Thursday, 1 October 2009


No Means Yes
 
2009/09/30
DUBLIN/BERLIN
 
(Own report) - This coming Friday, the people of Ireland will repeat their referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, under strong pressure from Brussels and Berlin. Just a few days before the referendum, German President, Horst Koehler signed the Lisbon Treaty, concluding the ratification process for Germany. This is supposed to be a "signal" to the Irish to withdraw their "No" from the June 2008 referendum and vote "Yes," it is being said in the German capital, where prudent optimism reigns. Under pressure from the continent, Dublin launched an intensive PR campaign tailored to win over the opponents to this elite project, particularly among the urban lower strata and rural inhabitants. Therefore, this referendum can serve as a barometer for how well the elite of the EU, by means of simple PR, will be able to neutralize democratic resistance to their project of domination. In Berlin it is being pointed out that even if the Irish vote "Yes", there is still a danger coming from Great Britain, where, under certain circumstances, the population could also be called upon to express their opinion on the treaty. German political advisors are predicting a clear "No" if this happens.
World Power EU
This Friday, the people of Ireland will vote, for the second time, on the Lisbon Treaty. That document, which earlier, under the name of "EU Constitution," had been rejected in referendums in France and the Netherlands, was also rejected in June 2008 by the Irish population. If democratic standards would have been applied, the treaty would have already twice been discarded. The EU, which had abandoned democratic standards already for the ratification of the Treaty of Nice - when a negative Irish vote was simply repeated -, seeks to have this document imposed at any price. The Lisbon Treaty contains regulations that German government advisors consider an indispensible contribution to the EU and its hegemonic power, Germany, for reaching world power status: a tight organization of European foreign policy, including the establishment of an EU foreign minister and the obligation of all member nations to create a EU armed forces, as well as to participate in a permanent, synchronized arms buildup.[1]
A Strong Signal
Already before the first Irish referendum in June 2008, Berlin had put Dublin under enormous pressure, insisting on a "Yes" to the Lisbon Treaty from the Irish population. (german-foreign-policy.com reported.[2]) Foreign pressure could possibly have been counterproductive is the opinion heard in Berlin since the "No," which is why in the lead up to this year's Irish campaign, German politicians have been a bit more restrained. But a few days ago German President Horst Koehler quickly ratified the treaty - a step parliamentarians in Berlin believe will be taken as a "strong Signal" in Dublin.[3] In addition the EU Commission intervened and campaigned for the treaty, for example with costly newspaper inserts. The pressure on the Irish government has also been maintained from behind the scenes. Political advisors in Berlin are contemplating the "creation of a new supra-national union" - excluding Ireland - as well as hinting that Ireland should "voluntarily" leave the EU.[4] A third repetition of the referendum is also still being discussed, though not as a primary option - after all, this would completely destroy all democratic pretenses.
Air War, Ground War
The PR campaign that Dublin, launched under pressure from Berlin and Brussels, is comprehensive. The Irish government claims that the "No" of the June 2008 referendum, was due to the population's lack of knowledge and could be transformed into a "Yes" simply through enlightenment. Even German political advisors are admitting "that those in favor of the treaty are still having difficulties providing a positive reason for voting in favor of that complex accord."[5] The EU establishment in Dublin has founded several new PR organizations and further professionalized its campaign. Among the means used is an intensive presence in the media - known as the "air war" - and its canvassing on the streets and from door to door (the "ground war"). Therefore this referendum could serve as a barometer for whether the elite in the EU, by means of simple PR, will be able to neutralize democratic resistance to their project.
Show Business
The campaign has been organized along precise sociological criteria. Analyses of the June 2008 referendum showed that the "Yes" vote could actually be pinpointed: The majority of the affluent milieu living in the Irish capital's prosperous communities approved the Lisbon Treaty. They are the ones who politically and economically benefit from the EU's elite project, while the majority in the lower strata in Irish cities and rural catholic milieus voted "No", because they obviously cannot hope for any improvements through the hegemonic cravings of the EU's elite.[6] In its efforts to coerce a "Yes" outcome, Dublin is engaging key personalities in its campaign, such as famous athletes and prominent show business people, popular enough among the lower classes to possibly have an influence on certain milieus of the treaty's opponents. Rural catholic milieus are being urged to vote "Yes", by a bishop from Northern Ireland (!), who is a proponent of the treaty.
Last Resistance
Berlin and Brussels are expecting that only London could pose problems. According to the British press, David Cameron, the conservative opposition leader, has asked Czech president Václav Klaus for his support. Klaus has not yet ratified the treaty. But he is delaying his signing, because Czech parliamentarians are asking a court to examine certain aspects of the treaty for their conformity to the Czech Constitution. Whereas the Labor government had not found it necessary that the British people vote on the treaty, Cameron would like to hold a referendum. But this would mean that Cameron has to annul the Labor government's ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, which can only be done if his party wins a majority in parliament and he becomes the next prime minister. The chances of this taking place are very good, because of the Labor Party's dramatic loss of standing. But it is not yet certain, if the Czech president will delay his signature under the Lisbon Treaty until after the British elections in the spring 2010. It is this delay that Cameron is said to have asked Václav Klaus for.[7]
The Next Campaign
According to the British press, the EU establishment is already up in arms. If the Irish referendum provides a "Yes" this Friday, the next EU campaign already has its target - Czech President, Václav Klaus.
top print

