Thursday, 22 August 2013

IsraPundit


Obama Sides With Jihadists  

Laura:  Obama never threatened to withhold aid to Egypt when the mb was in power. He sold them F-16′s. Now that the jihad terror group has been rightfully ousted from power, Obama cuts off aid. Obama has clearly revealed himself to be on the side of the jihadists at every turn. Through his henchman lurch Kerry, he has also threatened Israel with a delegitimization campaign on “steroids” if it refused demands to surrender its territory to the genocidal PA. No delegitimization campaign against the savage jihadists of the mb and PA however. This man has consistently taken the side of evil.
Whose Side Is Obama On?
August 19, 2013  By Daniel Greenfield
U.S. President Barack Obama walks out after speaking
about the violence in Egypt while at his rental vacation
home on the Massachusetts island of Martha's Vineyard in
ChilmarkObama interrupted a hard day of lazing around Martha’s Vineyard to denounce the “arbitrary arrests” of Muslim Brotherhood supporters and the “broad crackdown on Mr. Morsi’s associations and supporters” and then insisted “We don’t take sides with any particular party or political figure.”
It was quite a turn to take in a single speech, but he did have a full day of golfing to get in. (Read more…)

Obama’s Strange Love Affair with the Muslim Brotherhood  

It’s hard to fathom how or why our administration ever thought the Muslim Brotherhood saw democracy as other than a means to an end — and a particularly repellent one at that — in the first place.
It’s not as if the MB is subtle. They have proclaimed who they are since their founding by Hasan al Banna in 1928 and have not wavered in any significant way since in their global jihadist goals. They have also been unstinting in their massive misogyny, homophobia and rigid support of Shariah law über alles (quite literallyüber alles, since the Brotherhood were — virtually the last still unrepentant — allies of Hitler in WWII).
You know, liberal stuff. (Read more…)

Top US general: Syrian rebels wouldn’t back US interests  

Ruling out certain types of intervention, Martin Dempsey says striking Assad’s regime is easy, but splintered opposition groups won’t support Washington

By BRADLEY KLAPPER , TOI, August 21, 2013, 9:59 am  
Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, holds up a photo of a deployed American soldier
(photo credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite)
Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, holds up a photo of a deployed American soldier as he testifies before the Senate Armed Services Committee at his reappointment hearing, on Capitol Hill in Washington. July 18, 2013. (photo credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite)
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration is opposed to even limited US military intervention in Syria because it believes rebels fighting the Assad regime wouldn’t support American interests if they were to seize power right now, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote to a congressman in a letter obtained by The Associated Press. (Read more…)

Rebel forces report massive death toll after Syrian chemical attack  

Free Syrian Army says over 1,100 people killed, though others report lower numbers; assault comes as UN inspectors in area to probe for chemical arms use; regime denies reports

By AP and TIMES OF ISRAEL STAFF August 21, 2013, 9:34 am 
 


Ted Belman
Jerusalem, Israel