Pacifism is objectively pro-Fascist.
This is elementary common sense.
If you hamper the war effort of one side,
you automatically help out that of the other.
(George Orwell, Partisan
Review, 1942)
========================
Shocking Revelations
Prof. Paul Eidelberg
In my previous article I pointed out that anyone who supports the establishment of a Palestinian state must be a left-wing anti-Semite. Surely this does not apply to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu even though he has endorsed the creation of such a state in the Land of Israel.
We are thus confronted by a logical and embarrassing dilemma. Strange as it may seem, no less than Ariel Sharon was confronted by this dilemma almost twenty ago. Let me explain, but be prepared for some shocking revelations.
Before Sharon suffered his crippling stroke in 2006, some people wondered about his mental stability. How was it possible that a Zionist and a heroic personality like Ariel Sharon could adopt Labor’s post-Zionist and defeatist policy of unilateral disengagement from Gaza?[1] Sharon’s long-time friend MK Reuven Rivlin said at the time that Sharon “has lost his mind.”
To clarify Rivlin’s bleak remark about Sharon and simultaneously substantiate my bleak assessment of Mr. Netanyahu, allow me to recur to an article I wrote before Sharon’s stroke.
1. Sharon knew as well as anyone that withdrawal from Gaza had no strategic justification. In fact, six months before the August 2005 withdrawal (as we shall spell out below), Israel’s highest defense and intelligence officials testified against withdrawal.
2. To clinch my assessment of Sharon’s judgment, on June 12, 1992—i.e., fifteen months before Oslo, and while the Likud Party was campaigning against Labor’s policy of “territory for peace,” Sharon made the following statement in Ma’ariv: “If we cut and run, Gaza will be taken over by terror organizations....Gaza will be transformed into launching platforms of Katyushas....The only way to defeat terrorism is by controlling its bases.”
3. Fast forward to March 1995—hence, eighteen months afterOslo and ten years before the Gaza withdrawal. Yitzhak Rabin was then Prime Minister and Shimon Peres was his Defense Minster. Ariel Sharon made the following extraordinary statements in aJerusalem Post article dated March 31, 1995 entitled “The Enemy Within”:
· When I told the Knesset this week, ‘This government is against everything that is Jewish,’ several leftists were riled.But for me, the Jewish cause transcends everything. Israel is the Jewish state; Jerusalem is Jewish, and exclusively Jewish; Hebron is forever Jewish….
· Those on whose head lays the blood of the 134 Israeli citizens murdered since the Oslo Agreement are anti-Jewish….
· Anyone planning to hand over Beit El and Shiloh is against Jews and Judaism. Those who gave official status to non-Jews on the Temple Mount are anti-Jewish.
4. Notice that Sharon tacitly denounces Rabin and Peres as anti-Jewish. But virtually everything Sharon denounced as anti-Jewish applies ten-fold to himself, i.e., to his Gaza Disengagement Plan (hence to any Israeli that advocates a Palestinian state).
5. In the same Jerusalem Post article of March 31, 1995, Sharon warned that the Rabin Government’s plan to evacuate Gaza and parts of Judea and Samaria would result in Jewish bloodshed: “Evacuating the IDF from Palestinian-populated areas,” he said, “will primarily affect the Jewish population in Jerusalem and the center of the country.” These areas, he explained, “aren’t geared to defend themselves against terrorism.” He further warned, “Those who leave Jenin will find they have intensified terror … And those who dare to evacuate the IDF from Ramallah and Bethlehem shouldn’t expect a day of tranquility in Jerusalem.” Sharon thus foretold exactly what was to happen in Jerusalem and in the center of the country under his own government (which tolerated the murder of more than 1,000 Jews)!
6. Nothing has happened since 1995 to change Sharon’s ominous security assessment. Recall the January 2003 elections, when Sharon and his Likud Party campaigned against Labor’s disengagement policy. Throughout the next two years, IDF Chief of General Staff. Lt. Gen. Moshe Ya’alon, IDF Chief of Intelligence, Maj. Gen. Aharon Ze’evi-Farkash, and Shin Bet Director, Avi Dichter, testified before the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that withdrawal from Gaza and northern Samaria would increase terrorist attacks against Israel.[2]
7. The evidence of these and other experts who span the political spectrum clearly indicates that Sharon’s Disengagement Plan was not based on any rational, strategic considerations. In fact,former Deputy IDF Intelligence Chief, Maj. Gen. Yaakov Amidror declared that “The Israeli government has not succeeded in producing a single serious argument that can refute objections [to the abandonment of Gaza] and justify the grave step that it is taking”[3]
8. Given the warnings of these experts concerning Gaza, imagine what they would say about the abandonment of Judea and Samaria to make room for Benjamin Netanyahu’s Palestinian state?
9. Moreover, if Sharon could say that “Anyone planning to hand over Beit El and Shiloh is against Jews and Judaism,” what is one to say about Netanyahu?
NOTES:
[1] For a related study, see Paul Eidelberg, “A Machiavellian Analysis of Ariel Sharon,” Nativ: A Journal of Politics and the Arts(September, 2004).
[2] In his testimony before the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on January 5, 2005, Dichter described some threats inherent in carrying out Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s plan to pull the IDF out of the Gaza Strip. “In a situation where Israel is not in control of the Philadelphi corridor [which separates Gaza from the Sinai Peninsula],” Dichter warned, “terrorists arriving from Lebanon are liable to infiltrate through it into the Gaza Strip and there is the distinct possibility that in a short while the Gaza Strip will turn into south Lebanon.” Dichter also cautioned that the current “trickle” of arms smuggling through the corridor is liable to turn into a “river.” According to Dichter, during the six months following the cabinet approval of the disengagement plan in June 2004, the number of Kassam rockets fired from Gaza nearly doubled. For a more detailed report, see The Jerusalem Post, January 6, 2005, pp. 3, 9.
[3] Yaakov Amidror, “Unilateral Withdrawal: A Security Error of Historical Magnitude,” Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, Tel Aviv University, Vol. 7, No. 3, December 2004.
Posts