Many Irish are citing the support Ireland has had from the eurozone in its difficvulties as a reason for voting “yes’.  Like so much of the ‘Yes” campaign’s propaganda this is not true to any meaningful extent.  The eurozone is being exposed to stresses and strains as the weaker bretheren have to cope with the rigidities of the European Bank.  

Iceland has suffered the pain and has its destiny now in its own hands - AS DO WE - financially!  

Christina
==================================
FINANCIAL TIMES 1.10.09
Ireland vs Iceland: Which will emerge from economic crisis first?

Ireland’s referendum on the Lisbon treaty on Friday should in principle be about the treaty’s contents, not the state of the Irish economy.  But the economy’s collapse over the past 12 months compels both pro-Lisbon and anti-Lisbon forces to confront the question of whether membership of the European Union - and, specifically, of the eurozone - has helped (even saved) Ireland, made things worse, or not made much difference one way or the other.

An interesting angle from which to approach this question is to ask whether Ireland has fared better than another island off the north-west coast of Europe that was thrown into turmoil at almost exactly the same moment last year - namely, Iceland.  Iceland isn’t a EU member and doesn’t use the euro.  Has this accelerated Iceland’s recovery or held it back?

In terms of headline gross domestic product figures, Iceland comes out narrowly ahead.  Over the last four quarters, its economy has contracted by a cumulative 3.8 per cent, almost half Ireland’s 7.4 per cent, according to a Deutsche Bank study.  But the inflation numbers paint a different picture: Iceland’s consumer price index is up 10.9 per cent since August, Ireland’s is down 2.4 per cent.  Both countries, of course, have horrendously high budget deficits - 13.5 per cent of GDP predicted this year for Iceland, 12 per cent for Ireland.

Unquestionably, the main difference relates to each nation’s external exchange rate and, by extension, its international business competitiveness.  The Icelandic krona all but collapsed after the crisis broke out, whereas Ireland, using the euro, could not devalue.  The result is that Iceland’s unit labour costs have fallen by 29 per cent over the past 12 months and by an astonishing 45. 6 per cent from their peak in the fourth quarter of 2005.   

By contrast, Irish unit labour costs have dropped by only 4.3 per cent over the past year - and this has occurred more because of painful adjustments in the real economy (unemployment, reduced working time, reduced bonuses and wage cuts) than because of exchange rate factors (a falling euro [Eh?  What against? -cs] ).  Irish exports to the UK have been affected by the steep fall in the pound against the euro.

