 | |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
|
Censoring the Internet: A Collection of Essential Links
Major International Transport Hub Censors Political Websites
Paul Joseph Watson
While media accuses China of blacklisting sensitive information, censorship is taking place right here at home.
MySpace Is The Trojan Horse Of Internet Censorship
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com
MySpace isn’t cool, it isn’t hip and it isn’t trendy. It represents a cyber trojan horse and the media elite’s last gasp effort to reclaim control of the Internet and sink it with a stranglehold of regulation, control and censorship.
MySpace Admits Censorship Of Prison Planet.com
Paul Joseph Watson
Moderator says anything containing URL of website is filtered out.
2012: The Year The Internet Ends
cret Plan To Kill Internet By 2012 Leaked?
Paul Joseph Watson
Some question if report that pay-per-view system to be introduced is a hoax, but wider march to regulate the web is documented.
AOL Time-Warner Censors Alex Jones Websites
Prison Planet
Nationwide blackout a clear attempt to shut down free speech or just an error?
Internet Censorship Clampdown Begins In One Month In Australia
The Medasite
A new wave of “restrictions” on mobile phone content, websites, chatrooms and message boards will be introduced in Australia by late January, 2008.
The Alex Jones Show, June 11, 2008: : Death of the Internet
.............................................
Google Censors Another 9/11 Documentary
Steve Watson
A spate of viewings prompts shut down of classic Alex Jones film.
Google Video Caught Censoring Loose Change?
Steve Watson
Online version of 9/11 film not featured in top 100 despite still having huge viewing figures.
Japan To Censor The Internet?
Infowars reporter arrested; Media blackout
Gather
Infowars reporter Matt Lepacek was led out of the spin room by Goffstown PD last night, at the behest of a Giuliani staffer who didn’t like the question he and his crew were asking of a spokesman.
Google Censorship - How It Works
Seth Finkelstein
This report describes the system by which results in the Google search engine are suppressed.
Yahoo 9/11 Internet Censorship
Google Censorship FAQ
Google Blogoscoped
The figure of censored sites might be somewhere between millions to hundreds of millions.
You Tube Censors Hugely Popular “Question Your Reality” Video
Prison Planet
After receiving over 50,000 views in a few hours and on its way to shoot to the top of the most viewed chart, You Tube brazenly pulled a popular video from their rankings system.
"Smart-Mob" Censorship at Google and YouTube
Marc Baber
Three days after I posted a college lecture on the Google-Video website, it disappeared. The lecture was about measuring “warmongering” as a psychological trait using surveys and statistics.
Alex Jones: Internet 2 Takeover
Federally Funded Researchers Want To Scrap The Internet
Steve Watson
Seeking further funding from Congress for "clean slate" projects.
The Internet is Dead, Long Live the Internet
Steve Watson
Total regulation rules are close at hand, a new internet will kill free speech and weed out anything deemed "inappropriate."
Pentagon Carpet Bombs the Opposition in Cyberspace
Kurt Nimmo
The Pentagon puts forward a DDoS scheme.
More Nanny State Attacks on Internet Freedom
Kurt Nimmo
A nanny state proposal would jack the cost of running a website or blog through the ceiling.
Internet Censorship UK
Dan Gilmour on how web censorship is affecting citizen media
Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It?
Paul Joseph Watson
Several developments that are coming to the fore indicate a noticeable advance towards a government regulated, taxed and controlled system that spells doomsday for the Internet as we know it.
Tolls could dot the Internet highway
Associated Press
On the Internet, the traffic cops are blind — they don’t look at the data they’re directing, and they don’t give preferential treatment.
|
Posts
August 5th, 2008 at 9:18 am
Well when this happens I will cancel the internet.I wonder how many thousands of people or business this will hurt.I can see a very damaging blow to our economy.
August 5th, 2008 at 9:02 am
What about mirrored type sleeper sites, I could build a basic site that could carry some of the news items from infowars verbatim so those that have been filtered out by there isp and/or govt could still access the information
August 5th, 2008 at 8:50 am
Ned Flanders……change that 99.9999% to 100%. Stop giving our criminal leadership ANY doubt. That small piece of doubt is what they have used to kill millions of civilians and thousands of soldiers in a never ending pre-emptive war based on known and admitted lies.
Q: “I seen the footage of the two “grey” planes (multiple angles) hit the towers on 9-11. What are you suggesting? That the media played some type of “pre-fabricated” footage of this event?
