Sunday, March 08, 2009
Why Obama Wants America to Fail
by Kevin McCullough
http://suppressedne ws.com/cgi- bin/news/ viewnews. cgi?id=EkFyVFyFV AwwOihBMS& tmpl=offsitenews"Not letting a good crisis go to waste."
This idea popped up multiple times in the past seven days as multiple
members of Obama's administration seemed to be in total agreement. Their
conclusion: by not quickly solving the crisis of the American economy, we
can create drastic social and structural change. Not surprisingly, this is
the path even President Obama alluded to in his Saturday address to the
nation.
On Saturday the President challenged his country to see its hard times as a
chance to "discover great opportunity in the midst of great crisis."
"That is what we can do and must do today. And I am absolutely confident
that is what we will do," Obama said in his address.
But is that what "we the people" hired him to do? To use "great
opportunities" to change the face and fabric of the nation?
"We the People" were promised swift and effective action towards getting the
markets repaired by President Obama, but they have dropped about 1400 points
each week since he's taken power. "We the People" were promised greater
fiscal responsibility by candidate Obama, yet his own proposals throw us
down a black hole of debt, the likes of which we've never seen in a single
year of an administration, much less in the first sixty days of one. "We the
People" were promised the greatest commitment ever to oversight of the
federal use of the money we send the government. What we've been handed is a
series of embarrassing nominations of people who are willing to use the
force of a gun to make you pay your taxes, but did not think twice about not
paying theirs. "We the People" were told that his push for a stimulus would
get people working again, yet barely 3% of it goes to actual job creation
and projects that can even be initiated in the next 24 months. "We the
People" were promised greater employment fulfillment and more vibrant
business and economic outlooks when Obama's administration finally put
together their plan to save the lending institutions. What we are dealing
with is a greater spike in the unemployment numbers in Obama's first sixty
days than was experienced under President Bush in his first seven years. "We
the People" were promised an earmark free, pork free, bare bones budget, but
as of last count Obama's omnibus bill contained 9200 earmarks.
So I don't find it surprising that recently even Obama supporters are now
openly questioning his plan to revive the economy.
As of last month, we know that more than 55% of the American people wanted
help for the economy to come primarily through the reduction of taxes. The
same poll found that only a little over 20% think more government spending
was the answer.
Whoopi Goldberg surprised even herself on The View this week,
unintentionally criticizing President Obama's plan to tax the American
people into better economic conditions. She doesn't believe that she should
have to turn around and write a check to Washington DC for nearly 40% of
what she earns.
Who could blame her?
Yet it is important to point out that there are now far more economists on
record that have advised the President against larger government and pushed
him towards tax relief, than those who supported the increased centralized
control of a soft socialism that President Obama seems destined to aim for.
And "We the People" should be asking ourselves why?
If it makes no sense to the free market economists that populate the best
economics programs across the nation, if it weakens the ability for the
average family to make ends meet, and if it does not increase the number of
people actually working, why is President Obama so stubbornly continuing to
pursue his economically diabolical plan of destruction?
Because it's part of the master plan to "not let a good crisis go to waste."
President Obama knows the history of recessions and how Americans get out of
them. He knows, for example, that if he gave back to the American family in
just pure cash handouts what he is instead planning on taxing them (with
interest) in the days to come, that the number would loom between
$25,000-$65, 000 per family, for every family in America.
But pretending to be doing something about the problem is only half the
strategy for Obama. He truly intends to see socialized health care, and
European styled labor agreements become reality in America. He knows the
consequences of doing such things, he's seen all the projections and what
the outcomes would be, but he's doing it anyway.
But there is one tiny problem standing in his way to getting there--"We The
People!"
He knows that in order to be forced down paths that we don't wish to go, the
only way he gets us to change our mind is to create abject suffering and
misery.
Then in Venezuelan styled cries for help, he can promise to take America to
a better place economically, a place of greater care, a place of true
serenity. A place like Venezuela.
Rachel Maddow told Jay Leno this week that she found it "creepy" that
someone would want the President's policies to fail.
I find it creepy that Rachel Maddow is so ignorant that she refuses to think
analytically concerning her President's plans for this nation. After all she
is one of us--"We The People."
President Obama and his team do not intend to solve this crisis as quickly
as they possibly could--like he promised on the campaign trail. Instead, his
intention is to let us bleed until the whimper we are expressing now finally
builds into an all out, gut wrenching, cry of anguish. He does not care what
must be done to arrive at that reality, only that we arrive there.
Many think the Obama administration is incompetent, and surely they've
proved this, from the vetting of their appointments to handling the limited
foreign relationships they've entertained thus far.
But on the domestic agenda they are as sly as foxes, and our future is the
henhouse.
And in refusing to allow a "good crisis" to go to waste, the strategic move
to remake Amerika anew has begun.
Posts
