Frank correspondence with The Queen and the Head of Constitutional Policy
Under the British Constitution we are supposed to have a Sovereign who checks the power of an arrogantly misguided Parliament and defends our liberties and laws under the British Constitution.
Instead we are told that the Sovereign has no constitutional responsibility to prevent Parliament from signing up to an unconstitutional treaty that will place Britain under foreign domination.
Last year I wrote to The Queen, whose life-long covenant with the British people under the British Constitution is to defend the people's liberties, laws and customs. A series of letters resulted, with the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) contributing their misinformed views of the British Constitution and the role of The Queen.
In late January I received another letter, this time from the MOJ's Eirian Walsh Atkins, Head of Constitutional Policy, correcting the first MOJ letter and making one momentous constitutional admission - the Bill of Rights and Act of Settlement are written parts of the British Constitution.
What Ms Atkins failed to note was also significant. And, to my astonishment, Ms Atkins made completely erroneous statements about The Queen's constitutional role.
On the 16th of February I responded bluntly to The Queen, quoting Ms Atkins and laying out the implications for the Monarchy and Britain. I reiterated my original and still unanswered questions. The letter to Ms Atkins and my letter to The Queen appear here.
I hope they will interest you.
All the best,
David F. Abbott
Posts
