Video: Pamela Geller vs. Jim Wallis (the Marxist)
In this exchange between Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs and Barack Obama spiritual adviser, Jim Wallis (a marxist), the topic of discussion is the ads Geller was cleared to put up in the New York subway system by a recent court ruling. Note how Wallis seems to channel his inner Feisal Abdul Rauf, preaching tolerance and bridge building while maintaining a soothing voice that should have been accompanied by elevator music.
Wallis actually employs a tactic common to stealth jihadists here. He talks about holding conferences and meetings with representatives of all faiths – Islam, Christianity, and Judaism – to reach mutual understandings. This is a ruse. Period. Islamists (and apparently marxists like Wallis) love these little pow-wows and the useful dupes who attend them. They provide air cover for the Islamists’ true intentions.
Rabbi David Saperstein is a primary example. You can read more about his interference-running here. He has stood shoulder to shoulder with Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) president Mohamed Magid on more than one occasion.
All you really need to know before watching this clip is that Jim Wallis is a marxist and marxists lie.
One other thing to watch for. Toward the end, you hear Wallis tell Geller to ‘stop talking’. He says it more than once and Geller calls him on it. Ain’t it funny how leftists want people to stop talking and we on the right want leftists to keep ON talking?
Via Atlas Shrugs:
As for Wallis, the calm, caring man you see portrayed in the aforementioned video is belied by his ideology. Here is Glenn Beck in 2010, exposing Wallis as a Marxist:
As for references to the poor in the Bible, we wonder if Mr. Wallis ripped outJohn 12: 1-6, which implicates Judas Iscariot as a Socialist and a Marxist:
Then Jesus six days before the passover came to Bethany, where Lazarus was, which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead.2 There they made him a supper; and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him.3 Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment.4 Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, which should betray him,5 Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.
If spreading the wealth around is good for everybody, what does one call it when wealth is taken in the name of spreading it around but, in actuality, it’s hoarded by those holding the money bag?
Smells like Marxism, eh, Mr. Wallis?
Posts
