7:51PM BST 16 Jul 2011 Sir John Beddington may have thought he was earning his £165,000 a year as the Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser when he was last week reported as proposing that it should “use climate-related disasters overseas to persuade British voters to accept unpopular policies for curbing carbon emissions”. The sort of disasters Sir John had in mind included last year’s Russian heatwave, the floods in Pakistan and Queensland and the current drought in East Africa, all of which climate zealots have rushed to blame on global warming. But Sir John, who is a professor in “applied population biology”, may not be aware that each of these examples has been shown by scientific studies not to be evidence of “climate change”. A new paper in Geophysical Research Letters confirms that the parts of Russia affected by last year’s heatwave “show no significant warming trend” over the past 130 years. Similar studies have shown that the 2010 Paikstan floods were no worse than those in 1929. The flooding in Queensland was lower than that in 1974. It was only turned into a disaster by the sudden release of water from a dam, which had been held back on the orders of state politicians who were obsessed with the need to store water because of their fear that global warming would cause droughts. Even the UN now says that the Horn of Africa’s worst drought for 60 years cannot be ascribed to climate change. In a week when Chris Huhne, Energy and Climate Change Secretary, announced “carbon saving” measures which are predicted to double energy bills within nine years and drive more than half the population into fuel poverty, one can see that he might be desperate to “persuade British voters” that his absurdly costly gimmicks are justified. But if he wants advice on climate change more plausible than just scare stories that echo his own prejudices, he could do with someone better qualified in that field than a specialist in applied population biology – whatever that may be. MP votes both for and against giving away your £9 billion Henry Smith, MP for Crawley, was proud to be among the 31 Tory backbenchers who last Monday rebelled against the Government by voting against its wish to provide the IMF with a further £9.8 billion to assist in bailing out various failing EU economies such as Greece. This earned him brownie points with Euro-sceptics who cannot understand why UK taxpayers should be prepared to lend nearly £400 for every household in the land to countries which may never be able to pay it back. It might seem particularly odd that we should want to do this when we ourselves are already having to borrow nearly £3 billion every week to pay for our own Government’s reckless overspending, But before the whips come down too hard on Mr Smith for voting against the Government, they should note that, as a loyal Tory with expectations of preferment, he also voted at the same time in support of the Government. As Hansard shows, Mr Smith went into the lobbies twice over, once against the motion and once in favour. According to Erskine May, MPs may vote in opposite directions only when they have made a mistake. But they must then explain to the House which side they had intended to support. Otherwise, the gambit practised by the member for Crawley, Mr “Facing Both Ways” Smith, is officially “deprecated as unparliamentary”. No doubt this man will go far.Queensland floods and Russian heatwave
will be used to justify 'climate change' policies
Chris Huhne's 'carbon saving' measures could double energy bills within nine
years - so Australian floods might help to wash down the British voter's bitter pills.
Sunday, 17 July 2011
Posts
