--------
Jewish Democrats still unhappy with corrected party platform, which omits clauses on Hamas, refugees and borders. Complains one veteran activist:They did not reinsert language saying Israel
is our most reliable ally in the Middle East
By Haviv Rettig Gur
The Times of Israel September 7, 2012, 9:55 pm23http://www.timesofisrael.com/jewish-democrats-still-unhappy-with-corrected-party-platform/
Democrats who followed or attended their national convention in Charlotte
this week generally insist it was energizing, interesting, and reaffirmed
for many the argument against Mitt Romney and for Barack Obama.
But the platform debacle – which saw the party dropping mentions of
Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, the only instance of the word “God” and
several pro-Israel provisions from its platform, only to have to hurriedly
reinstate God and Jerusalem – won’t disappear so quickly from memory if
Jewish Democratic leaders have their way. Some have started to call for
blood.
The platform was handled “by children,” one Jewish leader in Charlotte who
asked to remain anonymous told The Times of Israel.
In the kind of scathing critique that reporters heard from multiple sources
this week, the longtime Jewish activist said, “The people responsible for
the platform did such a terrible job working on the wording because they did
not conduct an inclusive process with members of the [pro-Israel] community.
That’s what led to this problem, and those people should be held
responsible.”
What’s more, some pro-Israel activists are far from satisfied even with the
corrected language in the platform.
Said longtime Democrat and prominent law professor Alan Dershowitz: “I would
like to see the president make statements over the course of the coming
weeks which re-affirm what was said in the 2008 platform, not only with
regards to Jerusalem, but in regard to the borders, the refugees and with
regard to Hamas,” he said. Off-the-record, other Jewish Democratic insiders
echo the objections.
The 2008 platform had demanded “the isolation of Hamas until that
organization renounces terrorism and accepts other requirements of the peace
process,” insisted that “any settlement of the so-called ‘refugees’ question
in a final settlement make a future Palestinian state, not Israel, the
destination for Palestinian ‘refugees,’” and noted “that it’s not realistic
to expect [the] outcome of negotiations to be a full and complete return to
the armistice lines of 1949.”
The platform produced ahead of the convention “wasn’t anti-Israel,” said the
Jewish leader who spoke to The Times of Israel anonymously. “It wasn’t bad.
It’s just that [the drafters] are children on this, and there was no adult
supervision. They don’t understand that there has to be continuity of
language. They threw out the previous platform and wrote a new one from
scratch.”
That inexperience led the Democrats to the embarrassing primetime television
spectacle of attempting to forcibly restore language about God and Jerusalem
to the platform on Wednesday through a voice vote on the convention floor –
a measure that was loudly booed by some delegates in the half-empty hall.
The Jewish activist’s description of the original platform rewrite process
was confirmed by a Democratic official, David Harris of the National Jewish
Democratic Council, who said Wednesday, “The party platform is not held up
from the previous election. A fresh document was created.”
Harris did not himself criticize party officials for the foul-up, instead
preferring to add to the praise other Jewish Democrats had for Obama’s
decision to reopen the platform, even at the cost of negative media
coverage.
“I’d say it’s a pretty significant moment for any political party to reopen
a political document like this at the request of the President of the United
States,” said Harris.
The Jewish leader agreed. The platform crafters erred by “trying to align
[the platform’s language] with the White House’s policy. The White House’s
policy is no different than it was under Bush. But policy is different from
a platform. They’re not the same thing.”
“The president’s decision to reinsert some of the language,” said the
leader, “was a rebuke to those who did this.”
The word “rebuke” figured heavily in Democrats’ version of events by
Thursday.
Dershowitz suggested to Algemeiner on Thursday that the boos in the
convention hall on Wednesday came from “rogue elements” of the far left. He
said the vote on the forced reinsertion of language on God and Jerusalem
made him “frankly very happy… because I think it alerted everybody to the
fact that this group within the Democratic Party poses a tremendous danger
to the bipartisan support for Israel that has characterized American
politics since 1948.”