A: You’ve also seen the footage of the WMD’s presented by Colin Powell. You’ve also seen footage of ghosts. You’ve seen footage of a president being shot in Dallas. You’ve seen footage of the levee rebuilding in Katrina. Stop looking at the footage. I can show you millions of hours of footage of anything…..what does that prove? Nothing. I can test what was seen in the footage from an airliner crash. I never need the footage. But wait….every single speck of debris from ALL 4 crash sites was ordered destroyed or put under never-to-be-looked-at-or-verified lock and key. Which means you can never verify it other than what was shown on “footage”. Ned…Watch “September clues” for an introduction into what you are asking. At this stage we need to understand what the media lying REALLY represents. Just like our monetary system….the media is based on “trust”. When that trust is completely shattered….what happens then?
From Please:
Q: “There is independent film footage” Of course there is. Stop relying on footage and only look at verifiable evidence. Except for Rupert Murdoch’s camera shot of “live TV” all the footage came DAYS LATER after the detonations. Footage is about as useful as “testimony”. These were plane crashes not ghost footage. You can actually go to the site and test and look for body parts vs. the smell of a ghost. Look and analyze only evidence that can be verified.
Q: “it is hard enough to convince the people that elements of our govt. could be responsible, let alone that no planes physically hitting the building.” That’s an amazing statement. It’s like saying our government has lied to us 1 million times. But even remotely considering 1 million and 1 lies is completely unacceptable. What this lie does is completely destroy the media of the world. They were in on it and just as complicit as anyone in the Bush regime. (After you watch “September Clues’ online….keep in mind that 2 anchors in Network national news TV history have been hired on a Tuesday to start their careers when Monday was not a holiday on twice in 55 years. Those anchors are Aaron Brown and Paula Zahn. Both anchors were hired by CNN on the morning of Tuesday Sept 11th 2001 in NYC. Think about that when you are listening to them describe the “airplanes”). Ps…..I could care less about convincing anyone of anything. That is for YOU to decide. Like you said….people still don’t think our government was responsible at all even today. Verify to yourself first and let the world take care of itself.
August 5th, 2008 at 8:17 am
In summary from http://www.savetheinternet.com, the issue central to all of this is Net Neutrality. Grasp the concept, see who is at work to undermine it, and join together to stop this greed/censorship.
From: http://www.savetheinternet.com
What is Network Neutrality?
Network Neutrality — or “Net Neutrality” for short — is the guiding principle that preserves the free and open Internet.
Put simply, Net Neutrality means no discrimination. Net Neutrality prevents Internet providers from blocking, speeding up or slowing down Web content based on its source, ownership or destination.
Net Neutrality is the reason why the Internet has driven economic innovation, democratic participation, and free speech online. It protects the consumer’s right to use any equipment, content, application or service on a non-discriminatory basis without interference from the network provider. With Net Neutrality, the network’s only job is to move data — not choose which data to privilege with higher quality service.
Learn more in Net Neutrality 101.
Who wants to get rid of Net Neutrality?
The nation’s largest telephone and cable companies — including AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner — want to be Internet gatekeepers, deciding which Web sites go fast or slow and which won’t load at all.
They want to tax content providers to guarantee speedy delivery of their data. They want to discriminate in favor of their own search engines, Internet phone services, and streaming video — while slowing down or blocking their competitors.
These companies have a new vision for the Internet. Instead of an even playing field, they want to reserve express lanes for their own content and services — or those from big corporations that can afford the steep tolls — and leave the rest of us on a winding dirt road.
The big phone and cable companies are spending hundreds of millions of dollars lobbying Congress and the Federal Communications Commission to gut Net Neutrality, putting the future of the Internet at risk.
Is Net Neutrality a new regulation?
Absolutely not. Net Neutrality has been part of the Internet since its inception. Pioneers like Vinton Cerf and Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web, always intended the Internet to be a neutral network. And “non-discrimination” provisions like Net Neutrality have governed the nation’s communications networks since the 1930s.
But as a consequence of a 2005 decision by the Federal Communications Commission, Net Neutrality — the foundation of the free and open Internet — was put in jeopardy. Now cable and phone company lobbyists are pushing to block legislation that would reinstate Net Neutrality.
Writing Net Neutrality into law would preserve the freedoms we currently enjoy on the Internet. For all their talk about “deregulation,” the cable and telephone giants don’t want real competition. They want special rules written in their favor.
My comment: Go and see the entire site and also the rest of the FAQ. This trend is subtle. They will do what they think they can get away with. You are the customer, let them know what you think. I did.
August 5th, 2008 at 7:36 am
Regarding FEDupwithFEDS #18
I know that my posts were submitted because they appeared and were responded to before being removed.