muslims who called for the construction of gas chambers in order to burn the Jews. In the German-speaking countries this is not reported in the press. The German journalists think that the Muslims are decent people who have no connection whatsoever to the extreme right . With this approach, journalists are helping to drive the Jews away from Europe . They suppress the nightmare of the Islamic immigration.
The Mufti was Yasser Arafat's uncle!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The last 819 Jews still living in Norway are now leaving the country due to the rise in anti-Semitism. Thus Norway becomes the first European country in which Jews will no longer live.
THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE IS AWARDED IN NORWAY
A similar development can be observed in all the European countries. When one hears nowadays reports regarding the terrorist attack against Jews in Bulgaria one does not know that Jews in Europe are subject to anti-Semitic manifestations daily. The Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten reported In February 2012 about the departure of Jews from the country. Anne Sender, the head of the Jewish community in Norway , once said: "Many immigrants brought anti-Semitism from their countries. The shame is in that nobody speaks out against them." The waves of Muslim immigrants bring anti-Semitism back to Europe . A similar development is taking place in the neighbouring country, Sweden , and in all the European countries. The Muslims are the ones who drive away the Jews everywhere. The information agency, Kopp Exklusiv, is one of the few to talk about this subject. It started in France . A day doesn't go by without Muslim attacks of Jews. The press hardly reports it. There are too many incidents. In the first five months of 2012, there were 268 attacks against Jews. France today is an extremely anti-Semitic country. The socialist Government under the leadership of Hollande does nothing to protect the Jews - on the contrary. The numerous Muslims are a very important part of the electorate for the elected officials and they are under the auspices of the socialists. On July 5, 2012, a 17 years-old Jewish youngster was nearly beaten to death near Toulouse by two Muslims of North-African descent because he was wearing a chain with the Star of David. The police were unable to collect evidence. The Jews are publicly encouraged to leave the country. The situation is not much different in Italy . Every Jew must fear for his life and live under the protection of a security unit. The media channels in Britain too, have been reporting for six years about the emigration of Jews from Britain . In 1990 there were 340,000 Jews. Today there are 240,000 left. The Muslim immigrants turn their life into hell and chase them away. They have also succeeded in driving away the Jews of Jewish Antwerp. In the Netherlands , former politicians advised the Jews to leave the country soon. The former European Commissioner, Frits Bolkestein, said that Dutchmen of Moroccan descent are anti-Semitic and that it would be best if the Jews left of their free will. They can immigrate to the United States or to Israel . Dutch politicians from the Social Democratic circles marched together with the Muslims who called for the construction of gas chambers in order to burn the Jews. In the German-speaking countries this is not reported in the press. The German journalists think that the Muslims are decent people who have no connection whatsoever to the extreme right . With this approach, journalists are helping to drive the Jews away from Europe . They suppress the nightmare of the Islamic immigration.
The Mufti was Yasser Arafat's uncle!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why I’m switching to Romney this election
10/29/2012 22:22
I am a former chairperson of Democrats Abroad Israel, and was an official delegate to the 1992 National Democratic Convention. In all of my 80 years, I have never before voted for a Republican for president. But this time around, I am not only proudly voting for Mitt Romney, but feel compelled to encourage others to do the same.
I grew up in a Reform Jewish family in Missouri, and came of age politically as a proud Democrat due to the inspiration of my native-son president, Harry Truman. I have been involved in Democratic Party politics for many years in both America and Israel, including serving as vice chairperson of the Franklin County Democratic Central Committee in Missouri.
It is precisely because of my belief in the longtime ideals of the Democratic Party that I feel the responsibility to speak out now.
READ THE REST HERE:
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?id=289733
THE JEWISH VOTE
We'll do anything to get the Jewish Vote
Jews tend to move to states with a high number of electoral votes: The top four states with the largest Jewish populations account for 127 electoral votes; the top 10 states with the largest Jewish populations account for 244 electoral votes. However, most of them cast their ballots in places where there will be no real competition between Obama and Romney. Four states have a Jewish population that accounts for more than half of all American Jews: New York, California, Florida and New Jersey. Eight states have a population of close to a quarter of a million Jews: New York, California, Florida, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Maryland. In New York, Jews make up about 8% of the population. In New Jersey it is 5-6%. In Maryland and Massachusetts the percentage of Jews is also greater than 4%.
Or take Florida, the most talked-about state of possible Jewish consequence, a state in which the Jews were allegedly responsible for a month-long lock on the presidential pick, following the 2000 elections, a state where Joe Lieberman was able to bring Al Gore very close to winning, thanks to, among others, Jewish voters. Florida has been for a number of years now the ground zero of American Jewish politics – from Lieberman of 2000 to the Sarah Silverman video supporting Obama of 2008.