Of course, the geyser that is the Icelandic economy is still throwing up columns of noxious steam.  Iceland remains vulnerable because of the unparalleled damage inflicted on its financial sector and sovereign debt position.

But the hard truth is that Ireland - like fellow eurozone members Italy, Greece and Spain - has a long and hard road ahead to claw back its competitiveness.  And this is a lesson with even broader implications for Europe.  For when the dust settles, it may well emerge that the financial crisis has served to accentuate the differences in competitive advantage in the eurozone between, on the one hand, Germany and other star performers such as Finland and the Netherlands and, on the other, Ireland and the Mediterranean countries.

Iran, America, Israel: the nuclear gamble, Paul Rogers

The revelation late on 24 September 2009 that Iran is in the process of building a second uranium-enrichment plant inside a mountain near the holy city of Qom introduces a fresh source of dispute to a longstanding contest of wills between the...

Read more »

Barack Obama’s great test , Godfrey Hodgson

A whirlwind week of international diplomacy in the United States, in which Barack Obama was at the very centre, provides as true a measure as any of the emerging character of his political leadership.  The news is not good. For this intense series...

Read more »

Balancing on Wheels of Hope, Alice Welbourn

Balancing on Wheels of Hope

Alice Welbourn is an
international activist and campaigner on women's rights and HIV/Aids, and former 
chair of the International Community of Women Living with HIV/Aids.
Previous articles 
...

Read more »



Schoolhouse Shariah

Dear Harold,

As we reported to you recently, a new Pew Research poll shows American attitudes about Islam trending toward accepting the narrative that organizations like CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) are peddling.

This narrative includes the propositions that Islam is and historically has been a religion of peace and that Muslims are the victims of a great deal of discrimination in this country.

Not coincidentally, this faulty narrative is being peddled in many of our public schools. Small wonder more and more Americans are falling for it.

Several months ago the ACT! for America Mission Viejo (CA) chapter completed an
eye-opening report about the disinformation and outright propaganda showing up in public school curricula and textbooks that deal with Islam.

But some of that pales in comparison to the Orwellian “newspeak” that has recently been handed down by California’s education establishment with respect to teaching Islamic studies.

For instance, as reported in the Investors Business Daily editorial below:

  …the suggested framework glorifies Shariah as a liberal reform movement that "rejected" the mistreatment of women that existed in Arabia before Muhammad and his successors conquered the region, according to Accuracy in Academia. The guidelines claim that Islamic law established for the first time that men and women were entitled to equal "respect."

This astonishing example of historical revisionism is just one more reason why we communicate such a sense of urgency to you about the rapid advance of radical Islam and creeping shariah here in the United States. Our window to build the organized resistance to defeat this is not twenty or thirty years long – it is more like five to ten at best.

Over the past two decades college campuses have become hotbeds for pro-Islamist, anti-Israel, anti-Semitic, and anti-American indoctrination. This has now made its way into our public high schools and middle schools.

If an entire generation of American students are successfully indoctrinated with lies, such as that shariah Islamic law established that men and women were entitled to equal respect, the chances that we can successfully roll back the rising tide of radical Islam dim immensely.

As Hitler is reported to have said to the adults in Germany, “I care not what you think…I have the children.”


Investors Business Daily Editorials

Schoolhouse Shariah

Posted 09/24/2009 06:53 PM ET



Multiculturalism: California's educrats have put out new rules for teaching Islamic studies to seventh-graders in public schools, and they are as biased as ever. They'll also likely spread eastward.

The lesson guidelines adopted by the bellwether state whitewash the violence and oppression of women codified in Islamic law, or Shariah. And they're loaded with revisionist history about the faith.

For example, the suggested framework glorifies Shariah as a liberal reform movement that "rejected" the mistreatment of women that existed in Arabia before Muhammad and his successors conquered the region, according to Accuracy in Academia. The guidelines claim that Islamic law established for the first time that men and women were entitled to equal "respect."

