The “Succession to the Crown Bill”, has already been put to Members of the Commonwealth for which Her Majesty is Head of. It is now being debated in both Houses of Parliament.
I therefore suggest, that as this Government proposes changes to the people’s foundational Bill of Rights 1689, that the people of this United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland must be informed, and especially because of the many proposed changes to the people’s long standing Common law Constitution. The Bill of Rights in particular is indeed the people’s Bill of Rights and there are two codiciles at the end of the Bill that make very clear indeed that no alterations to that Bill may be permitted, for the Bill is for all time. Clearly the Bill of Rights 1689 may not be alterred at all.
The title of the Bill is ‘Succession to the Crown Bill’ yet there is absolutely no need for any changes to our Constitution at this moment in time for there are two other people in line to the Throne and the next in line has not even been born yet, and of course it might even be a boy anyway. How many times have the people been told that we have no Constitution? Now that we are told we have, it becomes clear that acceptance of all or any EC/EEC/EU Treaty is absolutely contrary to our long standing Common law Constitution. Never once for 600 years has there been proposed such vast changes to our Constitution as there is now.
These changes include The Bill of Rights 1689, the Act of Settlement, the Union with Scotland Act 1706, the Coronation Oath Act 1688, the Princess Sophia’s Precedence Act 1711, the Royal Marriages Act 1772, the Union with Ireland Act 1800, the Accession Declaration Act 1910 and the Regency Act 1937. All this allegedly because of the Act of Succession and alleged discrimination re those that have accepted with grace the ancient Common Law Constitution. I add to this that the people of this Country have born the burden of two World Wars to protect our constitution and way of life. The last war in living memory.
It is also noted that these changes are, or would be in keeping with the EU’s “Equality Act”. Is that then the real Reason for these changes? Her Majesty has put her Prerogative in the hands of the Government and on further rereading of Her Majesty’s Coronation Oath it seems very doubtful indeed that these proposed changes are in keeping with Her Majesty’s Coronation Oath. Even all of those in that wonderful building cannot possibly lawfully change the proposed nine parts of our Constitution that so many gave their lives for in the protecting of our way of life through our Constitution. Our sworn Allegiance to the Crown forbids these proposed changes plus also remembering those that went through the last war, now recognise the great betrayal of all those that gave their lives for our freedom.
What is proposed in this Bill is asking Her Majesty that she should forgo Her Coronation Oath and/or by altering and perhaps having to agree to something that was put into the laws of this land for ever and “forever” means it is incapable of being changed. The same applies to much of our long standing Constitution. We have indeed had two Queen Elizabeth’s, and one Queen Mary, the proposals seem to me our Constitution has been ignored because of the EU Treaties ratified in the past, but here, the deliberate changes to our very own long standing Common Law Constitution is a great massive step too far and betrays all those that gave their lives in war so that we here in the United Kingdom could be free forever from Foreign Rule.
There is no doubt what-so-ever, that these changes are indeed in keeping with the EU’s Equality Act, yet many like me suffered in the last war-being bombed out twice and my husband having fought in that war along side many of his friends that never came back. It is time to get out of the EU, and I gently remind all, that the Treason laws are there for all time to protect our Constitution and although two Treason Laws were allegedly ‘repealed in full’ instead of just the “death by hanging” clause in the Government’s “Crime and Disorder Act”, and recorded as so repealed, they are indeed ‘live’ because they are there for all time to protect our Constitution and cannot therefore be repealed.
Reading through the Queen’s Coronation Oaths that Her Majesty solemnly made that great day, I can understand why Her Majesty cannot possible agree to any of these proposed changes to the ‘Succession to the Crown Bill’. As all elected Members of Parliament also have to make their sworn solemn Oaths of Allegiance to the British Crown on top of the solemn Oath of Allegiance as British born citizens, required before they may put themselves forward as Members of the British Parliament, neither can they or any British subject of the Queen agree to any alterations of their long standing Common Law Constitution.I am particularly aware the Government alone cannot change the Oath of Allegiance, for that would be contrary to the Oaths of Allegiance they make themselves. Even as MP’s step forward in the House of Commons to place their hand on the Bible and swear the Oath, that Oath ends with the words , "ACCORDING TO LAW". This is the Executive ECHOINGthe Queen's own Coronation Oath. There are TWO OATHS operative here, to protect the nation and the people. The Queen's Oath, and the Oath of her Executive to her. They are interlocking oaths to respect the RULE OF LAW at all times.
