No wonder there's "climate changes"
It's time nutty professors & the like looked to the real reason there's so much climate changes ongoing.
Far from every innocent human beings being responsible for their "carbon footprints" ( as if carbon was any threat at all, on the contrary i'd imagine: more carbon =more plant life=more food) and suffering thievery of their money by way of "carbon taxation."(at least Dick Turpin wore a mask)
Isn't it time the Climate Terrorists were stopped in their tracks and the scroundrels brought to justice?
A sad day indeed ( as we all knew it would be) when humans could control the weather!!
pennine
*http://real-agenda.com/2012/08/26/weaponized-weather-exposed/?blogsub=confirming#blog_subscription-2
*http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
Is this Professor nutty or what?
***
Professor Calls for Death Penalty for Climate Change 'Deniers'
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/professor_calls_for_death_penalty_for_climate_change_deniers.html
December 31, 2012
Professor Calls for Death Penalty for Climate Change 'Deniers'
By Timothy Birdnow
It
is as inevitable as the rising of the sun; the Left, when thwarted in
their quest for power, suggests the use of lethal force to compel those
who disagree.
There
is a nauseating litany of murders done by our betters in their pursuit
of the Benthamite vision of "the greatest good for the most people" --
which in their minds equates to collectivization and socialism. You have
Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Margaret Sanger, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot. Now we
can add one more name to the list: Professor Richard Parncutt, Musicologist
at Graz University in Austria.
Parncutt
has issued -- and later retracted after it the public outcry -- a
manifesto calling for the execution of prominent "Climate Change
Deniers". What is interesting is that Parncutt hates the death penalty
and supports Amnesty International's efforts to end it.
This
would be a shocking thing for a college professor to do were it an
isolated incident, but this call has been made a number of times in the
past. For instance, an anonymous poster at the liberal website Talking
Points Memo called for similar action, as did Climate Progress editor Joe
Romm, who called for "deniers" to be strangled in their beds. Grist magazine
writer David Roberts called for Nuremberg trials for "deniers" and NASA's
James Hansen has likewise called for similar trials.
The violent rhetoric
has been ongoing -- and disturbing. Liberals in the United States have
repeatedly tried to blame mass shootings on talk radio for inflaming the
public, yet they are strangely silent about actual calls to violence on
the part of environmentalists.
Parncutt's
argument is predicated on the notion that we know for a fact that human
industrial emissions are causing Global Warming, err, Climate Change,
err, Climate Disruption, err, whatever they are calling it today, and
that this will lead to millions of deaths, so the public good would be
served by murdering those who exercise
their free speech and oppose the fundamental reorganization of the
international order. (He also calls for the murder of the Pope for the
Catholic Church's stand on contraception.) He claims that scientists
have no interest in promoting AGW (ignoring the Climategate e-mails and
the fact that money flows from
governments into research in direct proportion to the apocalyptic nature
of said research) and that they would get caught if they fudged data
(ignoring Michael Mann who was caught on a number of occasions and still
indulges in government funded scientific malpractice). He claims that
millions will die from climate change, ignoring the possibility that a
warmer, wetter world may actually increase agricultural output and make a
better world. He ignores the fact that draconian "sustainable"
environmental laws will drastically increase the price of everything,
which will guarantee the deaths of millions of people in Third World
countries.
Perhaps Dr. Parncutt should volunteer for the first of these executions.
What
is ignored here is that it is the radical environmentalists who engage
in murder and mayhem. It was Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber, who killed
innocent people in his war against industrial civilization. We've had Daniel
Andreas San Diego. We've had Chaim Nissim, Tre Arrow, Daniel McGowan, James
Lee, Jeff Luers, Eric McDavid, Marie Mason and John Wade We've had
organizations like the Earth Liberation Front. We have the proponents of
Deep Ecology.
In the past we had the Nazis, as Mark Musser has so eloquently illustrated
here at American Thinker. Today we have the return of Nazi thinking through
Climate Reductionism.
And
the first instinct of those on the Progressive Left is to murder their
enemies. Parncutt is showing what is in his heart. Granted, he did
apologize (no doubt to keep his position) but do we have any reason to
fear him or his compatriots less? Especially now; they are in great
anger because they know their time is short; Global Warming theory just
didn't pan out the way they planned.
Progressives have absolute faith in their intellectual powers, and will not
allow facts to stand in their way. Scientism
is the modern secular religion, and as Trevor Thomas points out in his
article, scientism is not science, but rather a belief system bejeweled
with scientific adornments. That there has been no global warming for
over fifteen years (contrary to theory) is immaterial. That we see no
acceleration of sea level rise, that Antarctica is not melting (see here and
here
), that there is no tropical troposphere hot spot, and no major warming
in the oceans, the theory is largely falsified. But there is far too
much money in it, and too much power and prestige to let it go, so
scientists continue to ignore the facts, as do the entire Progressive
Left. It has become an article of faith, not a matter for reason. And it
is a most useful article of faith, as it justifies world government and
Progressive intervention in every aspect of life.