Not so, says Islamic scholar and author Nonie Darwish, who grew up Muslim in Egypt.

"I am shocked that that is what they teach," she said. "Women had more rights in Arabia before Shariah."

In fact, "wife beating is allowed under Shariah" today, she added. "It allows a woman seen without a headdress to be flogged, punishes rape victims, and calls for beheading for adultery."

California's course on world religions also omits Islam's long history of jihadist violence, while portraying Christianity as an intolerant and bloodthirsty faith.

Christianity isn't given equal time, either. It's covered in just two days — as opposed to up to two weeks for Islam — and doesn't involve kids in any role-playing activities like the Islam unit.


Students do get a healthy dose of skepticism about the Christian faith, including a biting history of its persecution of other people.

Islam, in contrast, gets a pass from critical review. Even jihad is presented as an "internal personal struggle to do one's best to resist temptation," not waging holy war.

"California schools are pushing an unbalanced religious agenda that favors Islam and minimizes Christianity and Judaism," Accuracy in Academia warns in its latest Campus Report.

Who helped build the California Education Department's framework for Islamic studies? Islamist "scholars" with the Council on Islamic Education, or CIE, a Saudi-tied activist group.

The consultancy changed its name after former IBD Washington bureau chief Paul Sperry, author of "Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington," exposed that its chief researcher and textbook consultant for years taught social studies at a Saudi madrassa just outside Washington.

The Islamic Saudi Academy is a breeding ground for terrorists, including the valedictorian-turned-al-Qaida agent recently sentenced to life for plotting to assassinate President Bush.

Recently, Fox News reported that the head of CIE — now known as the Institute on Religion and Civic Values — misled California education authorities about his academic credentials. For one, Shabbir Mansuri never received a USC degree in chemical engineering as he has claimed, Fox says.

The group's Web site no longer includes the claim. These are the folks who are teaching your children about Islam in public schools. Parents have protested, even sued, but to no avail.

For example, parents of seventh-graders in the San Francisco area, who after 9/11 were taught pro-Islamic lessons as part of California's world history curriculum, sued under the First Amendment ban on religious establishment.

They argued, reasonably, that the government was promoting Islam by mandating that their kids participate in Muslim role-playing exercises such as designing prayer rugs, taking an Arabic name and essentially "becoming a Muslim" for two full weeks.

Children also were told to recite aloud Muslim prayers that begin with "In the name of Allah, most gracious, most merciful," and memorize the Muslim profession of faith: "Allah is the only true God, and Muhammad is his messenger."

But a federal judge appointed by President Clinton told parents in so many words to get over it, that the state was merely teaching kids about another "culture."

California's 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the decision, ruling that it was OK to put public-school kids through Muslim role-playing exercises.

The decision was a major victory for the multiculturalists and Islamic apologists in California and across the country who've never met a culture or religion they didn't like — with the exception of Western civilization and Christianity.

You can't teach the Ten Commandments in public schools. But teaching the five pillars of Islam is A-OK.



© 2009 Investor's Business Daily, Inc. All rights reserved.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Make sure you receive all of your messages from ACT for America. Add
actforamerica@donationnet.net to your address book as an approved email sender. If you found this message in your "Bulk" or "Spam" folder, please click the "Not Spam" button to notify your provider that these are emails you want to receive.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org

Prophetic Trends & Headline News


Where is the U.S. in Bible Prophecy?
Israel - God's Timepiece
A Revived Roman Empire?
The Gog/Magog War
Apostate Christianity
The Rise of Islam
Increase in Knowledge & New Technologies
Christian Worldview & Issues
Other Events To Watch

September 30, 2009   

 

Al-Qaeda Killers Now Packing Bombs Up Their B*ttholes

Al Qaeda has developed a new trick.
Booty Bombs

They are now packing explosives up their rectums so that they can breach security.
Al-Qaeda recently
used this method to attack Saudi Prince Mohammed Bin Nayef, head of the kingdom's counter terrorism operations.