The Lieberman Factor
Read the Rest Here:
Excerpted from "The Jewish Vote: Obama vs. Romney: A Voter’s Guide," a non-partisan look at voting trends in the American Jewish community.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.israelvideonetwork.com/i-am-israel
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THE PATIENT COMMITS SUICIDE.
THAN THE PSYCHIATRIST COMMITS SUICIDE.
DANGER: THE READER OF THIS MAY COMMIT SUICIDE.
Goering’s appreciation was enormous, and he offered Dr. Kelley one of his colossal rings in recompense. According to Kelley’s son, Douglas Kelley, Jr., the psychiatrist replied, “No, you’re a prisoner—you can’t give that to me.” So Goering responded, “Then I’ll give you something even better and more valuable, a signed photograph.” That framed portrait of a proud Goering in full military regalia, autographed and inscribed in the Reich Marshal’s sinuous script with fading ink, remains among the senior Kelley’s papers.
Hermann Goering Psychiatric Evaluation Made Public After 65 Years
PROGNOSIS - "NORMAL"
Douglas M. Kelley was given an unusual assignment for any psychiatrist, one in which he had to balance his role as an employee of the US government and a doctor to the top Nazi war criminal in custody. He spent months interviewing and evaluating Goering, developing a detailed picture of his personality and what drove him in his personal and professional life. For 65 years, Kelley’s family had kept the papers pertaining to the Goering evaluation under wraps. Like the infamous man he treated and evaluated, Kelley bit down on a cyanide capsule in what many believe was a drunken suicidal gesture that went horribly awry. This horrifying moment ended Kelley’s short life in 1958. Undoubtedly it took great courage for his family to reopen a book that had been closed for over 50 years.
Scientific American published an article by Jack El Hai, based on a detailed examination of Dr. Kelley’s contact with Hermann Goering. Contrary to popular conceptions prevalent at the time, he found Goering to be clinically normal
Scientific American published an article by Jack El Hai, based on a detailed examination of Dr. Kelley’s contact with Hermann Goering. Contrary to popular conceptions prevalent at the time, he found Goering to be clinically normal
Scientific American article on Douglas Kelley and Hermann Goering (short version) Sphere: Related Content
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THE NAQBA - THE FALSE PALESTINIAN NARRATIVE
Like a magician's hands, watch the hand not moving.
If you can't make history, just change it!
If you can't win a war on the battlefield, try to win it at Turtle Bay.
The Palestinian Arab Narrative
WHAT YOU SEE ABOVE WAS NEVER, PALESTINE!
THE FACTS, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE TRUTH, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS HISTORY
THE MANDATE - PALESTINE BEFORE THE PARTITION
Palestine (the Palestinian Territories) above is NOT, what the Arabs depict on the first map, which is Israel.
Israel is not Palestine and never was Palestine.
The Palestinian Territories (not a country, but an area) include BOTH what is Israel and the West Bank (mandated for Palestinian Jews)...
...and Trans-Jordan (aka Jordan) for Palestinian Arabs - second map.
Both Jordan and Israel were created at the same time. Israel was simply re-established as a state, a small part of its ancient territories.
Jordan was a newly-created state that never has existed in history.
THE MANDATE DIVIDED THE TERRITORIES FOR PALESTINIAN JEWS 23% AND PALESTINIAN ARABS 77%.
The WEST BANK (correct name Judea and Samaria) is ISRAEL proper. It is not OCCUPIED TERRITORIES as the Arabs would have it, but as all documents pertaining thereto has it, DISPUTED TERRITORIES.
Why is the West Bank Israel proper and not Jordan proper? Because the Mandate specified Israeli territory as WEST of the JORDAN River. That's why. East of the Jordan is Arab territory.
And that is why it is disputed, because subsequent to all international agreements, after the fact it became disputed because of the demographics. It became disputed after the birth of "The Palestinian," an invention after 1964.
That is what Israeli settlements, the third map, is trying to change. To recover territories lost due to the migration of Arabs into the territories for JOBS created by the Jews. The TWO STATE SOLUTION is a solution of creating a SECOND Palestinian Arab State on the territories mandated by the international community, League of Nations, San Remo Conferenc,e and the United Nations, on specifically Jewish Land.
In 1948 Jordan having invaded the West Bank and Jerusalem, annexed both areas, and evicted all the Jews - otherwise known as an ETHNIC CLEANSING operation.
In 1967 Israel invaded the territories formerly held by Jordan illegally, and took the land back.