Also made clear is that the use of the Prerogative Power may not be subversive of the rights and liberties of the subject. (See case of Nichols v Nicholes, “Prerogative is created for the benefit of the people and cannot be exercised to their prejudice”) The Bill of Rights 1689 is a declaration of Common law. It is also an operative statute and it contains the Oath of Allegiance, which is required by Magna Carta to be taken by all Crown servants including members of the Armed Forces, MP's and the Judiciary. They are required also to "take into consequence anything to the detriment of the subjects liberties”. The Monarch is constitutionally bound to respect the Common Laws, which are recognised in Magna Carta and declared in the Bill of Rights and so bound by Her Majesty's Coronation Oath. The Royal Prerogatives of the Crown and Parliament were set by common law and cannot be lawfully infringed by them. Each British Subject from the moment they are born here in the UK is bound by an Oath of Allegiance to the Crown just as if that person has declared so out loud.
However, I will take this a little further, for many changes are indeed being made by this Coalition Government, so much so, that one feels that the death of our complete Constitution in this Country cannot come quick enough for any one of them. Just suppose that if a European Union still exists by the time William and Kate’s baby is ready for marriage, what if He/She chooses “same sex Marriage” (See the EU’s Equality Act) End of future Monarchy? Or should provisions be made now to protect the line? As I understand it however, “Only a natural-born child of a husband and wife can succeed to the Throne". Yet how can that be if we allow Same-Sex marriage apply to our Monarchy?
Should it be laid down in Law while the Succession to the Crown Bill is going through Parliament? Perhaps it should be the second son or daughter that should become the next Monarch? Sadly, it seems that our present leaders can only see the “TODAY” in what the proposed changes to the Succession to the Crown Bill may bring-they are not looking into the future of this Country-unless I am missing some-thing and there is no “future” for this Country and we will indeed just be REGIONS of the European Union-forever in the one Federal State of European Union? The thought comes to me, would anyone in the EU, TRUST any Government and/or any Parliament that have paid billions to “give” the Governing of their own Country’s away to foreigners-that may well be FOREVER-and doing so deceitfully? Fooling the people that elected them and trusted them?
I am aware the Government alone cannot change the Oath of Allegiance, for that would be contrary to the Oaths of Allegiance they make themselves. In fact all MP’s and Members of Government so swear allegiance to the British Crown before they may take up their seats in parliament even though the people have freely elected them.
Perhaps we should remember too that our entry into what we were told was, “A Common Market” was based on a deliberate lie by one Edward Heath who assured the people that in joining this Common Market, “There would be no loss of essential Sovereignty”. That lie was admitted on Television many years later. Could we hold a referendum on whether to remain in the EU, as promised by Mr Cameron IF he wins the 2015 General Election? He knows from the Oath he made when he became Prime Minister that, our Constitution is not negotiable. Does he really think the people could choose to be governed by foreigners forever, knowing that so many died for our freedom?Overthrowing our Constitution by choosing to remain in the EU would indeed be treason. Even conspiring to or contemplating overthrowing our Constitution is treason as is encouraging others to overthrow our Constitution-even through a referendum, would indeed be treason.
Therefore no part of what is proposed in the "Succession to the Crown Bill" can go against anything Her Majesty so solemnly swore on Oath by Her Majesty on that very special Coronation Day. Other words changed/altered now do not allow any alteration to what Her Majesty so swore on that day which ended with-“according to their respective laws and customs” and “Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and Government thereof, as by law established in England? It is the duty of every Subject to uphold the strong and firm solemn Oath of Allegiance to the British Crown which embraces our very long standing Common law Constitution. Our Queen answered, “All this I promise to do”. Perhaps we should all make clear that we too will also answer, “All this we also promise to do”.
A P. 18.3.2013.
Posts