CBS has the video  http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5347857n&tag=related;photovideo

Sheila MacVicar reports suicide bombers are now
storing explosives inside their bodies in order to avoid detection.
 
 
-------
(these bombs are very difficult for security to detect)
 



The Last Great Offshore Tax Shelter

By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud

"I can't believe Porsche allows people to do this," I said out loud as I came out of the hairpin turn and sped back up to 100 miles an hour.
On Tuesday, I drove brand new Porsche cars on Porsche's private race track in Leipzig, Germany. Porsche let me (and my colleagues from The Atlas 400 Club) push their new, $100,000+ cars as hard as we wanted.
I was flying around the track in a new 911 Carrera. My wheels were squealing at the brink of spinout about a third of the time. And yet I could hardly keep up with my
DailyWealth colleagues Ned and Brian in the new Panamera Turbo in front of me.
That day was unquestionably one of the most exciting things I've ever experienced. It was arranged for The Atlas 400 Club by my old friend Joel Nagel. A while back, he happened to meet the CEO of Porsche Germany at an international Rotary conference, and they hit it off. Joel speaks fluent German. And over dinner at the CEO's house, Joel put this day together for us.
While we were flying back to Munich that night, I sat next to Joel. He's an American attorney based in the States. And for most of his legal career, he's done tax planning. He told me he recommends his clients keep a portion of their assets offshore if possible.
I asked him about what's going on in Switzerland... With banks like UBS turning over records to U.S. tax authorities, it seems like its famous bank privacy laws are disappearing.
Joel said, "Oh, Switzerland is definitely still open for business." And he told me about a completely legal offshore option...
With what he called "the last, best tax shelter," you can...
· Grow your wealth without paying income tax on the gains.
· Choose how your money is invested.
· Access your funds without triggering taxable capital gains.
· Pass your money on to your heirs, without being subject to estate tax.
· Legally avoid reporting this offshore program to the IRS.
The idea at its core is simple and crafty: It's life insurance... But the important part is, the insurance is from an offshore life insurance company that issues U.S.-compliant policies.
The "trick" is, the money is officially the life insurance company's. But you can have it invested on your behalf by Swiss advisors. The Swiss are happy to do it... They're investing money from an offshore insurance company, not from
you, the American.
Since it's legally life insurance, the money you've built up in that policy can be passed on to your heirs outside of estate tax. And you can access it by borrowing against it.
 
Related Articles
The Best Way to Beat Higher Taxes
How to Use Your Retirement Savings, Penalty-Free... at Any Age
 
Now, I assume the fees are high. You're paying the cost of life insurance and then you're paying for an investment manager to invest your premiums. So it probably doesn't make sense to consider this unless you're able to put six figures into the premiums for a few years.
I don't have all the details... It was just a casual conversation with Joel. I'm not a tax advisor or a lawyer. And I'm not sure I got everything exactly right.
But my friend Joel Nagel is an attorney specializing in tax planning. We've been friends for a long time. And he's an interesting guy, definitely worth getting to know.
If something like this sounds interesting to you, don't take my word for it... To get in touch with Joel for more information (and for corrections on whatever I got wrong) about "the last, best tax shelter," e-mail him at
nagellaw@aol.com.
Good investing,
Steve



Warning! The Liberal Left is trying to ensnare you!!!!
By David Barton
As some of you may have recently seen, employees of ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) have been captured on tape showing others how to break the law. Congress has initiated action to shut off millions of public dollars currently given to the organization, and many other government agencies have severed ties with them. The Liberal Left, instead of condemning these illegal and immoral actions, wants to retaliate by showing that it's no big deal because "everybody does it." We have received very credible intelligence that they are now planning their own undercover "sting" operations targeted against conservative political and religious groups and leaders. 