“We caught them, and the president rebuked them basically,” he added.
The Jewish leader who spoke with the Times of Israel, a man intimately
familiar with Democratic Party institutions, dismissed the boos from the
convention floor, saying they were “mostly about God” rather than Jerusalem.
“The people in the room that early in the day were from the far left of the
party. Some of them didn’t understand the process, because it wasn’t
previewed for them. So they didn’t like the process, and they were reacting
to inserting God” into the platform, he said.
Pressed, however, as to whether C-SPAN’s footage of Arab American activists
booing indicated that some convention delegates may, in fact, have been
angered by wording over Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, the Democratic leader
conceded, “There were some anti-Israel activists in the crowd who made a lot
of noise.”
As they pick up the pieces of the PR debacle, Jewish Democrats are pointing
fingers at two names especially: former Florida Congressman Robert Wexler
and Georgetown University professor and defense analyst Colin Kahl.
Wexler could not be reached for comment. Kahl did not return emails
requesting comment.
The platform changes don’t reflect “the views of Democrats,” said the Jewish
leader, or even of a minority as Dershowitz believes. Rather, it was Wexler’s
and Kahl’s bungled misunderstanding of what a platform is all about that led
to the primetime hiccup and “hurt the president.”
Many Jewish Democrats were still unhappy about the reinserted language on
Thursday.
“They still did not reinsert [language saying] Israel is our most reliable
ally in the Middle East. And they did not reinsert [language saying
Palestinian] refugees will return to a Palestinian state. Those are
fundamental parts of the special relationship” between the US and Israel,
said the leader.
Dershowitz, too, was “not satisfied…..and I communicated this to the White
House.”
Democrats are now looking to move past the incident, which is why it is
difficult to get any Democratic insider to speak on the matter on record.
But the public quiet hides behind-the-scenes agitation. Democrats have
witnessed, spectacularly, their clumsiness on Israel, even from such veteran
and intelligent operators as Wexler and Kahl, insiders acknowledge. They
will likely be much more careful on the issue in the 61 days that remain
till November 6.
--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website: www.imra.org.il
Democrats who followed or attended their national convention in Charlotte
this week generally insist it was energizing, interesting, and reaffirmed
for many the argument against Mitt Romney and for Barack Obama.
But the platform debacle – which saw the party dropping mentions of
Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, the only instance of the word “God” and
several pro-Israel provisions from its platform, only to have to hurriedly
reinstate God and Jerusalem – won’t disappear so quickly from memory if
Jewish Democratic leaders have their way. Some have started to call for
blood.
The platform was handled “by children,” one Jewish leader in Charlotte who
asked to remain anonymous told The Times of Israel.
In the kind of scathing critique that reporters heard from multiple sources
this week, the longtime Jewish activist said, “The people responsible for
the platform did such a terrible job working on the wording because they did
not conduct an inclusive process with members of the [pro-Israel] community.
That’s what led to this problem, and those people should be held
responsible.”
What’s more, some pro-Israel activists are far from satisfied even with the
corrected language in the platform.
Said longtime Democrat and prominent law professor Alan Dershowitz: “I would
like to see the president make statements over the course of the coming
weeks which re-affirm what was said in the 2008 platform, not only with
regards to Jerusalem, but in regard to the borders, the refugees and with
regard to Hamas,” he said. Off-the-record, other Jewish Democratic insiders
echo the objections.
The 2008 platform had demanded “the isolation of Hamas until that
organization renounces terrorism and accepts other requirements of the peace
process,” insisted that “any settlement of the so-called ‘refugees’ question
in a final settlement make a future Palestinian state, not Israel, the
destination for Palestinian ‘refugees,’” and noted “that it’s not realistic
to expect [the] outcome of negotiations to be a full and complete return to
the armistice lines of 1949.”