2000 years ago the Romans invaded Israel (a land that they called Palestine), and removed a large number of Jews to Rome as slaves. A great many Jews hid out in the desert around Masada and elsewhere and never left Israel. The Romans did and left the land mostly barren, a land that was mostly inhabited (it was mostly rubble and vacant) until the Zionists returned at the end of the 19th century. After the Zionists arrived, there were waves of Arab migration from Jordan and Syria for jobs to build the new Jewish state. They are the Palestinian Arabs who live in cinder block constructed homes, attesting to their recent vintage. They are squatters from another land. After the Romans invaded, others invaded and took the land from the Romans, the Malamukes, Byzantines, Ottomans, and finally, the Brits who administered the MANDATE.Each succeeding invasion STOLE the land from the invasion before. The Jews threw the Brits out and STOLE back their own land. Most poets would call it all Poetic Justice.
The Palestinian narrative, THE NAQBA, about the displaced refugees is therefore put into context. It is not that the Jews STOLE Arab land, but actually the reverse, the Arabs STOLE Jewish land and the West Bank is the EVIDENCE of that theft. Under every rock in the West Bank you can find ancient Hebraic artifacts. Under no rock can you find an Arab Palestinian artifact for one reason: No such thing has ever existed.
One million Jews were expelled from Arab lands in North Africa and the Gulf. They were all resettled in Israel. Israel consists of 6/10th of 1% of the area. If Israel can resettle its Jews on 6/10th of one percent, the Arabs could resettle their Arab brothers. If they don't want to, too bad. Israel is not the land these Arabs will resettle. Ever.
Jewish nakba-the Jewish forced exile from Arab countries - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSOa1u2pW1AThese Jews were never compensated for their estimated $300 billion loss. NOTE: Right of RETURN!
THEY WERE SIMPLY FORGOTTEN!
Now ask yourself why all the so-called HUMAN RIGHTS organizations only speak of Arab Palestinian refugees and never about the Jewish refugees who had outnumbered the Arabs?
I get it. The Jews, maybe, are not human?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why I am proud to be an ‘Israel Firster’
03/18/2012 22:04
Among others, liberal poster child and at times valiant Israel defender Alan Dershowitz recently strongly objected to the use of the term “Israel Firster,” applied notably by M.J. Rosenberg, an employee of President-Obama-affiliated watchdog Media Matters.
Fox News pointed out that the term “Israel Firster” is an “epithet that implies somebody’s loyalties are to Israel before America.” As Dershowitz explained in an interview with the news station, “When you accuse Jews of dual loyalty, you invoke a canard that goes back hundreds of years and falls into the category of anti-Semitism.” The inherent problem with the objection to the use of the term is that in order to accept its “negative connotation,” one first has to accept the false premise that American and Israeli interests are fundamentally at odds.
Yes, of course Israel and the United States won’t agree on all the details, but these are only policy differences, in the same way as Americans among themselves will disagree. As a whole, Americans overwhelmingly agree that support for Israel is in America’s interests, and Israel’s and America’s global objectives are about as perfectly aligned as possible with any other sovereign nation.
A March 2nd 2012 Gallup poll showed that 71 percent of Americans view Israel favorably, as opposed to 19% for the Palestinian Authority. For the sake of reference, this figure is higher than the favorability rating of both the president and congress combined. In 2010 another Gallup poll showed Israel to be the fifth favorite foreign country for Americans, following Canada, Germany, Great Britain and Japan.
Ratings like this are not the result of some collective charitable complex that has been sweeping the nation since the birth of polling on this subject, nor could they possibly be the result of some sophisticated marketing campaign. Quite simply, public opinion is formed by a collective perception of interests and allegiances, and America recognizes that Israel essentially serves as its Middle East beachhead. If Israel were to fall, the United States and the free world would be significantly weakened, and its interests in the region would be in dire jeopardy.
CONSIDER FOR a moment a world without Israel. Once the “small satan” is gone, the enemies of freedom in the Middle East would increasingly shift focus towards the “big satan” and its interests, starting with Saudi Arabia. Producing almost 10 million barrels of oil daily, more than double Iran’s output, the impact of instability in Saudi Arabia on oil prices and Western economies would be unimaginable.
On the rare occasion that American administrations have taken significant anti-Israel positions, it has been against the will of the American people.
An Associated Press article published last week indicated that President Obama himself had acknowledged as much.
The article cites the Palestinian foreign minister Riad Malki saying that “Obama has told the Palestinians to sit tight during a US election year, while holding out the promise of a serious push for Palestinian statehood if he wins a second term,” Adding that the reason is “because the president will be focusing on how to be re-elected.”