How Pathetic Preaching Damages National Security
By Dave Welch
One of the country's most articulate and credible voices on the threat of radical Islam within our borders stated last week that it is the greatest threat to our nation today beyond any other domestic issues we are addressing. In the strictly national security and geopolitical contexts, this person was right. As she stated, government takeover of health care and other industries are not a concern to those who are dead.

Brannon Howse's New Book
The People & Worldviews Destroying America From The Grave

Brannon Howse reveals how the worldviews of 21 dead people are still influencing every aspect of American life and vying for the hearts and minds of adults and students. Whether we are discussing, law, science, economics, history, family, social issues, education or religion, the people and worldviews seeking to further their agenda in these disciplines are almost always connected back to four major forces. Brannon reveals the connection between occultism/pagan spirituality, the apostate church, the educational establishment and government/corporations.

Through this book you will come to understand the oppositions worldview, heroes, goals, strategies, masking terms, networks and targets. Those who share the worldviews of these 21 enemies of our constitutional republic and Biblical worldview do not want their agenda and its consequences to be revealed to the American people. Above all, they do not want us to equip and train our children and grandchildren with a Biblical worldview by which to recognize, reject, and fight against their seductive and destructive lies. This book will equip you to do just that as Brannon gives specific and pro-active responses you can take to make this the finest hour for the American church.

Here is the list of twenty-one for which Brannon has dug up worldview facts you must know and prepare to oppose:

Saul Alinsky, Karl Marx, John Dewey, John Maynard Keynes, Aldous Huxley, Charles Darwin, Friedrich Nietzsche, Margaret Sanger, William James, Alice Bailey, Helen Schucman, Sigmund Freud, Alfred Kinsey, Benjamin Bloom, B.F. Skinner, The Frankfurt School, Soren Kierkegaard, Julius Wellhausen, Christopher Columbus Langdell, Betty Friedan and Roger Baldwin

Worldview Matters with Brannon Howse
America's Enemies from Within: Topic One: How Pathetic Preaching Damages National Security, Topic Two: Gore Vidal says he is sorry he backed Obama and that "we'll have a military dictatorship soon, on the basis nobody else can hold everything together." Topic Three: Obama includes homosexual couples in "National Family Day". Topic Four: Empire State building to glow communist red, yellow. Topic Four: Hear the full audio of the students in NC rapping about Obama. Topic Five: We take your calls on whether you think governments should contract with private companies to serve as police officers.

Ahmadinejad and the 12th Imam
By Joel Rosenberg
Since September 2006, I have been urging Western journalists to ask Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the record about his beliefs in the "Twelfth Imam" and about the implications of his annual prayer at the U.N. asking for Allah to "hasten" the arrival of the Islamic messiah, also known as the "Mahdi."

Ten Questions to Ask Your Biology Teacher About Intelligent Design
By Sean McDowell
If nature, or some aspect of it, is intelligently designed, how could we tell? Design inferences in the past were largely informal and intuitive. Usually people knew it when they saw it. Intelligent design, by introducing specified complexity, makes the detection of design rigorous. Something is complex if it is hard to reproduce by chance and specified if it matches an independently given pattern (an example is the faces on Mt. Rushmore). Specified complexity gives a precise criterion for reliably inferring intelligence. 


Dear Subscribers and Friends of The Objective Standard,

 The contents of the Fall issue are:

From the Editor

Letters and Replies

ARTICLES

Obama’s Atomic Bomb: The Ideological Clarity of the Democratic Agenda

by John David Lewis

 America’s Self-Crippled Foreign Policy: An Interview with Yaron Brook, Elan Journo, and Alex Epstein

 An Unwinnable War?

by Elan Journo

 The Creed of Sacrifice vs. The Land of Liberty

by Craig Biddle

 The Rise of American Big Government: A Brief History of How We Got Here

by Michael Dahlen

 How the Freedom to Contract Protects Insurability

by Paul Hsieh

 How Morality is Grounded in Reality

by Craig Biddle