Tuesday, 2 December 2008

The nasty side of the Euro

Tuesday, 2 December, 2008 12:26 PM
From:
What we don’t often hear about is here!

In all the “spin” about the euro and the “people wsho matter” the 
voters are - as is usual in the EU - are being ignored.

Then secondly  there is the dire picture of Hungary.  This is largely 
caused by trying to join the Euro.  NOT a good idea for Hungary any 
more than it is for Britain or Scandinavia - or Ireland, or Spain, or 
Greece, or Italy.

Before one gets complacent, realise that an appeal to the IMF remains 
a possibility.  After all it was under a previous Labour government 
that we were forced into that very humiliating situation.

xxxxxxxxxx cs
========================
EUROPEAN FOUNDATION INTELLIGENCE DIGEST    2.12.08

1.Euro even more unpopular in Scandinavia
Leading politicians in Denmark and Sweden have used the financial 
crisis as an excuse for starting a new campaign in favour of the 
euro. Public opinion, however, is unimpressed and the single currency 
remains as unpopular as before.


More people remain opposed to abolishing the national currencies in 
both countries than those who support this. Both countries would need 
to have a referendum before adopting the euro; neither country now 
seems likely to hold one. In Denmark the polls show 42 per cent 
against the euro and 40 per cent in favour but that is not enough for 
the government to win a referendum, at least according to the current 
Prime Minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who is trying to hold out the 
prospect of a new euro referendum by 2011.

In Sweden the latest figures are 53 per cent against. (as opposed to 
56 per cent when the Swedes voted against the euro in 2003). The 
reason for the continuing opposition to the euro is not difficult to 
discern: it is that Sweden and Denmark have continued to fare better 
outside the euro zone than inside it. [Helmut Steuer, Handelsblatt, 
12 November 2008]


2. Hungary “like a third world country”

All of Europe has suffered in the financial crisis but no country 
more so than Hungary, which has been forced to the International 
Monetary Fund for a bailout. Normally this is something one 
associated with Third World states, not members of the European 
Union. The recourse to the IMF is very humiliating for the Hungarian 
government, not least because only two weeks beforehand the head of 
the Hungarian national bank was saying that the country did not need 
any special credit lines from anyone.

More importantly, in a recent advertising campaign, he government of 
Ferenc Gyurcsány boasted of the country’s strong economy. (Gyurcsány 
famously boasted in 2006, albeit in private, that he and his 
colleagues had lied brazenly about the state of the economy in order 
to get re-elected.) Now Hungary has taken 20 billion euros in credit 
from the European Central Bank, the World Bank and the IMF, and the 
country is facing a severe recession. Salaries will be frozen or even 
cut; pensions will be slashed. Thus will the conditions be fulfilled 
which the IMF has attached to its loan.
[Reinhard Olt, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 30 October 2008]