Now, if the kind of “serious pushing” that the Obama administration has been engaged in before the “re-election” concern came to the fore was in accordance with the will, interests and priorities of the American people, he would be upping the tempo during election year, and not sitting out the round.
M.J Rosenberg wrote, “There is no need here to describe who the Israel Firsters are. They are those people (of whatever ethnic background) who invariably support Israel’s policies over those of the United States.” His premise is false. Those who support Israel’s policies believe that they conform to the interests of the United States, and in America they are the vast majority.
In truth, the term “Israel Firster” is almost tantamount to accusing a supporter of America’s military as being a “Troops Firster.” It is Rosenberg and his academic cohorts like Walt and Mearsheimer that have been working so diligently to undermine the dovetailing of the United States and Israel’s foreign interests by injecting their “Liberal Firster” agenda. As such the “Israel Firster” term should be proclaimed as a badge of honor by those who refuse to accept their dishonest narrative.
The writer is the director of the Algemeiner Journal and the GJCF and can be emailed at defune@gjcf.com. Please visit www.algemeiner.com for more information.
Fox News pointed out that the term “Israel Firster” is an “epithet that implies somebody’s loyalties are to Israel before America.” As Dershowitz explained in an interview with the news station, “When you accuse Jews of dual loyalty, you invoke a canard that goes back hundreds of years and falls into the category of anti-Semitism.” The inherent problem with the objection to the use of the term is that in order to accept its “negative connotation,” one first has to accept the false premise that American and Israeli interests are fundamentally at odds.
Yes, of course Israel and the United States won’t agree on all the details, but these are only policy differences, in the same way as Americans among themselves will disagree. As a whole, Americans overwhelmingly agree that support for Israel is in America’s interests, and Israel’s and America’s global objectives are about as perfectly aligned as possible with any other sovereign nation.
A March 2nd 2012 Gallup poll showed that 71 percent of Americans view Israel favorably, as opposed to 19% for the Palestinian Authority. For the sake of reference, this figure is higher than the favorability rating of both the president and congress combined. In 2010 another Gallup poll showed Israel to be the fifth favorite foreign country for Americans, following Canada, Germany, Great Britain and Japan.
Ratings like this are not the result of some collective charitable complex that has been sweeping the nation since the birth of polling on this subject, nor could they possibly be the result of some sophisticated marketing campaign. Quite simply, public opinion is formed by a collective perception of interests and allegiances, and America recognizes that Israel essentially serves as its Middle East beachhead. If Israel were to fall, the United States and the free world would be significantly weakened, and its interests in the region would be in dire jeopardy.
CONSIDER FOR a moment a world without Israel. Once the “small satan” is gone, the enemies of freedom in the Middle East would increasingly shift focus towards the “big satan” and its interests, starting with Saudi Arabia. Producing almost 10 million barrels of oil daily, more than double Iran’s output, the impact of instability in Saudi Arabia on oil prices and Western economies would be unimaginable.
On the rare occasion that American administrations have taken significant anti-Israel positions, it has been against the will of the American people.
An Associated Press article published last week indicated that President Obama himself had acknowledged as much.
The article cites the Palestinian foreign minister Riad Malki saying that “Obama has told the Palestinians to sit tight during a US election year, while holding out the promise of a serious push for Palestinian statehood if he wins a second term,” Adding that the reason is “because the president will be focusing on how to be re-elected.”
Now, if the kind of “serious pushing” that the Obama administration has been engaged in before the “re-election” concern came to the fore was in accordance with the will, interests and priorities of the American people, he would be upping the tempo during election year, and not sitting out the round.
M.J Rosenberg wrote, “There is no need here to describe who the Israel Firsters are. They are those people (of whatever ethnic background) who invariably support Israel’s policies over those of the United States.” His premise is false. Those who support Israel’s policies believe that they conform to the interests of the United States, and in America they are the vast majority.
In truth, the term “Israel Firster” is almost tantamount to accusing a supporter of America’s military as being a “Troops Firster.” It is Rosenberg and his academic cohorts like Walt and Mearsheimer that have been working so diligently to undermine the dovetailing of the United States and Israel’s foreign interests by injecting their “Liberal Firster” agenda. As such the “Israel Firster” term should be proclaimed as a badge of honor by those who refuse to accept their dishonest narrative.
The writer is the director of the Algemeiner Journal and the GJCF and can be emailed at defune@gjcf.com. Please visit www.algemeiner.com for more information.
DoD MEMO #50430
Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman
Views Askew - a Newsletter
Mythbusting for those who demand more than a Headline
But less than a Novel. To restore the GOOD in Civilization...andDeconstructing anti-American and anti-Israel Propaganda.
“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.” - JFK, Cold Warrior, Neo-Con
Posts