So
now the call for executions of "deniers" is becoming more public, and
this will only metastasize as the situation grows more desperate for the
Gang Green. They are reverting to type.
***
Professor Calls for Death Penalty for Climate Change 'Deniers'
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/professor_calls_for_death_penalty_for_climate_change_deniers.html
December 31, 2012
Professor Calls for Death Penalty for Climate Change 'Deniers'
By Timothy Birdnow
It
is as inevitable as the rising of the sun; the Left, when thwarted in
their quest for power, suggests the use of lethal force to compel those
who disagree.
There
is a nauseating litany of murders done by our betters in their pursuit
of the Benthamite vision of "the greatest good for the most people" --
which in their minds equates to collectivization and socialism. You have
Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Margaret Sanger, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot. Now we
can add one more name to the list: Professor Richard Parncutt, Musicologist
at Graz University in Austria.
Parncutt
has issued -- and later retracted after it the public outcry -- a
manifesto calling for the execution of prominent "Climate Change
Deniers". What is interesting is that Parncutt hates the death penalty
and supports Amnesty International's efforts to end it.
This
would be a shocking thing for a college professor to do were it an
isolated incident, but this call has been made a number of times in the
past. For instance, an anonymous poster at the liberal website Talking
Points Memo called for similar action, as did Climate Progress editor Joe
Romm, who called for "deniers" to be strangled in their beds. Grist magazine
writer David Roberts called for Nuremberg trials for "deniers" and NASA's
James Hansen has likewise called for similar trials.
The violent rhetoric
has been ongoing -- and disturbing. Liberals in the United States have
repeatedly tried to blame mass shootings on talk radio for inflaming the
public, yet they are strangely silent about actual calls to violence on
the part of environmentalists.
Parncutt's
argument is predicated on the notion that we know for a fact that human
industrial emissions are causing Global Warming, err, Climate Change,
err, Climate Disruption, err, whatever they are calling it today, and
that this will lead to millions of deaths, so the public good would be
served by murdering those who exercise
their free speech and oppose the fundamental reorganization of the
international order. (He also calls for the murder of the Pope for the
Catholic Church's stand on contraception.) He claims that scientists
have no interest in promoting AGW (ignoring the Climategate e-mails and
the fact that money flows from
governments into research in direct proportion to the apocalyptic nature
of said research) and that they would get caught if they fudged data
(ignoring Michael Mann who was caught on a number of occasions and still
indulges in government funded scientific malpractice). He claims that
millions will die from climate change, ignoring the possibility that a
warmer, wetter world may actually increase agricultural output and make a
better world. He ignores the fact that draconian "sustainable"
environmental laws will drastically increase the price of everything,
which will guarantee the deaths of millions of people in Third World
countries.
Perhaps Dr. Parncutt should volunteer for the first of these executions.
What
is ignored here is that it is the radical environmentalists who engage
in murder and mayhem. It was Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber, who killed
innocent people in his war against industrial civilization. We've had Daniel
Andreas San Diego. We've had Chaim Nissim, Tre Arrow, Daniel McGowan, James
Lee, Jeff Luers, Eric McDavid, Marie Mason and John Wade We've had
organizations like the Earth Liberation Front. We have the proponents of
Deep Ecology.
In the past we had the Nazis, as Mark Musser has so eloquently illustrated
here at American Thinker. Today we have the return of Nazi thinking through
Climate Reductionism.
And
the first instinct of those on the Progressive Left is to murder their
enemies. Parncutt is showing what is in his heart. Granted, he did
apologize (no doubt to keep his position) but do we have any reason to
fear him or his compatriots less? Especially now; they are in great
anger because they know their time is short; Global Warming theory just
didn't pan out the way they planned.
Progressives have absolute faith in their intellectual powers, and will not
allow facts to stand in their way. Scientism
is the modern secular religion, and as Trevor Thomas points out in his
article, scientism is not science, but rather a belief system bejeweled
with scientific adornments. That there has been no global warming for
over fifteen years (contrary to theory) is immaterial. That we see no
acceleration of sea level rise, that Antarctica is not melting (see here and
here
), that there is no tropical troposphere hot spot, and no major warming
in the oceans, the theory is largely falsified. But there is far too
much money in it, and too much power and prestige to let it go, so
scientists continue to ignore the facts, as do the entire Progressive
Left. It has become an article of faith, not a matter for reason. And it
is a most useful article of faith, as it justifies world government and
Progressive intervention in every aspect of life.
So
now the call for executions of "deniers" is becoming more public, and
this will only metastasize as the situation grows more desperate for the
Gang Green. They are reverting to type.
Posts