The platform produced ahead of the convention “wasn’t anti-Israel,” said the
Jewish leader who spoke to The Times of Israel anonymously. “It wasn’t bad.
It’s just that [the drafters] are children on this, and there was no adult
supervision. They don’t understand that there has to be continuity of
language. They threw out the previous platform and wrote a new one from
scratch.”
That inexperience led the Democrats to the embarrassing primetime television
spectacle of attempting to forcibly restore language about God and Jerusalem
to the platform on Wednesday through a voice vote on the convention floor –
a measure that was loudly booed by some delegates in the half-empty hall.
The Jewish activist’s description of the original platform rewrite process
was confirmed by a Democratic official, David Harris of the National Jewish
Democratic Council, who said Wednesday, “The party platform is not held up
from the previous election. A fresh document was created.”
Harris did not himself criticize party officials for the foul-up, instead
preferring to add to the praise other Jewish Democrats had for Obama’s
decision to reopen the platform, even at the cost of negative media
coverage.
“I’d say it’s a pretty significant moment for any political party to reopen
a political document like this at the request of the President of the United
States,” said Harris.
The Jewish leader agreed. The platform crafters erred by “trying to align
[the platform’s language] with the White House’s policy. The White House’s
policy is no different than it was under Bush. But policy is different from
a platform. They’re not the same thing.”
“The president’s decision to reinsert some of the language,” said the
leader, “was a rebuke to those who did this.”
The word “rebuke” figured heavily in Democrats’ version of events by
Thursday.
Dershowitz suggested to Algemeiner on Thursday that the boos in the
convention hall on Wednesday came from “rogue elements” of the far left. He
said the vote on the forced reinsertion of language on God and Jerusalem
made him “frankly very happy… because I think it alerted everybody to the
fact that this group within the Democratic Party poses a tremendous danger
to the bipartisan support for Israel that has characterized American
politics since 1948.”
“We caught them, and the president rebuked them basically,” he added.
The Jewish leader who spoke with the Times of Israel, a man intimately
familiar with Democratic Party institutions, dismissed the boos from the
convention floor, saying they were “mostly about God” rather than Jerusalem.
“The people in the room that early in the day were from the far left of the
party. Some of them didn’t understand the process, because it wasn’t
previewed for them. So they didn’t like the process, and they were reacting
to inserting God” into the platform, he said.
Pressed, however, as to whether C-SPAN’s footage of Arab American activists
booing indicated that some convention delegates may, in fact, have been
angered by wording over Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, the Democratic leader
conceded, “There were some anti-Israel activists in the crowd who made a lot
of noise.”
As they pick up the pieces of the PR debacle, Jewish Democrats are pointing
fingers at two names especially: former Florida Congressman Robert Wexler
and Georgetown University professor and defense analyst Colin Kahl.
Wexler could not be reached for comment. Kahl did not return emails
requesting comment.
The platform changes don’t reflect “the views of Democrats,” said the Jewish
leader, or even of a minority as Dershowitz believes. Rather, it was Wexler’s
and Kahl’s bungled misunderstanding of what a platform is all about that led
to the primetime hiccup and “hurt the president.”
Many Jewish Democrats were still unhappy about the reinserted language on
Thursday.
“They still did not reinsert [language saying] Israel is our most reliable
ally in the Middle East. And they did not reinsert [language saying
Palestinian] refugees will return to a Palestinian state. Those are
fundamental parts of the special relationship” between the US and Israel,
said the leader.
Dershowitz, too, was “not satisfied…..and I communicated this to the White
House.”
Democrats are now looking to move past the incident, which is why it is
difficult to get any Democratic insider to speak on the matter on record.
But the public quiet hides behind-the-scenes agitation. Democrats have
witnessed, spectacularly, their clumsiness on Israel, even from such veteran
and intelligent operators as Wexler and Kahl, insiders acknowledge. They
will likely be much more careful on the issue in the 61 days that remain
till November 6.
--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website: www.imra.org.il
Posts
